^ For Shambhu
(1) Evidence collected by the lovely Dr Kalyanaraman on the very ChristoTerrorist murder of Swami Lakshmanananda. Over two posts at
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/search/lab...mananda%20Swami
- <b>Christist conspiracy in assassination of Swami Lakshamananda: evidence.</b>
- <b>Evidence re: assassination of Swami Lakshamananda. Christian conspiracy unravels</b>
Includes text of the cretins/christians' resolution to murder the heroic Swami
and which Ashok Sahu, IPS (Retd.), Former Addl. Director General of Police, referred to, see here and here.
(2) <b>Kerala Christian appointed Chief Justice (CJ) to the Patna (Bihar High Court).</b>
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2008/11/im...ef-justice.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->from: Radha Rajan
date: Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:20 AM
subject: Re: Important - Orissa Chief Justice
A correction, he is appointed CJ to the Patna (Bihar High Court).
CJ Supreme Court KG Balakrishnan suffers from the worst reputation. In Kerala his brother KG Bhaskaran is disparagingly referred to as "collection agent". KG Balakrishnan's son-in-law is supposed to be close friends with Rahul Gandhi.
Read together with what is happening in law colleges across Tamil Nadu and the future doesn't look good for the quality of judges.
-- RR
* * *
(The following were all links off the above
"This is violence in Chennai trigerred by dalit christians I will wager everything I have".
Law college violence: Politics, casteism to blame
* * *
Missionaries are engaged in aggressive proselytizing and blasphemous propaganda against Hindu deities
Christian organizations justify conversions by saying that tribals are not Hindus.
Clinching evidences of Christian involvement in the assassination of Swami Lakshmanandaji: Ashok Singhal
In Orissa, the fundamentalist Christian missionaries have detected a fertile ground for spreading their poisonous culture.
Mao & Christ Come Together in Orissa
http://journalchretien.net/breve14777.html
Labels: Orissa Chief Justice<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(3) http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/search/lab...mananda%20Swami
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->ORISSA GOVERNMENT MUST APPREHEND FORTHWITH
KILLERS OF VEN. SWAMI LAKSHMANANANDAJI
-- Ashok Singhal
New Delhi, October 02, 2008 - Furious over the failure of the Orissa Government in apprehending any assassin of Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji Saraswati, Shri Ashok Singhal, International President of VHP said, âIt is a matter of grave concern of all Hindus in India & abroad that Christians dared to assassinate Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji - a Hindu icon of Orissa and revered Dharmacharya of India - on August 23, 2008. I met the Chief Minister of Orissa Shri Navin Patnaik a month ago with clinching evidences of Christian involvement in the assassination and urged him to apprehend the culprits. The date the X'ians chose for the heinous act had a loud statement - that is, it was Sri Krishna Janmashtami - one of the most auspicious days of Hindu calendar - and it was also the foundation day of Vishva Hindu Parishad, and, the Christians wanted to dare the Hindu society on that day by offering to Jesus for his pleasure the assassinated bodies of Hindu monks. But the State Government has not yet apprehended any X'ian mercenary and/or accomplice. It is because of the influence of the Church and their NGOs. The government has arrested hundreds of Hindus, but practically no Christian. I requested the Chief Minister to take under his command directly the entire enquiry module regarding the case that has wide implications and apprehend the culprits at the earliest. But, the new Director General of Police - Orissa is indiscriminately arresting leaders of Hindu organizations that are not related to any case. Those must be released forthwith whom the government has arrested with political motivation. We wish that normalcy returns to Orissa as soon as possible. But, it appears that the government itself is not interested in the return of normalcy, as it is interested in giving the culprits a free run. As long as the over-ground kingpin of the assassination conspiracy - Mr. Radhakant Nayak is not apprehended, the deep roots of the conspiracy and the faces of the remote kingpins that outsourced the assassination module cannot be unearthed, and, consequently, the situation won't become normal. The government must remember that Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji - a high-stature Dharmacharya of the country coming from a Tribal region of Orissa, a socio-cultural worker par excellence whose activities always remained aligned with the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A of the Constitution of India, who rightly opposed aggressive religious conversions through force, fraud and inducement, who was particularly against the entry of foreign-funded Missionaries in the "scheduled areas" of the country as that violated the indigenous culture, traditions and moorings of the Tribal people, who was for 'propagation' of religion under Art. 25(1) of Constitution (this right is for Indian citizens only), but rightly quoted the Supreme Court ruling that 'propagation' does not mean 'right to convert', who quoted the Niyogi Commission Report and the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act & Rules, 1987 & 1989 against conversions, and who was an uncompromising protagonist of robust nationalism, has been assassinated by the Christians."
