Rama Setu -1

[ramana]

If it helps anything here is a version of the what was argued

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->As BJP spokesman Ravi Shankar Prasad was quick to observe <b>the affidavit had been filed by the Union Government's Ministry of Culture, which was under senior Congress leader Ambika Soni.

"So far, we thought opposition to Ram Setu was primarily from the Union Minister for Surface Transport and Shipping TR Balu, who represents the DMK in the ruling alliance," he said.

Interestingly, Balu's Ministry had already filed an affidavit in the apex court in connection with the same case on Monday.</b>

But that affidavit confined itself to stating that there was no scientific evidence proving that Ram Setu was a man-made bridge.

<b>The latest affidavit filed by a Ministry under the charge of Congress leader Ambika Soni went beyond this and challenged the historicity of the characters and events in the entire gamut of the Ram pantheon itself. </b>
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

So this was a Modernist attack and not required for the arguement against the case. The DMK was more rational.

There is an issue of attacking the core beliefs of people especially with government backing. If the Constitution says India is secular what business is it of the Govt to argue that a core belief of one religion is a historical. How does that reconcile with secularism? Why the selective attack on Hindu beliefs only?