11-03-2005, 06:06 PM
Guleria, you still haven't refuted the points raised by me... that means you agree that historically Rajputs have collborated with Mughals in politics of power in 18th century... of course there was resistance too from Rajput side but come on you can't change facts by raising your voice and cursing...
I am typing a paragraph from Qanungo's book on history of Jats about how Bhishan singh collaborated with Muslim to fight against Jats of Bharatpur...
"After the death of Rajaram,... the new Raja of Amber(Jaipur), was appointed by the Emperor as faujdar of Mathura with special charge to root out Jats and take Sinsini as his own jagir. He gave the Emperor written undertaking....(details) and... Mughals stormed the fort after three hours of stubborn opposition. Jats disputed every inch of the ground and were dispersed only after losing 1500 of their men. On the imperial side 200 Mughals fell and 700 Rajputs were slain or wounded."
Do you have anything to say on that? Come on, even history textbooks praise Rajput and Mughal collaboration. Of course there was resistance too, thats why I said Rana pratap and Prithviraj... But struggle of Jats is either unknown or undermined by people who have psyche like you...
Everybody known that among all internal factors the Brahamnical society has been most resposible for the degradation of Hinduism. During Vedic period there was not rigid caste structure but it was laid down later by Brahims to their benefit.
Let me mention other historical account. Jats were not strong enough to Ghazni face to face but they used to plunder their retreating army. Every time it used to happen. After Somnath's plunder Jat ransacked Ghazni's army and took booties. Brahmins of that region asked Jats to get rid of impure idols because it is made impure by muslim and there was clash. Jats were never given proper place their deserve in Hinduism, until the work done by Swami Dyandand....
But I don't mean to spread hatred of one community... History shd be studied objectively rather than to bring your personal views in between...
Som
[/quote]
I am typing a paragraph from Qanungo's book on history of Jats about how Bhishan singh collaborated with Muslim to fight against Jats of Bharatpur...
"After the death of Rajaram,... the new Raja of Amber(Jaipur), was appointed by the Emperor as faujdar of Mathura with special charge to root out Jats and take Sinsini as his own jagir. He gave the Emperor written undertaking....(details) and... Mughals stormed the fort after three hours of stubborn opposition. Jats disputed every inch of the ground and were dispersed only after losing 1500 of their men. On the imperial side 200 Mughals fell and 700 Rajputs were slain or wounded."
Do you have anything to say on that? Come on, even history textbooks praise Rajput and Mughal collaboration. Of course there was resistance too, thats why I said Rana pratap and Prithviraj... But struggle of Jats is either unknown or undermined by people who have psyche like you...
Everybody known that among all internal factors the Brahamnical society has been most resposible for the degradation of Hinduism. During Vedic period there was not rigid caste structure but it was laid down later by Brahims to their benefit.
Let me mention other historical account. Jats were not strong enough to Ghazni face to face but they used to plunder their retreating army. Every time it used to happen. After Somnath's plunder Jat ransacked Ghazni's army and took booties. Brahmins of that region asked Jats to get rid of impure idols because it is made impure by muslim and there was clash. Jats were never given proper place their deserve in Hinduism, until the work done by Swami Dyandand....
But I don't mean to spread hatred of one community... History shd be studied objectively rather than to bring your personal views in between...
Som
PC Guleria,Nov 3 2005, 01:59 PM Wrote:Traitors are those who try to glorify their community by denigrating and falsifying the history of other communitiesâthis applies to that other postor and you.[right][snapback]40564[/snapback][/right]
As for your other rambling speech (yawn) Iâll just repeat some of my other posts.
On the so-called Jat resistance:
[/quote]