Shri Singhal asked the Government of Orissa that "for the cause of peace, it must be up & doing in apprehending the assassins and their accomplices at the earliest."
- Released by Vishwa Samvad Kendra, New Delhi<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(4) The biggest problem is that Hindus are unable to identify christoterrorism, christianism's hand behind many events. In fact, Swami Lakshmanananda's murder is one of the more blatant instances and even there Hindus get confused about 'maoists' as if these are separate from cretins/christians.
Unlike islamism, christianism is no longer advertising in loudspeakers what it is doing. Most things are done very covertly. Some of the simpler signs to tell what is caused by christianism, but many Hindus are confused or not aware of even these.
1. Christianism always uses the psecular arm=a christocontrolled (or otherwise a christofavourable) govt to accomplish what it cannot do directly. E.g. programmatic destruction of temples by stealing their money to let them disintegrate out of lack of maintenance and funds, and <i>in the same stroke</i> promoting the forces inimical to Hindu Dharma (christoislamism) with the same money.
Psecular arm today also includes dawaganda=media.
2. The Joshua Project's subproject Project Thessalonica outlines its intentions and how it wants to achieve them. It's intentions are another way to gauge what anti-Hindu events are due to christoterrorism.
3. Sometimes there are dead give aways like the date chosen to do something: cretins like to specifically choose heathen holy days to commit seriously terrorist acts that they consider are crucial events to reaching their goals.
4. Ownership of media and who's in charge of the government. Hence anti-Hindu policies and anti-Hindu propaganda. <i>Christo</i>govt is appeasing islamic terrorism.
5. Character assassination is something christianism does, but islamism cannot do (islam is 400 years behind christianism when it comes to experience on How to Convert; islamism could try, but it will take centuries for it to become good at it).
Hindus have to start identifying christianism when it is the culprit in anti-Hindu terrorist acts even though it will not often leave its calling card. (Instead of wasting time by identifying superficial entities as the cause, like psecularism, maoism, or even using the wrong terminology like evangelicals, missionaries.)
- The fact that various kinds of christocommunists, the DMK and LTTE keep their actual ideology (christianism) safe from being identified and blamed in all their terrorist acts shows how successful christianism is.
- And christianism has an external facade, a faux-reputation if you will, of supposed peace, non-militancy, non-destructiveness. PR.
Hindus identify islamism as a threat but not christianism for these very reasons.
Christianism is conducting a covert war, a war of complete deniability.
Deniability and creating confusion. Examples:
- Cryptos. Use of Hindu names. Undeclared christians. Can only be identified by pro-christian actions, they do not tend to reveal their ideology. In fact, similar to how they usurp Hindu names for infiltration, they do the same in speech. That is, they do exactly what Karan Thapar does by saying "as a Hindu, I condemn <something related to Hindu Dharma>".
- Samuel Reddy (generally, his identity is concealed under his crypto name of YSR Reddy) diverting Hindu Temple donations to mostly haj subsidy and 'psecular' governmental policies. So he can argue that he is being secular. But his intention in taking Hindu Temple money is to drain and destroy Hindu temples. His intention is to destroy Hindu Dharma. And that comes from his <i>christian</i> motivation, even though less Hindu Temple money in AP is sent towards christianism than toward islamism and 'psecular' acts. Again, this makes it appear psecular.
