Where: Bihar. Muzaffarpur.
When: For about a week terminating with a riot on 18 Jan.
- Hindu boy who was friendly with muslim girl was missing for 1 week, found murdered near home of the islamic father of the girl, who is one of the islamics accused in the case of the abduction and murder of Hindu boy.
- police are still after the other islamaniacs suspected of murdering the Hindu boy
- Hindoos take revenge at last, burn accused villains' homes.
- 3 burnt to death bodies charred beyond all recognition, not yet identified. Mishra of the police said they were muslims.
- One further person found dead from bullet wounds, in a field.
- 400 policemen posted
- 14 Hindus arrested for avenging Hindu boy. Stood up for their survival, like Yezidis against the jihadi ISIS.
Note: International news (AP/ABC) says that it was merely Hindus' suspicion that the obviously spontaneously-dead Hindu boy had been murdered by islamaniacs. I.e. "muslims innocent, Hindoos guilty of leaping to murderous conclusions." ABC conveniently concealed the news about how the islamic Vikki is indeed one of the accused in the abduction and murder of the boy in a police case - and that the police arrested him for this - and that the police are after the other islamics involved in the murder.
ABC's deliberate one-sided reporting here is identical to how, during similar recent reprisals by Burmese Buddhists after islamaniacs had gangraped a Buddhist woman, the anti-Burmese-Buddhism AmeriKKKan news had declared that Buddhists merely *suspected* the "innocent" islamaniacs of raping the girl. In fact, AmeriKKKan news went all the way to declare that Burmese Buddhists had this evil tendency to paint islamaniacs as sexual predators of Buddhist Burmese women. (Never mind that this is not a stereotype but a fact based on the experience of Burmese Buddhists, Bangladeshi Buddhists, Pakistan's Hindus, India's Hindus and of course, the Yezidis.) However, the AmeriKKKan intentional misreporting got exposed when Australian news admitted that Burmese police themselves had stated that rape charges were indeed pending against the very islamaniacs that the Buddhists had accused and retaliated against. According to AmeriKKKan christomedia, the rape was only "allegedly" committed by the 2 islamaniacs, and the "evil" Buddhists were blinded by angry suspicions against the islamaniacs. Islamaniacs - besides having gangraped - murdered a Buddhist, and it was only then that Buddhists killed an islamaniac. Burmese Buddhists realised that compassion can't be replaced with infinite tolerance for murderous gangraping intolerance=cchristoislam. Anyway, that was just another case showing how christo AmeriKKKa is always firmly on the side of their brothers in monotheism - i.e. islam - where any strife involves unsaved kaffirs.
1. firstpost.com/india/14-arrested-after-3-burnt-alive-as-mob-torches-houses-in-bihars-muzaffarpur-2052383.html
Also interesting is that Firstpost named the two communities. Compare to news in the previous post from Jan 15 in Gujarat, where the "two communities" were not named but anyone can tell who they are from the descriptions given.
2. abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/burned-death-hindu-muslim-clash-india-28310406
Can see how there is conveniently absolutely NO mention of the police going after the islamics accused of murdering the Hindu boy, and which murder was the entire reason for the Hindu reprisals. And no mention of the police having already arrested the muslimah's father for the crime.
The only reference is a soundbyte from the police - carefully edited out from among more crucial statements - about how the Hindus merely suspected the islamaniacs of murdering the boy. In essence, by carefully excising all mention of how the police are pursuing islamaniacs over the Hindu boy's abduction and murder, international christomedia has edited the news for international consumption such that it seems that Hindu suspicions - as in the Buddhist Burmese case - came out of the blue and that "evil Hindus" were therefore merely stereotyping and then persecuting the "poor innocent muslims".
Of course, the news of how islamaniacs terrorised Hindus and attacked religious places during Makara Sankranti celebrations in Gujarat on Jan 15, where 3 people were murdered, conveniently goes unreported in international news. More proof that only Hindoos were murdered there, since if it were muslims, Indian christomedia would have blared so through all loudspeakers - doubly so because Gujarat is Modi's homeground - and the events would have made the international news and be transform into a "genocide" .
3. Oh, the number of fatalities have gone up to 4. AP/ABC is convinced they are all muslim, though the 4th interestingly died from gunshots. If true, the Yezidis won't be missing them, I think.
