Nexus Between Entities Influencing India

[Husky]

4 different news items.



1. Just in case there's any doubt over any of the 4 points in the quoteblock of the previous post, here's evidence for the first:



thehindu.com/news/national/other-states/chargesheet-filed-against-3-in-bodh-gaya-blast-case/article6708603.ece

Chargesheet filed against 3 in Bodh Gaya blast case



The National Investigation Agency (NIA) Special Court in Patna has framed charges against Haider Ali, Mujibullah and Taufique Ansari in the Bodh Gaya serial blasts that rocked the world-renowned Buddhist shrine last year. The accused were allegedly members of the banned outfit SIMI.



The charges were framed under provisions of the Unlawful Activities Prevention Act of 1967, Explosive Substances Act and the Indian Penal Code. The NIA through its scientific investigation had established that Haider Ali and his associates conspired to target the Buddhist sites to avenge the alleged atrocities on Rohingya Muslims in Myanmar, a NIA press release said.

(Oh please. As if islamaniacs ever needed an excuse to destroy Buddhist temples and sites. Islamaniacs *like* destroying the sacred sites of kaffirs. When caught they merely try to find excuses. If Burmese Buddhists hadn't kicked out Rohingya islamaniacs, then the SIMI trio would have used SL Buddhist persecution of islamic mosques as an excuse.)



Keywords: NIA, Bodh Gaya blasts

Neo-Buddhists and dravoodianists writing tract after tract of what they know to be lies - that Hindoos destroyed Buddhist/Jain temples etc - will no doubt pretend they didn't read the above news and still be peddling their christian (well, neo-Buddhists and dravoodianists ARE christians, cryptos) stories framing Hindoos for the Bodh Gaya blast instead, as taught by their western puppeteers of the kind that set up USCIRF.





2. Every para in the following contains some revelation or other:



sunday-guardian.com/news/ford-foundation-looks-at-rajan-as-saviour

Ford Foundation looks at [Raghuram] Rajan as saviour



Financial entities have been contacted by Ford Foundation to intercede with RBI Governor [Raghuram] Rajan and Economic Advisor to Finance Ministry, Arvind Subramanian.



MADHAV NALAPAT New Delhi | 9th May 2015



The Ford Foundation is lobbying to use US economic leverage over India to get the Narendra Modi government to roll back the action taken against the organisation, high-level sources in Washington and New York say.They claim that financial entities with considerable influence in India, such as Goldman Sachs (which is known to have privileged access to North Block) and Citibank (which enjoys similar privileges with the Reserve Bank of India) have been contacted by senior Foundation officials to intercede with, among others, RBI Governor Raghuram Rajan and Economic Advisor to the Ministry of Finance, Arvind Subramanian, to "persuade the Modi government to drop the measures" enforced against the prestigious body, including the transfer of responsibility for clearing of foreign donations from the Ministry of Finance (which to date has yet to look askance at a request from the well-connected US funder) to the less sympathetic Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA). This was done through bringing the Ford Foundation into the "Prior Reference Category" (PRC), which in fact has been the only substantive action that has been taken in the case of the Foundation. However, this limited action has been sufficient to lead to US Secretary of State John Kerry (who according to sources in Washington had a meeting with Ford Foundation president Darren Walker hours after the Indian decision was announced) instructing his spokesperson to issue a strongly-worded statement against the decision by the Government of India. Soon after the rebuke from the State Department, the head of another major US-based foundation was sent back from Delhi airport after being refused permission to enter this country, in a message that Team Modi would not buckle to pressure the way the Manmohan Singh government was frequently accused of doing.



Sources in New York claim that the Ford-friendly US envoy to the United Nations, Samantha Power, has been lobbying hectically on behalf of Ford to get the UN Secretary-General to join the State Department in condemning India, although thus far, criticism from this quarter has been absent. However, six Senators are known to have interceded on behalf of the Foundation with the Obama administration, leading to open pressure from US envoy Richard Verma. Sources in Delhi say that the shift of the Ford Foundation to the Prior Reference Category is hardly a punishment. It must be added that the Ford Foundation has over the decades assisted several socially worthwhile projects, including several schemes under the Green Revolution of the 1960s, although in recent years it has focused less on such nation-building projects than on others which are societally interventionist on the model followed in Venezuela, Egypt and elsewhere.