- You find even aware Hindus wondering why certain newspapers will not publish their comments (such as those exposing the non-existence of St Thomas/his non-arrival in India). Hindus wonder, because the christian coverscreen of psecularism is that powerful. It does not draw suspicion to the actual core ideology of cretinism. People first wake to doubt the papers' motivations in doing this (describing it as just "anti-Hindu"), but do not ascribe it to the papers' particular ideological motivation (anti-Hindu *because* they're christian).
- In fact it is more powerful: even when aware Hindus <i>know</i> from their investigation that christianism is behind something, they still cannot provide the evidence if things are not public knowledge and cannot be verified by lay people.
For example, how Sandhya Jain has to refer to her reliable sources on having told her Prachanda, the Maoist usurper of Nepal, is a christian. Because he's not admitted it to the world officially. But some around him know and Sandhya Jain would have got it from there.
A second example: Hindus who don't rely on the christomedia in India know how cretins murdered Swami Lakshmanananda. The christians had attempted it 8 or 9 times before already. And they've left evidence of their pre-meditation in the final attempt. But because of the media blitzing on "maoists not christians" instead of "christian maoists", the whole situation got sidetracked and confused on purpose. The police investigation is motivated. The christians have pushed for another judge (one sympathetic to christoterrorism and anti-Hindu, see K.Ram's post on p.7 of this thread). This is the same kind of sidetracking/diversionary technique christogovt and media use in the war on real islamic terrorism (as opposed to the imaginary 'Hindu' terrorism).
Third example: No one says that the major part of the English language media in India is <i>christian</i>, when it is factually so. Ok, many out there don't know, but IF and at least intellibriefs have long known: others at IF had long ago posted an article here from IndiaTribune that showed how most of these media outlets were owned or funded by christian organisations. Yet even here, no one calls them christian media. (Neither does the DailyPioneer when referring to them.) And this is still more the case with Hindu sites outside IF: it is not considered among Hindus who still know about other matters.
These media outlets have generated some kind of protective barrier - false legitimacy, in spite of their ridiculously unfactual or otherwise one-sided reporting like the TOI regularly displays - in that no Hindu seems to want to say the obvious facts: that they are christian mouthpieces. <b>As a direct consequence of the non-transparency of the christianism of both the government and media</b>, you see Hindus unable to first think independently/unaffectedly on the latest issue: the media/govt manufacturing the fake notion of "Hindu Terrorism". Instead of Hindus doing the natural thing of doubting the motivated media and govt (motivated by christianism and its goals for destroying Hindu Dharma), they are doubting Hinduism. They are doubting the professionalism (even the foolish but real psecularism) of the Indian army. They are doubting everyone except the unreliables. <i>Because</i> they do not see the christianism of the government and media.
<b>ADDED:</b> Likewise, the whole Orissa nun rape case has got Hindus confused as well. Instead of asking the actual questions one should be asking and taking the entire context into account (how it is obviously timed to divert from Swami Lakshmanananda's murder, asking questions on whether she was really raped and if so <i>who</i> did it), Hindus are instead automatically jumping onto the backfoot and trying to distance themselves from a likely to be <i>manufactured</i> event: they go so far as assuming that the Hindus accused are guilty. Just like they automatically assume that the random Hindus accused by the bogey of 'Hindu Terrorism' must be guilty of (yet another) imaginary crime. Hindus a) assume the imaginary crimes and b) assume the guilt of the Hindus accused without looking into the history of how there has never been Hindu terrorism, only christoislamic terrorism/militancy; and how previous Orissa nun rape cases were all proven to be christian inventions.
Fourth example: Hindus who are aware, have to take into account circumstancial indicators to work out it is christianism.
Radha Rajan writes at
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2008/11/th...-trigerred.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>"This is violence in Chennai trigerred by dalit christians I will wager everything I have".</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->But the original news article that she refers to with her title can only say
"Law college violence: Politics, casteism to blame".
