05-14-2005, 08:41 PM
I am the least concerned with the existence or inexistence of Iskcon. Carl, your mention that Gangajal and I are baiting you is akin to calling the crow calling the swan black. I did not bother much with the discussion till you started carelessly throwing words like MAYAVAAD (for which I asked an explanation - which is yet to be given), and started taking a stance where Vivekananda and other True representatives of Vaidika Dharma were belittled, abused, or otherwise made fun of with subtle derogatory remarks. YOU were the one provoking and making uncalled for statements.
Your last post mentions the word "Mayavad" 15 times. Infact, it is incumbent upon me to correct your skewed vision and make you see the light for your own good. Your Iskcon and its false religious positioning is quite disturbing. Quite frankly, it is a well known fact that Iskcon and it's idealogies has lot more to be desired. It is only a missionary style organized religion with hindu sounding names. (I am not even mentioning the child-abuse that goes on within the walls if that is some track record.)
I tried softening the stance by saying I AM interested in your posts. If you continue using the term Mayavaad, you give me no other option but to rightly use the epithet Moorkhavaad for what you say. Your tone is quite patronizing, your stance is pretty arrogant and you have the nerve to say that to me and Gangajal.
You have a lot to learn from your own advise and mine too. If you choose to continue down this argumentative path, so be it. But if you can see the light and respect Vaidika Dharma, then we have lot more to share and less to fight about.
Your last post mentions the word "Mayavad" 15 times. Infact, it is incumbent upon me to correct your skewed vision and make you see the light for your own good. Your Iskcon and its false religious positioning is quite disturbing. Quite frankly, it is a well known fact that Iskcon and it's idealogies has lot more to be desired. It is only a missionary style organized religion with hindu sounding names. (I am not even mentioning the child-abuse that goes on within the walls if that is some track record.)
I tried softening the stance by saying I AM interested in your posts. If you continue using the term Mayavaad, you give me no other option but to rightly use the epithet Moorkhavaad for what you say. Your tone is quite patronizing, your stance is pretty arrogant and you have the nerve to say that to me and Gangajal.
You have a lot to learn from your own advise and mine too. If you choose to continue down this argumentative path, so be it. But if you can see the light and respect Vaidika Dharma, then we have lot more to share and less to fight about.