Those close to Ford are in full battle cry, accusing the BJP government of "harassment of civil society" through a "crackdown" on NGOs. Lack of a structured communications strategy by Team Modi has thus far obscured the fact that only 16 of more than 35,000 FCRA (Foreign Contributions Regulation Act)-registered NGOs having around 3,000 foreign donors are in the Prior Reference Category (PRC). The impression sought to be created is that instead of acting in the matter of just 0.5% of the 3,000 foreign NGOs operating in India, the PRC condition has been imposed on an overwhelming number of such entities. Greenpeace is another agency that had escaped serious governmental scrutiny during the Manmohan Singh decade, but which has now been held to account for seeking to fund activities designed to block production of essential minerals in India in order to promote their import from Canada and Australia. These countries, whose nationals are active in the higher reaches of Greenpeace, are earning billions of dollars each year from exporting minerals such as iron ore, coal and now uranium to India, minerals that are in plentiful supply in this country, but which NGOs and their UPA allies had thus far prevented from getting extracted, and who are on track to earn much more in a context where China is cutting back on its purchases.



A prominent donee of the Ford Foundation has been Delhi Chief Minister Arvind Kejriwal, who got a monthly scholarship of Rs 30,000 during 2004-7 from the US-based Ashoka Foundation, and who was given the Magsaysay Award, which is directly funded by the Rockefeller and Ford Foundations. Kejriwal had also received $400,000 in 2006 and again in 2009, while references to a third grant of $200,000 in 2011 seem to have been removed from the Foundation's website, perhaps owing to the possibility that it may have gotten linked to the street protests organised during that period on the lines of those in Egypt, Tunisia and other countries (which too received substantial funding from US-based entities that had close links with then Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton). Interestingly, several politicians in India drawn from across the political spectrum have ties to such organisations, which is why it would be inaccurate to single out Arvind Kejriwal in this context.



[Indians who think they're so clever in their 'independent thought' to vote for the AAP are actually merely manipulated into doing so and are considered useful idiots by the US govt/Ford Foundation, and are voting in the Ford Foundation's agenda.

BTW, US and its FF proves that AAP-voters are - far from being remotely intelligent - the most manipulable minds in India. Of course christoislamics and seculars are always mentally manipulable - it's why they're in christoislamicommunism and de-heathenised in the first place.

But India's christos - told by their churches to vote for AAP - and muslims like that muslimah who told her ummah to vote for AAP because she knows it's their/islam's party, and India's communists too, specifically know that AAP is the local puppet of the ventriloquist US. Christoislamicommunists were *conscious* of the fact that AAP is a front for FF/US, and followed FF/US bidding consciously.

It is specifically India's progressives/pseculars who vote AAP that are the ignorant morons - like that AAP canvasing agent - who are mentally manipulated into voting AAP, i.e. without knowing that it is a local front set up by and for US interests.

Should let the impending islamic jihad genocide AAP voters, which is what they've voted for. US/FF won't care. And neither will Hindoos.]



Interestingly, the Ford Foundation now appears to have tasked a former employee, Amitabh Behar, to create a network of NGOs across India under the "Wada Na Todo" (Don't Break Promises) slogan. Behar has taken over the well-regarded National Foundation of India (NFI), and according to sources in Delhi, has received over $7 million from Ford, besides significant amounts from the MacArthur and Rockefeller Foundations for expanding his activities into directions that appear to veer into the political, exactly as they did in the case of some other donees of the Ford Foundation, especially in Gujarat, a state which seems to have been on the radar of several organisations during 2002-2013. Such a network would have the capability to launch within weeks "independent and spontaneous" agitations on the lines desired by donor agencies, and can therefore get used whenever there is a disconnect between the wishes of the governments backing such foreign NGOs and the Government of India. Extensive networking in media and even within government has added to the power of these agencies to channel public opinion in ways seen by their principals as beneficial to their interests.



Over the past decade, assisted by friends in politics and in the administration, identity issues have been the predominant concern of such foundations, which have collectively lavished funds on projects designed to separate into mutually exclusive compartments, religious and social groups in India. They have focused on projects involving race issues, religion and the alleged discriminatory treatment of particular sections, encouraging its donees to separate different segments of society from each other and to create a sense of victimhood in them. Had David Cameron been the Prime Minister of India, he would have received a rebuke from the Department of State (not to mention the United States Commission on International Religious Freedom, that is USCIRF) for saying that his country was "Christian", or Barack Obama for the frequency with which he turns to the Bible in public, a freedom regarded as regressive in the case of Narendra Modi talking about the Bhagavad Gita, despite the fact that the Gita is, in the view of many, a classic of ancient India even as it is regarded by many as a religious text.