The article blames the casteism promoted by the (christo) DMK, and also says that the Tamizh police should have done more to handle the situation. But Radha writes:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If this was between caste Hindus and dalits, then this is violence triggered by dalit Christians I will wager everything I have. These dalit christian students were probably goaded into this by usual suspects in politics and the charity industry. If this were simply caste violence dear Karunanidhi would have written one of his abusive anti-Hindu pieces or spoken about it. The fact that there is deafening silence from all political quarters except to rile against the police tells me that I am right that this was not caste violence but something else violence deliberately ignited to push the caste Hindus into a corner. The best way to arrive at the truth about minorities in this country is when the media remains silent about the identity of the criminals. Like Romilla Thapar and co.'s history books -- the invaders are never Muslim -- slave dynasty, Turks, Mongols, Mughals. Ditto here. This silence is the silence of a thief stung by a scorpion. It suits them to say dalit vs. caste Hindus instead of tribal christian or dalit christian vs. Hindus.
-- Radha Rajan
(full version of her text here)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Shows how even aware Hindus who can add 2 and 2 have to use (obvious) inferential data to come to the conclusion that christianism was behind the event. Apparently, she later found more explicit data for how she was right. See the last part of Bodhi's post 218 above.
All these clever people - from the lovely Sandhya Jain and Radha Rajan to Daily Pioneer and even IF - are struggling. Even when they know, they cannot say because of self-censorship or because of lack of the sort of evidence that can immediately be understood by other Hindus (without explaining to them the subtle but particular indicators of christianism).
That's how powerful cretinism's methods are in India. That's what is making it so successful in getting away scott-free.
It is very hard to expose crypto-cretins and crypto-christianism=psecularism. Most Hindus are the believing kind: they take you at face value. This is an honest trait, but it is being used against them.
Hindus are not prepared for the kind of war christianism proposes (or rather, has long begun). This is again different from how Hindus are also not prepared for the total war of islamism. If Hindus think communism is the master of dawaganda/doublespeak/brainwashing/mental manipulation warfare, they have no idea how christianism takes this up by several notches. Communism is blatant. Christianism is not. Christianism makes murder look like suicide, and genocide look an accident or no more than an inevitable natural/historical disaster.
To protect Hindu Dharma from christianism, there's at least two types of things Hindus have to do:
1. Find ways to bypass the psecular arm of christian terrorism. (Such as christogovt's diversion of Hindu temple funds which is being used to destroy Hindu Dharma.)
2. Expose christianism for the horrendous lie it is. It is hard to expose crypto-cretinism (psecularism) to less aware Hindus as being christianism. But if the root cause (christianism) were itself made ineffectual then crypto-christianism will evaporate too.
Also, sometimes the real religious affiliation of crypto-cretins is revealed, like that of Margaret Suzanna 'Arundhati' Roy. When it happens, Hindus should expose such entities to the rest of the Hindu community.
Tales from the broken record: need to take christianism very seriously, it is no joke. It has more chance of succeeding than islamism. Because jihad cannot be hidden. Cretinism's subterfuge is hidden - in terminology, in non-transparency of ownership, in unapparent motivations, in blatantly christian situations that the media covers up and confuses (Swami's murder), and in psecular-looking events whose actors and motivations alone can make clear that they are christian. Christianism looks invisible to Hindus' eyes. And that's an additional factor in its potent deadliness; Hindus are not fighting the armed christomaniacs from colonial Portugal anymore. They're not even fighting the sort of eventually-seethrough subterfuge of the christomaniacs from colonial Britain. For most Hindus, the situation now is comparable to being able to recognise whether the Indian-looking person in front of you is Hindu or christian; the same level of difficulty.
In any case, self-censorship on the Hindu's part is <i>the last</i> thing we should be doing. Hindus should hone their skills in reading between the lines. Like when Karan Thapar says all of "I'm a Hindu, but I am opposed to <something very Hindu Dharma>" in one breath, Hindus should stop falling for the first bit and take note of the last.
