Related to #445 and actually also #443 above.
Powerpoint: aryaninvasionmyth.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/eurasiatic-review-of-pagel-2013.ppsx
via aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/criticism-of-ultraconserved-words-point-to-deep-language-ancestry-across-eurasia/
Doesn't focus on IE, but primarily about dispersal of Uralic and Altaic etc language families, also from an OIT model (which makes sense considering the early times involved). Kartvelian and Basque is also explained.
Deeper time frames make sense.
And ANI/ASI is also better explained visually here.
When read in conjuction with at least the pages linked in the previous post (also below), can mentally extrapolate the configuration in the powerpoint for the spread of so-called "IE" languages from within India as shown in the author's repeated migration model and as per the timeline he gives for this. Surely it is worth considering now and no longer of blanket odium, since Robin Kar Bradley* (and who knows how many others), seen in post 443, has already admitted OIT in his legal context and self-evidently - as implied in the illegally self-aggrandising "The origins 'western' civilisation (in the indus valley)" of his title. And he specifically stated in his article's abstract
[* 'Cause Indians always need Euro approval. And what better than the approval by those Euros who are still obviously antagonistic - who, even as they admit OIT, they continue to claim away anyway? And although Bradley did not speak of the Indus Valley being in "South Asia" or "India/Pakistan" but in the Indian subcontinent, it is only because he is regarding natural geography not political geography of the time, certainly not religious geography of the time in question or the religio-political one of the present. The west was always adamant that Vedic India has no relation to modern Hindoos and their nation.]
Along with the author's response at "June 6, 2013 at 8:43 pm" to a comment's question on that last page aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/3/
The author's argument about focusing on the Mus (mouse) migrations - which repeatedly accompanied humans out of India - as these are non-controversial, is quite reasonable.
This was a bit disturbing:
aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/3/
Powerpoint: aryaninvasionmyth.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/eurasiatic-review-of-pagel-2013.ppsx
via aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/criticism-of-ultraconserved-words-point-to-deep-language-ancestry-across-eurasia/
Doesn't focus on IE, but primarily about dispersal of Uralic and Altaic etc language families, also from an OIT model (which makes sense considering the early times involved). Kartvelian and Basque is also explained.
Deeper time frames make sense.
And ANI/ASI is also better explained visually here.
When read in conjuction with at least the pages linked in the previous post (also below), can mentally extrapolate the configuration in the powerpoint for the spread of so-called "IE" languages from within India as shown in the author's repeated migration model and as per the timeline he gives for this. Surely it is worth considering now and no longer of blanket odium, since Robin Kar Bradley* (and who knows how many others), seen in post 443, has already admitted OIT in his legal context and self-evidently - as implied in the illegally self-aggrandising "The origins 'western' civilisation (in the indus valley)" of his title. And he specifically stated in his article's abstract
Quote:Rather, the West is descended from a much deeper cultural tradition, which extends all the way back to some of our first human forays out of hunter-gatherer modes of subsistence and into settled agricultural living. The tradition in question began not in Greece, Rome, or Israel, however, but rather in the Indus Valley - which is a region that spans the Northwestern portions of the Indian subcontinent.
[* 'Cause Indians always need Euro approval. And what better than the approval by those Euros who are still obviously antagonistic - who, even as they admit OIT, they continue to claim away anyway? And although Bradley did not speak of the Indus Valley being in "South Asia" or "India/Pakistan" but in the Indian subcontinent, it is only because he is regarding natural geography not political geography of the time, certainly not religious geography of the time in question or the religio-political one of the present. The west was always adamant that Vedic India has no relation to modern Hindoos and their nation.]
- aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2014/01/14/the-vedic-history-revealed-from-the-fossil-pollens/
- aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/18/origin-of-the-light-sivalensis-type-horse-from-india/
- aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/3/
Along with the author's response at "June 6, 2013 at 8:43 pm" to a comment's question on that last page aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/3/
The author's argument about focusing on the Mus (mouse) migrations - which repeatedly accompanied humans out of India - as these are non-controversial, is quite reasonable.
This was a bit disturbing:
aryaninvasionmyth.wordpress.com/2012/10/01/3/
Quote:no DNA comparison of the Indian and European horses has ever been madeActually, that's telling in itself.