Given the small number of funding organisations affected by the PRC, and the fact that the Modi government is in no mood to back down in the face of pressure from within the country and outside, it would appear that Ford and other foundations may need to tread more carefully in domestic politics than has been the case thus far. "A small group of interested individuals ought not to hold India-US relations to ransom by demanding immunity", a senior official said, adding that "there needs to be mutual respect for policy autonomy in each country and this is missing when even routine bureaucratic decisions get impugned in such a sharp way". He ended by pointing out that "India will have a lot to say in future about such (US administration) inanities and insanities as the slapping of Super 301 or the USCIRF report under the pressure of big donors to political campaigns".

3. News that's some months older:



timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Wonder-how-long-India-will-remain-a-secular-country-SC/articleshow/46179587.cms

Wonder how long India will remain a secular country: SC

Amit Choudhary,TNN | Feb 10, 2015, 12.08 AM IST



Supreme Court on Monday expressed concern over growing influence of religion on social issues.



NEW DELHI: Expressing concern over growing influence of religion on social issues, the Supreme Court on Monday wondered how long India would remain a secular country but batted for a uniform civil code.



"It is a secular country but I don't know how long it will remain so," Justice Vikramjit Sen said during the hearing on a PIL seeking recognition for Christian courts set up under its personal law.

(^ Landmark statement: Indian secular courts - despite successfully foisting christianism's secularism on Hindoos in once-Hindoo India - admit defeat in the face of christoislamania. Christoislamania is no fool and has no intention of being straightjacketed by secularism, since it intended secularism only to incapacitate Hindoos with.)



Justice Sen said law should not be compelled to recognize dictates of personal law in civil and family matters like divorce, marriage and adoption.



The bench, also including Justice C Nagappan, however, said courts should not go into the area as every religion then would say that the law should incorporate their personal law. "We have to stamp religion out of civil matters," it said.



It, however, granted four weeks time to the Centre to file a reply on the petition which said 'Canon Law' was the personal law of Indian Christians and that a decree of dissolution of marriage granted by an ecclesiastical court should be held valid and binding.



The petitioner, Clarence Pais, a former president of the Catholic Association of Dakshina Kannada in Karnataka, said many Catholics, who married after getting divorce from Christian courts, faced criminal charges of bigamy as such divorces were not recognized by the courts. He said 'Canon Law' had to be applied and enforced by a criminal court while deciding a case under Section 494 (bigamy) of the IPC.



"It is reasonable that when the courts in India recognize dissolution of marriage (by pronouncing the word talaq three times) under Mohammedan law which is the personal law of Muslims, the courts should also recognize for the purpose of dissolution of marriage Canon Law as the personal law of Indian Catholics," the petition said.



Canon Law says that Catholics are required to marry in a Catholic church and enjoins that they seek nullity of marriage in the canonical court also under the code of canon law. Otherwise, the marriage and the dissolution are not recognized by the Catholic church.



"If criminal courts, while considering prosecution under Section 494 IPC, reject the application of Canon Law as the personal law of Catholics, a very serious result will follow and hundreds of spouses under the second marriage will have to face prosecution, jail and fine," the petitioner said.

So happy that secularism in India - and its carriers, seculars - too will be brutally genocided by the impending jihad. More just desserts.





4. Dharma Sansad (including Swami Swaroopananda) state they will build Rama temple in Ayodhya in spite of the apathetic and cowardly govt which likes to go back on its word to Hindus and Hindus alone. Dharma Sansad has even told NDA govt to stop speaking of Rama temple altogether. (Should have asked them to stop speaking of or thinking of Sri Rama himself. He's wasted on them - and on other traitors.)





indiatoday.intoday.in/story/ram-temple-ayodhya-shankaracharya-dwarkapeeth-swaroopananda-saraswati-rajnath-singh-supreme-court/1/437696.html

Will build Ram temple in Ayodhya without political help: Shankaracharya

IndiaToday.in New Delhi, May 13, 2015 | UPDATED 08:08 IST



Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati, the Shankaracharya of Dwarkapeeth. (Photo: jagadgurushankaracharya.org)Swami Swaroopanand Saraswati, the Shankaracharya of Dwarkapeeth. (Photo: jagadgurushankaracharya.org)



Hindu religious leaders on Tuesday said they will construct Ram temple in Ayodhya without any political help if the Supreme Court order is in their favour.