(1) Evidence collected by the lovely Dr Kalyanaraman on the very ChristoTerrorist murder of Swami Lakshmanananda. Over two posts at
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/search/lab...mananda%20Swami
- <b>Christist conspiracy in assassination of Swami Lakshamananda: evidence.</b>
- <b>Evidence re: assassination of Swami Lakshamananda. Christian conspiracy unravels</b>
Includes text of the cretins/christians' resolution to murder the heroic Swami
and which Ashok Sahu, IPS (Retd.), Former Addl. Director General of Police, referred to, see here and here.
(2) <b>Kerala Christian appointed Chief Justice (CJ) to the Patna (Bihar High Court).</b>
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2008/11/im...ef-justice.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->from: Radha Rajan
date: Sat, Nov 15, 2008 at 4:20 AM
subject: Re: Important - Orissa Chief Justice
A correction, he is appointed CJ to the Patna (Bihar High Court).
CJ Supreme Court KG Balakrishnan suffers from the worst reputation. In Kerala his brother KG Bhaskaran is disparagingly referred to as "collection agent". KG Balakrishnan's son-in-law is supposed to be close friends with Rahul Gandhi.
Read together with what is happening in law colleges across Tamil Nadu and the future doesn't look good for the quality of judges.
-- RR
* * *
(The following were all links off the above
"This is violence in Chennai trigerred by dalit christians I will wager everything I have".
Law college violence: Politics, casteism to blame
* * *
Missionaries are engaged in aggressive proselytizing and blasphemous propaganda against Hindu deities
Christian organizations justify conversions by saying that tribals are not Hindus.
Clinching evidences of Christian involvement in the assassination of Swami Lakshmanandaji: Ashok Singhal
In Orissa, the fundamentalist Christian missionaries have detected a fertile ground for spreading their poisonous culture.
Mao & Christ Come Together in Orissa
http://journalchretien.net/breve14777.html
Labels: Orissa Chief Justice<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(3) http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/search/lab...mananda%20Swami
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->ORISSA GOVERNMENT MUST APPREHEND FORTHWITH
KILLERS OF VEN. SWAMI LAKSHMANANANDAJI
-- Ashok Singhal
New Delhi, October 02, 2008 - Furious over the failure of the Orissa Government in apprehending any assassin of Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji Saraswati, Shri Ashok Singhal, International President of VHP said, âIt is a matter of grave concern of all Hindus in India & abroad that Christians dared to assassinate Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji - a Hindu icon of Orissa and revered Dharmacharya of India - on August 23, 2008. I met the Chief Minister of Orissa Shri Navin Patnaik a month ago with clinching evidences of Christian involvement in the assassination and urged him to apprehend the culprits. The date the X'ians chose for the heinous act had a loud statement - that is, it was Sri Krishna Janmashtami - one of the most auspicious days of Hindu calendar - and it was also the foundation day of Vishva Hindu Parishad, and, the Christians wanted to dare the Hindu society on that day by offering to Jesus for his pleasure the assassinated bodies of Hindu monks. But the State Government has not yet apprehended any X'ian mercenary and/or accomplice. It is because of the influence of the Church and their NGOs. The government has arrested hundreds of Hindus, but practically no Christian. I requested the Chief Minister to take under his command directly the entire enquiry module regarding the case that has wide implications and apprehend the culprits at the earliest. But, the new Director General of Police - Orissa is indiscriminately arresting leaders of Hindu organizations that are not related to any case. Those must be released forthwith whom the government has arrested with political motivation. We wish that normalcy returns to Orissa as soon as possible. But, it appears that the government itself is not interested in the return of normalcy, as it is interested in giving the culprits a free run. As long as the over-ground kingpin of the assassination conspiracy - Mr. Radhakant Nayak is not apprehended, the deep roots of the conspiracy and the faces of the remote kingpins that outsourced the assassination module cannot be unearthed, and, consequently, the situation won't become normal. The government must remember that Ven. Swami Lakshmananandaji - a high-stature Dharmacharya of the country coming from a Tribal region of Orissa, a socio-cultural worker par excellence whose activities always remained aligned with the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A of the Constitution of India, who rightly opposed aggressive religious conversions through force, fraud and inducement, who was particularly against the entry of foreign-funded Missionaries in the "scheduled areas" of the country as that violated the indigenous culture, traditions and moorings of the Tribal people, who was for 'propagation' of religion under Art. 25(1) of Constitution (this right is for Indian citizens only), but rightly quoted the Supreme Court ruling that 'propagation' does not mean 'right to convert', who quoted the Niyogi Commission Report and the Orissa Freedom of Religion Act & Rules, 1987 & 1989 against conversions, and who was an uncompromising protagonist of robust nationalism, has been assassinated by the Christians."