Interesting how it is imperative to ABC news that everybody know that allegedly 4 muslims were killed, as seen in their very emphathic title. If 4 Hindus had been murdered, the title would read: "4 dead/spontaneously-combusted in Hindu-muslim clash", that's if they bothered to report it all then, which they usually don't when Hindus are the sole or significant casualties. (Did the Muzaffarnagar massacre of Hindus even make international headlines? IIRC not.) As it stands, the Hindoo boy who was murdered is tellingly not included in the fatality count in the headline. Which shows the priorities/sympathies as well as the motives of press report.
abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/burned-death-hindu-muslim-clash-india-28312451
Again, conveniently leaves unmentioned how islamics are indeed accused in the murder of the Hindu boy and how the police have apprehended one of the accused islamics and are still after the rest of them.
But the omission points to deliberation on AP's part: they want to present indian islamics as totally innocent and persecuted "out of the blue".
Anyway, Obama will no doubt bring this up and lecture Hindus.
Modi should tell Obama - and make sure the statement comes out in ALL media - about the 3 that died in Gujarat because islamaniacs rioted *again* to curtail a Hindu festival.
Then Modi should request Obama on record, on camera - get it in all print - to please stop funding christian terror in North East India, and give Obama the figures of the Hindoo Vanavasi refugees like Bru and Rheang who are living in fear out of their homegrounds all because christians tried to convert-or-kill them. Modi should ask Obama in a live interview to please please Please Stop the "faith incentives" and USAID and World Vision which keep funding christian terrorism, killing swamis regularly. And Modi must publicly tell Obama that it is Not Okay to do this to Hindus. And that, compared to 3 or possibly 4 muslims that died in Bihar - but in retaliation for the 1 Hindu that members of their islamic community had killed: police admit that much - the numbers of Hindoos who have been genocided and ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homeland in India's NE in just the last few decades (just so that the christians of the North-Eastern states can suddenly declare these pure "christian states" and "kingdom of christ in Nagaland") is much much higher and runs in a great many tens of thousands. Modi MUST request that Obama dedicate some words, or a whole interview, on the subject to give his opinion on this matter and where religious freedom of alien christianism ends and the religious rights of the native polytheistic idolatrous heathens of the subcontinent begins.
Modi should also ask Obama to tell Google to tell its Indian branch to stop funding ActionAid which monies go both to "the church" - here, Modi must say "AKA funding armed terrorism in the christianising NE" - AND to ANHAD which has ties to groups involved in jihadi activities.
Actually, grilling Obama on this subject -though necessary- is less meaningful than dragging the Clintons and Bush-es over the coals for it. Obama's obviously a closet agnostic/atheist (he's pro-gay marriage, and IIRC pro-abortion, both of which makes him totally un christoislamic). Don't know why ignoramuses keep accusing him of being a christoislamic.
Corrected: Firstpost does have Mishra identifying the "community" of the 3 dead. Wonder why they're not spinning tales of spontaneous combustion for islamics too as they do for Hindus who die from islamic fires?
When: For about a week terminating with a riot on 18 Jan.
- Hindu boy who was friendly with muslim girl was missing for 1 week, found murdered near home of the islamic father of the girl, who is one of the islamics accused in the case of the abduction and murder of Hindu boy.
- police are still after the other islamaniacs suspected of murdering the Hindu boy
- Hindoos take revenge at last, burn accused villains' homes.
- 3 burnt to death bodies charred beyond all recognition, not yet identified. Mishra of the police said they were muslims.
- One further person found dead from bullet wounds, in a field.
- 400 policemen posted
- 14 Hindus arrested for avenging Hindu boy. Stood up for their survival, like Yezidis against the jihadi ISIS.
Note: International news (AP/ABC) says that it was merely Hindus' suspicion that the obviously spontaneously-dead Hindu boy had been murdered by islamaniacs. I.e. "muslims innocent, Hindoos guilty of leaping to murderous conclusions." ABC conveniently concealed the news about how the islamic Vikki is indeed one of the accused in the abduction and murder of the boy in a police case - and that the police arrested him for this - and that the police are after the other islamics involved in the murder.