The statement comes after Home Minister Rajnath Singh stated that the NDA government cannot bring law on Ram temple without majority in Rajya Sabha.

(Translation: it will never happen if it were up to the "Hindu nationalist" govt, despite Hindoos having won the right in court.)



Addressing the Hindu Dharma Sansad at Ramlila Maidan, Shankaracharya of Dwarkapeeth Swaroopananda Saraswati asked BJP leaders to stop talking about construction of Ram temple, PTI reported.



Shankaracharya alleged that a section of political class brought in the name of Mughal emperor Babar to gain "political advantage" and said that the court has accepted the fact that Babar had never been to the place. There were remains that proved that it was a place of worship of Hindus, he claimed.



"It is Ram janmbhoomi and if the Supreme Court gives its verdict soon... because they have agreed it is Ram Janmabhoomi, but some portion has been given to Muslims while their plea has been rejected... If that is decided, then we will... without any political party... the saints, great souls, gentlemen will construct Ram temple at the spot of Lord's birth.



"And by God's grace, we won't need their (politicians) money, people will give us. We will construct temple, you please forgive us. Leave the discussion now," he added.



(And so the temple will be built as per views of Dharma Sansad, i.e. Hindoo=heathen views onlee. Not by unheathens who also make use of the Hindu label.

And another good thing is that, since the impotent govt wouldn't have any involvement in the temple's construction - the Hindoos having told the "Hindu nationalists" party to stay away from the matter - the Indian govt can't at least use government involvement in the construction process as an excuse to take over the temple at a future date. They're always looking for an excuse.)



The Sansad also passed a resolution in this regard.



Amongst other resolutions adopted by the Sansad are for ban on cow slaughter, imparting knowledge of 'Ramayana' and 'Mahabharata' to youngsters at educational institutes, and for imposing ban on alcohol.



(As long as they won't turn the itihaasas into "all-Indian"/secular "literature" like so many moderns do, I'm all for it.

Then again, it's the Dharma Sansad passing the resolution. <- It will be a dark day indeed when they start declaring that the itihaasas are anything other than Hindoo=heathen literature and sacred from the ground up.)



Hindu Dharma Sansad is a gathering of various Hindu religious bodies and oraganisations.



The Sansad also sought to provide relief and help in restoring temples in Nepal which were destroyed in the earthquake.



Shankarcharya also said the political class lacked knowledge of Hindu religion.



Referring to Prime Minister Narendra Modi gifting 'Bhagvad Gita' to Japanese emperor Akihito during his visit to the east Asian country in September last year, Shankaracharya quipped that he should rather ensure children across India are taught lessons from the book.



(Yeah well, Modi's "Hindoo activism" seems to be just for canvassing. He seems fine to let Hindoo heathenism - and Hindoos - extinct by christoislamic genocide, even while getting snapshots taken of himself participating in Hindu events. Modi seems to exemplify the new "Hindu nationalism"=secularism, despite secularism being a poison to all heathenisms and promoter of christoislamania. Still nothing to make him seem different from Licinius.

Time was when heathen rulers ruled the heathen nation by their heathenism. Modi seems to have laid the groundwork for what future "Hindu nationalist" leaders will be like/what can be expected from them: that they may not exceed the secular mandate in their rule, even though christoislamic rule does all the time (e.g. Mizoram, Kashmir, even W Bengal, Kerala and UP nowadays).

In contrast to "Hindu nationalist" political inclinations to secularism, wherever missionary religions - be these the Indic ones or christoislam - came to power in the once-Hindoo subcontinent and SE Asia, they regularly promoted their own religion, at the direct expense and often even by persecution of Hindoo heathenism. Only modern Hindus - Hindutva followers - insist that a so-called Hindu govt must be secular, i.e. not a Hindu govt in any way other than in name [sort of like The Chindu newspaper, although that is moreover cryptocatholic]. And then their supporters even bleat that all this is a great achievement for Hindus. For secularism yes, not at all for Hindoos. BJP has done Nothing for Hindoos yet and is unlikely to hereafter as well.