Shri Singhal asked the Government of Orissa that "for the cause of peace, it must be up & doing in apprehending the assassins and their accomplices at the earliest."
- Released by Vishwa Samvad Kendra, New Delhi<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
(4) The biggest problem is that Hindus are unable to identify christoterrorism, christianism's hand behind many events. In fact, Swami Lakshmanananda's murder is one of the more blatant instances and even there Hindus get confused about 'maoists' as if these are separate from cretins/christians.
Unlike islamism, christianism is no longer advertising in loudspeakers what it is doing. Most things are done very covertly. Some of the simpler signs to tell what is caused by christianism, but many Hindus are confused or not aware of even these.
1. Christianism always uses the psecular arm=a christocontrolled (or otherwise a christofavourable) govt to accomplish what it cannot do directly. E.g. programmatic destruction of temples by stealing their money to let them disintegrate out of lack of maintenance and funds, and <i>in the same stroke</i> promoting the forces inimical to Hindu Dharma (christoislamism) with the same money.
Psecular arm today also includes dawaganda=media.
2. The Joshua Project's subproject Project Thessalonica outlines its intentions and how it wants to achieve them. It's intentions are another way to gauge what anti-Hindu events are due to christoterrorism.
3. Sometimes there are dead give aways like the date chosen to do something: cretins like to specifically choose heathen holy days to commit seriously terrorist acts that they consider are crucial events to reaching their goals.
4. Ownership of media and who's in charge of the government. Hence anti-Hindu policies and anti-Hindu propaganda. <i>Christo</i>govt is appeasing islamic terrorism.
5. Character assassination is something christianism does, but islamism cannot do (islam is 400 years behind christianism when it comes to experience on How to Convert; islamism could try, but it will take centuries for it to become good at it).
Hindus have to start identifying christianism when it is the culprit in anti-Hindu terrorist acts even though it will not often leave its calling card. (Instead of wasting time by identifying superficial entities as the cause, like psecularism, maoism, or even using the wrong terminology like evangelicals, missionaries.)
- The fact that various kinds of christocommunists, the DMK and LTTE keep their actual ideology (christianism) safe from being identified and blamed in all their terrorist acts shows how successful christianism is.
- And christianism has an external facade, a faux-reputation if you will, of supposed peace, non-militancy, non-destructiveness. PR.
Hindus identify islamism as a threat but not christianism for these very reasons.
Christianism is conducting a covert war, a war of complete deniability.
Deniability and creating confusion. Examples:
- Cryptos. Use of Hindu names. Undeclared christians. Can only be identified by pro-christian actions, they do not tend to reveal their ideology. In fact, similar to how they usurp Hindu names for infiltration, they do the same in speech. That is, they do exactly what Karan Thapar does by saying "as a Hindu, I condemn <something related to Hindu Dharma>".
- Samuel Reddy (generally, his identity is concealed under his crypto name of YSR Reddy) diverting Hindu Temple donations to mostly haj subsidy and 'psecular' governmental policies. So he can argue that he is being secular. But his intention in taking Hindu Temple money is to drain and destroy Hindu temples. His intention is to destroy Hindu Dharma. And that comes from his <i>christian</i> motivation, even though less Hindu Temple money in AP is sent towards christianism than toward islamism and 'psecular' acts. Again, this makes it appear psecular.