ABC's deliberate one-sided reporting here is identical to how, during similar recent reprisals by Burmese Buddhists after islamaniacs had gangraped a Buddhist woman, the anti-Burmese-Buddhism AmeriKKKan news had declared that Buddhists merely *suspected* the "innocent" islamaniacs of raping the girl. In fact, AmeriKKKan news went all the way to declare that Burmese Buddhists had this evil tendency to paint islamaniacs as sexual predators of Buddhist Burmese women. (Never mind that this is not a stereotype but a fact based on the experience of Burmese Buddhists, Bangladeshi Buddhists, Pakistan's Hindus, India's Hindus and of course, the Yezidis.) However, the AmeriKKKan intentional misreporting got exposed when Australian news admitted that Burmese police themselves had stated that rape charges were indeed pending against the very islamaniacs that the Buddhists had accused and retaliated against. According to AmeriKKKan christomedia, the rape was only "allegedly" committed by the 2 islamaniacs, and the "evil" Buddhists were blinded by angry suspicions against the islamaniacs. Islamaniacs - besides having gangraped - murdered a Buddhist, and it was only then that Buddhists killed an islamaniac. Burmese Buddhists realised that compassion can't be replaced with infinite tolerance for murderous gangraping intolerance=cchristoislam. Anyway, that was just another case showing how christo AmeriKKKa is always firmly on the side of their brothers in monotheism - i.e. islam - where any strife involves unsaved kaffirs.
1. firstpost.com/india/14-arrested-after-3-burnt-alive-as-mob-torches-houses-in-bihars-muzaffarpur-2052383.html
Quote:14 arrested after 3 burnt alive as mob torches houses in Bihar's Muzaffarpur
Jan 19, 2015 15:18 IST
#bIhar #Clash #communal riot #Muzaffarpur #NewsTracker #Riot #youth
44 Comments
Three persons were charred to death as a mob on Sunday torched nine houses in a village in Bihar's Muzaffarpur district following the recovery of an abducted youth's body. According to reports, 14 people have been arrested in connection with the attack.
Hundreds of policemen have been posted in the village.
The body of 19-year-old Bhartendu Kumar was found near the house of Vikki, who is the main accused in the abduction and murder case, in Ajitpur village early this morning, a police officer said.
As soon as the news spread, a mob gathered near Vikki's residence and torched it along with eight other houses, Senior Superintendent of Police (SSP) Ranjeet Kumar Mishra told PTI over the phone.
The bodies were yet to be identified as all three were charred beyond recognition, he said.
Atul Prasad, a Bihar state administrator, said the violence erupted after the body of a young Hindu boy was found in Sarayian village more than a week after he went missing.
Representational image: PTI
Prasad said Hindu fishermen blamed Muslims for killing the boy who was friendly with a Muslim girl from the village, 105 kilometers (65 miles) north of Patna, the capital of Bihar state.
The charred bodies of three Muslims were found in the burned huts in the poor community, he said.
(Why "poor"? Are they poorer than the Hindu fishermen?)
Police arrested eight Hindu men, and Prasad said the situation remains tense but under control in the village.
Vikki's father, who is a co-accused, has been arrested on the charges of kidnapping and murder of the 19 year-old youth, Mishra said, adding, raids were on to nab the other accused in the case and also those involved in arson.
As many as 400 policemen, including 40 police officers, were camping in the village to monitor the law and order situation which was tense, but under control, the SSP said. Kumar had gone missing from the village on January 9. Vikki was named as an accused by the abducted youth's father, he said.
PTI with AP inputs
Also interesting is that Firstpost named the two communities. Compare to news in the previous post from Jan 15 in Gujarat, where the "two communities" were not named but anyone can tell who they are from the descriptions given.
2. abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/burned-death-hindu-muslim-clash-india-28310406
Quote:3 Burned to Death in Hindu-Muslim Clash in India
PATNA, India Jan 18, 2015, 3:22 PM ET
By INDRAJIT SINGH Associated Press
Associated Press
At least three Muslims were burned to death Sunday when their thatched huts were set on fire during a clash between Hindu and Muslim groups in a village in eastern India, a government official said.
Atul Prasad, a Bihar state administrator, said the violence erupted after the body of a young Hindu boy was found on a farm in Sarayian village more than a week after he went missing.
Prasad said the Hindu fishermen community blamed Muslims for killing the boy who was friendly with a Muslim girl from the village, nearly 105 kilometers (65 miles) north of Patna, the capital of Bihar state.
The charred bodies of three Muslims were found in huts set on fire, he said.
Police have arrested eight Hindu villagers for burning nearly two dozen huts in the poor Muslim community.
Prasad said the situation remains tense but under control in the village.
Hindus comprise more than 80 percent and Muslims nearly 13 percent of India's 1.2 billion people. They largely live together peacefully in various parts of the country, but there are occasional incidents of violence.
Can see how there is conveniently absolutely NO mention of the police going after the islamics accused of murdering the Hindu boy, and which murder was the entire reason for the Hindu reprisals. And no mention of the police having already arrested the muslimah's father for the crime.