Don't know why BJP don't just call themselves a secular nationalist party. And tomorrow they can drop "nationalist" too, like KKKangress did in time, and thereafter become cryptochristo, also like KKKangress did, then the transformation will be complete.)



Amongst other demands, the gurus demanded introduction of uniform civil code and abolishing article 370 of the Constitution which gives special status to Jammu and Kashmir.

The great tragedy is that Hindoos really must keep voting for BJP. Because BJP is [for now, still] in some ways better than KKKangress. So until BJP's inevitable transformation from a secular nationalist party to being hijacked into a cryptochristian party, as has already happened in Goa**, BJP remains Hindus' only=best choice. But Hindus need not delude themselves that BJP is anything more than a secular party which may promise Hindoos the moon and deliver nothing and may at times opportunistically grant them small concessions in return for votes. BJP knows it can afford to be haughty to their Hindoo votebank and Hindoos' interests/heathendom, since BJP knows Hindoos really have no other alternative. So the Hindoo vote for BJP in 2019 is assured. It is the christoislamaniac vote that BJP is after, and which may not come their way unless BJP sucks up to the minorities. And BJP will compromise to their minority votebank by promising grandly and delivering, as in Goa** (whereas BJP doesn't deliver on promises made to Hindoos, again because Hindoos have no other alternatives and BJP is keenly aware of this. So it thinks nothing of broken promises where Hindoos are concerned).



[** In Goa, BJP is already a christian party: Hindu-named crypto christo BJP members didn't just promise to ban Ghar Wapasi if it ever comes to Goa - which is a promise that pleases only the minority christians of that state, i.e. BJP caves to its christian voters' wishes - but the same catholic-infested BJP has threatened "to make LGBTs 'normal' with medicines", which is a christian preoccupation and is yet more legislation to satisfy solely the catholics/christians of Goa, and is not anything Hindus sought, as Hindus have no interest in interfering in others' lives.]



But since Swami Swaroopananda along with the rest of the Dharma Sansad have issued such drastic statements about Ayodhya as seen above, indicating their total distrust in the NDA/BJP govt ever rebuilding the Ayodhya temple*, I predict that Sandhya Jain of Vijayvaani (who wrote that the Swami should "release the mathams from his evil influence") and her article writers/sycophants M Pramod Kumar (who wrote the article "Swami Swarupanand is an embarrassment to acharya parampara") and Vijaya Rajeeva (who declared her suspicion that the Swami can't be genuine for reasons like not accepting/rolling over to Shirdi Sai Sufism) and VV's countless acquiescent idiot 'Hindu'/newageist readers, will all be at it again: penning frantic articles spewing the usual hate on the Swami, declaring his statements are anti-Modi/anti-BJP and must be motivated by KKKangressi-ness etc etc. All while conveniently ignoring - again - that the Dharma Sansad has altogether declared the same, and that nothing he/they said is wrong. It is a fact that the Modi govt has done zip all for Hindoo heathenism, and that they're just excuse mongering: finding one excuse after another for not doing what Hindoos already have a valid and lawful right to.



But since Swami Swaroopananda is not alone in his statements but is echoed fully by the Dharma Sansad, perhaps Sandhya Jain will now lecture that the Swami must have an 'evil' influence on all the Dharma Sansad and not just the mathas (as she'd claimed before)? To keep her arguments consistent, I mean. And I'm sure more idiot 'Hindus'/new-ageists will believe that. They're a dime a dozen after all in this era.



* BJP govt won't ever rebuild it. Certainly they won't ever choose to even be seen to bother (unless their vote share is threatened, then they may go as far as issuing pacifying platitudes or once more making promises they don't intend to keep). Fortunately Dharma Sansad might rebuild the temple one day, at least they would certainly try: it's not off their agenda since the DS is HindOO. I'm glad the DS has given hope to Hindoos dreaming of a rebuilt Mandir to their Sri Rama at Ayodhya. Not sure if it will ever come to anything - more likely that Hindoos will get massacred again and the reconstruction of the Kovil will be prevented again (isn't that how things always go in modern christoislamicly-paralysed India under the gangrene curse?) But the point is that the DS still considers it a prime objective and wants to pursue it for all the right reasons, a.o.t. unheathen Hindutva's Replacement Theology reasons of "symbolism" etc.





The important part of this post are the 4 news items archived in the quote blocks minus the comments in purple.