- You find even aware Hindus wondering why certain newspapers will not publish their comments (such as those exposing the non-existence of St Thomas/his non-arrival in India). Hindus wonder, because the christian coverscreen of psecularism is that powerful. It does not draw suspicion to the actual core ideology of cretinism. People first wake to doubt the papers' motivations in doing this (describing it as just "anti-Hindu"), but do not ascribe it to the papers' particular ideological motivation (anti-Hindu *because* they're christian).
- In fact it is more powerful: even when aware Hindus <i>know</i> from their investigation that christianism is behind something, they still cannot provide the evidence if things are not public knowledge and cannot be verified by lay people.
For example, how Sandhya Jain has to refer to her reliable sources on having told her Prachanda, the Maoist usurper of Nepal, is a christian. Because he's not admitted it to the world officially. But some around him know and Sandhya Jain would have got it from there.
A second example: Hindus who don't rely on the christomedia in India know how cretins murdered Swami Lakshmanananda. The christians had attempted it 8 or 9 times before already. And they've left evidence of their pre-meditation in the final attempt. But because of the media blitzing on "maoists not christians" instead of "christian maoists", the whole situation got sidetracked and confused on purpose. The police investigation is motivated. The christians have pushed for another judge (one sympathetic to christoterrorism and anti-Hindu, see K.Ram's post on p.7 of this thread). This is the same kind of sidetracking/diversionary technique christogovt and media use in the war on real islamic terrorism (as opposed to the imaginary 'Hindu' terrorism).
Third example: No one says that the major part of the English language media in India is <i>christian</i>, when it is factually so. Ok, many out there don't know, but IF and at least intellibriefs have long known: others at IF had long ago posted an article here from IndiaTribune that showed how most of these media outlets were owned or funded by christian organisations. Yet even here, no one calls them christian media. (Neither does the DailyPioneer when referring to them.) And this is still more the case with Hindu sites outside IF: it is not considered among Hindus who still know about other matters.
These media outlets have generated some kind of protective barrier - false legitimacy, in spite of their ridiculously unfactual or otherwise one-sided reporting like the TOI regularly displays - in that no Hindu seems to want to say the obvious facts: that they are christian mouthpieces. <b>As a direct consequence of the non-transparency of the christianism of both the government and media</b>, you see Hindus unable to first think independently/unaffectedly on the latest issue: the media/govt manufacturing the fake notion of "Hindu Terrorism". Instead of Hindus doing the natural thing of doubting the motivated media and govt (motivated by christianism and its goals for destroying Hindu Dharma), they are doubting Hinduism. They are doubting the professionalism (even the foolish but real psecularism) of the Indian army. They are doubting everyone except the unreliables. <i>Because</i> they do not see the christianism of the government and media.
<b>ADDED:</b> Likewise, the whole Orissa nun rape case has got Hindus confused as well. Instead of asking the actual questions one should be asking and taking the entire context into account (how it is obviously timed to divert from Swami Lakshmanananda's murder, asking questions on whether she was really raped and if so <i>who</i> did it), Hindus are instead automatically jumping onto the backfoot and trying to distance themselves from a likely to be <i>manufactured</i> event: they go so far as assuming that the Hindus accused are guilty. Just like they automatically assume that the random Hindus accused by the bogey of 'Hindu Terrorism' must be guilty of (yet another) imaginary crime. Hindus a) assume the imaginary crimes and b) assume the guilt of the Hindus accused without looking into the history of how there has never been Hindu terrorism, only christoislamic terrorism/militancy; and how previous Orissa nun rape cases were all proven to be christian inventions.
Fourth example: Hindus who are aware, have to take into account circumstancial indicators to work out it is christianism.
Radha Rajan writes at
http://vivekajyoti.blogspot.com/2008/11/th...-trigerred.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>"This is violence in Chennai trigerred by dalit christians I will wager everything I have".</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->But the original news article that she refers to with her title can only say
"Law college violence: Politics, casteism to blame".
