12-12-2005, 01:30 AM
yes. when gandhi and nehru ganged up on netaji - basically up-bihar-rajasthan and mp ganged up on bengal.
bengalis can never connect with the gandhi-nehru highjacked congress.
and now that they have become commie since 77, they have become ever more divorced from the centre.
if bengal doesnt contribute minister at the centre - its good news now. we dont want what happened to bengal (deindustrialisation) to be repeated at the centre.
unfortunately for the land that single handedly produced almost half the original leaders of the congress - now not a single congress leader emerges from that state anymore - such has been the clinical hammering of all opposition by the cpim. and MB is nothing like a surendra nath bannerjee.
the saving grace is that - after being shunted out of the equation by gandhi and nehru - the antidote of the anglo-socialistic party called the congress has also come from a bengali and was founded in calcutta.
bengalis can never connect with the gandhi-nehru highjacked congress.
and now that they have become commie since 77, they have become ever more divorced from the centre.
if bengal doesnt contribute minister at the centre - its good news now. we dont want what happened to bengal (deindustrialisation) to be repeated at the centre.
unfortunately for the land that single handedly produced almost half the original leaders of the congress - now not a single congress leader emerges from that state anymore - such has been the clinical hammering of all opposition by the cpim. and MB is nothing like a surendra nath bannerjee.
the saving grace is that - after being shunted out of the equation by gandhi and nehru - the antidote of the anglo-socialistic party called the congress has also come from a bengali and was founded in calcutta.