12-10-2004, 07:34 AM
Note this law suit
<b> Described as a senior CIA official who was sacked in August "for unspecified reasons," the lawsuit appeared to be the first public instance of a CIA agent charging he was pressured to concoct intelligence on Iraq.
The suit claims the unidentified ex agent was urged to produce reports in line with President George W Bush's contention that Iraq had illegal chemical or biological weapons, which threatened US and international security.</b>
This illustrates that the re-elected government is trying hard to bottle all the mis-information that it engaged in to prevent a scandal. I am sure these are controlled lleaks. They prevented any leaks from happening before the elections. Now they are trying to instigate a controlled burn out of the material to avoid a Watergate affair.
Another point to ponder about is the Chalabi incident. Why did Kerry not use something as damning the Chalabi incident to maximum advantage in the election campaign. Evidently, neo-cons are an immense force who are the real shakers and movers in DC. Democrats or Republicans they are only external forces, who ever comes the neo-con network runs the show from behind. This shows that Neo-conism is a movement unrelated to classical American conservatism, instead it is a bipartisan movement with its own global agenda, where Bush is merely a tool for their game. This is an important point to note.
<b> Described as a senior CIA official who was sacked in August "for unspecified reasons," the lawsuit appeared to be the first public instance of a CIA agent charging he was pressured to concoct intelligence on Iraq.
The suit claims the unidentified ex agent was urged to produce reports in line with President George W Bush's contention that Iraq had illegal chemical or biological weapons, which threatened US and international security.</b>
This illustrates that the re-elected government is trying hard to bottle all the mis-information that it engaged in to prevent a scandal. I am sure these are controlled lleaks. They prevented any leaks from happening before the elections. Now they are trying to instigate a controlled burn out of the material to avoid a Watergate affair.
Another point to ponder about is the Chalabi incident. Why did Kerry not use something as damning the Chalabi incident to maximum advantage in the election campaign. Evidently, neo-cons are an immense force who are the real shakers and movers in DC. Democrats or Republicans they are only external forces, who ever comes the neo-con network runs the show from behind. This shows that Neo-conism is a movement unrelated to classical American conservatism, instead it is a bipartisan movement with its own global agenda, where Bush is merely a tool for their game. This is an important point to note.