The article blames the casteism promoted by the (christo) DMK, and also says that the Tamizh police should have done more to handle the situation. But Radha writes:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If this was between caste Hindus and dalits, then this is violence triggered by dalit Christians I will wager everything I have. These dalit christian students were probably goaded into this by usual suspects in politics and the charity industry. If this were simply caste violence dear Karunanidhi would have written one of his abusive anti-Hindu pieces or spoken about it. The fact that there is deafening silence from all political quarters except to rile against the police tells me that I am right that this was not caste violence but something else violence deliberately ignited to push the caste Hindus into a corner. The best way to arrive at the truth about minorities in this country is when the media remains silent about the identity of the criminals. Like Romilla Thapar and co.'s history books -- the invaders are never Muslim -- slave dynasty, Turks, Mongols, Mughals. Ditto here. This silence is the silence of a thief stung by a scorpion. It suits them to say dalit vs. caste Hindus instead of tribal christian or dalit christian vs. Hindus.
-- Radha Rajan
(full version of her text here)<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Shows how even aware Hindus who can add 2 and 2 have to use (obvious) inferential data to come to the conclusion that christianism was behind the event. Apparently, she later found more explicit data for how she was right. See the last part of Bodhi's post 218 above.
All these clever people - from the lovely Sandhya Jain and Radha Rajan to Daily Pioneer and even IF - are struggling. Even when they know, they cannot say because of self-censorship or because of lack of the sort of evidence that can immediately be understood by other Hindus (without explaining to them the subtle but particular indicators of christianism).
That's how powerful cretinism's methods are in India. That's what is making it so successful in getting away scott-free.
It is very hard to expose crypto-cretins and crypto-christianism=psecularism. Most Hindus are the believing kind: they take you at face value. This is an honest trait, but it is being used against them.
Hindus are not prepared for the kind of war christianism proposes (or rather, has long begun). This is again different from how Hindus are also not prepared for the total war of islamism. If Hindus think communism is the master of dawaganda/doublespeak/brainwashing/mental manipulation warfare, they have no idea how christianism takes this up by several notches. Communism is blatant. Christianism is not. Christianism makes murder look like suicide, and genocide look an accident or no more than an inevitable natural/historical disaster.
To protect Hindu Dharma from christianism, there's at least two types of things Hindus have to do:
1. Find ways to bypass the psecular arm of christian terrorism. (Such as christogovt's diversion of Hindu temple funds which is being used to destroy Hindu Dharma.)
2. Expose christianism for the horrendous lie it is. It is hard to expose crypto-cretinism (psecularism) to less aware Hindus as being christianism. But if the root cause (christianism) were itself made ineffectual then crypto-christianism will evaporate too.
Also, sometimes the real religious affiliation of crypto-cretins is revealed, like that of Margaret Suzanna 'Arundhati' Roy. When it happens, Hindus should expose such entities to the rest of the Hindu community.
Tales from the broken record: need to take christianism very seriously, it is no joke. It has more chance of succeeding than islamism. Because jihad cannot be hidden. Cretinism's subterfuge is hidden - in terminology, in non-transparency of ownership, in unapparent motivations, in blatantly christian situations that the media covers up and confuses (Swami's murder), and in psecular-looking events whose actors and motivations alone can make clear that they are christian. Christianism looks invisible to Hindus' eyes. And that's an additional factor in its potent deadliness; Hindus are not fighting the armed christomaniacs from colonial Portugal anymore. They're not even fighting the sort of eventually-seethrough subterfuge of the christomaniacs from colonial Britain. For most Hindus, the situation now is comparable to being able to recognise whether the Indian-looking person in front of you is Hindu or christian; the same level of difficulty.
In any case, self-censorship on the Hindu's part is <i>the last</i> thing we should be doing. Hindus should hone their skills in reading between the lines. Like when Karan Thapar says all of "I'm a Hindu, but I am opposed to <something very Hindu Dharma>" in one breath, Hindus should stop falling for the first bit and take note of the last.
Death to traitors.