The only reference is a soundbyte from the police - carefully edited out from among more crucial statements - about how the Hindus merely suspected the islamaniacs of murdering the boy. In essence, by carefully excising all mention of how the police are pursuing islamaniacs over the Hindu boy's abduction and murder, international christomedia has edited the news for international consumption such that it seems that Hindu suspicions - as in the Buddhist Burmese case - came out of the blue and that "evil Hindus" were therefore merely stereotyping and then persecuting the "poor innocent muslims".
Of course, the news of how islamaniacs terrorised Hindus and attacked religious places during Makara Sankranti celebrations in Gujarat on Jan 15, where 3 people were murdered, conveniently goes unreported in international news. More proof that only Hindoos were murdered there, since if it were muslims, Indian christomedia would have blared so through all loudspeakers - doubly so because Gujarat is Modi's homeground - and the events would have made the international news and be transform into a "genocide" .
3. Oh, the number of fatalities have gone up to 4. AP/ABC is convinced they are all muslim, though the 4th interestingly died from gunshots. If true, the Yezidis won't be missing them, I think.
Interesting how it is imperative to ABC news that everybody know that allegedly 4 muslims were killed, as seen in their very emphathic title. If 4 Hindus had been murdered, the title would read: "4 dead/spontaneously-combusted in Hindu-muslim clash", that's if they bothered to report it all then, which they usually don't when Hindus are the sole or significant casualties. (Did the Muzaffarnagar massacre of Hindus even make international headlines? IIRC not.) As it stands, the Hindoo boy who was murdered is tellingly not included in the fatality count in the headline. Which shows the priorities/sympathies as well as the motives of press report.
abcnews.go.com/International/wireStory/burned-death-hindu-muslim-clash-india-28312451
Quote:4 Muslims Killed in Hindu-Muslim Clash in Northern India
PATNA, India Jan 19, 2015, 5:35 AM ET
Associated Press
At least four Muslim villagers were killed, three of them burned to death, when their thatched huts were set on fire during a clash between Hindu and Muslim groups in eastern India, a government official said.
Police had arrested 14 people Monday on charges of arson and murder, said Ranjit K. Mishra, a local superintendent of police.
Security has been tightened in and around Sarayian village in Bihar state with some 500 police officers assigned to the area.
Atul Prasad, a Bihar state administrator, said the violence erupted Sunday after the body of a young Hindu boy was found in Sarayian more than a week after he went missing.
Prasad said Hindu fishermen blamed Muslims for killing the boy who was friendly with a Muslim girl from the village, 105 kilometers (65 miles) north of Patna, the capital of Bihar.
The charred bodies of three Muslims were found in the burned huts in the poor community, he said. The bullet-riddled body of a fourth man was found in a field in the village, Mishra said.
(Religion of 4th man not actually mentioned by Mishra.
So unless shot by the police, the 4th man would be a Hindu, because islamics like christian terrorists have guns in India - seen in several previous riots such as Muzaffarnagar, where Indian police were shot at by well-armed islamic *snipers* and even the islamics admitted that the jihadi outfit Lashkar-e-Toiba had come to recruit them. In contrast, India's Hindus don't have guns and only die by them.)
Prasad said the situation remains tense but under control in the village.
Hindus make up more than 80 percent and Muslims nearly 13 percent of India's 1.2 billion people. They largely live peacefully in various parts of the country, but there is occasional violence.
Last year, around 50 people died in clashes between Hindus and Muslim in Muzaffarnagar town in neighboring Uttar Pradesh state.
Again, conveniently leaves unmentioned how islamics are indeed accused in the murder of the Hindu boy and how the police have apprehended one of the accused islamics and are still after the rest of them.
But the omission points to deliberation on AP's part: they want to present indian islamics as totally innocent and persecuted "out of the blue".
Quote:Tom 25 minutes ago
Pointless fighting over pointless primitive superstitions.
(It only takes one primitive superstition to generate violence where christoislamania/missionary religions are involved. And so exactly the same would have happened had all the Hindus - including the Hindu boy - been atheists instead, in an atheist-majority India with the same Indian and international christomedia colluding with islam to convert the nation to monotheism. Islam doesn't get along with atheists either, ya see. The many Toms need not wonder long in disbelief, and can see it in action for themselves in time, as islam is growing in the west too: coming soon to their own neighbourhood. Eurabia and United States of Islam etc.)
Reply
Share
Fawad Mumtaz 9 hours ago
hope they had the right to live
Reply
Share
IAF101 > Fawad Mumtaz 4 hours ago
I wonder whether the Hindu boy found murdered in their village enjoyed the same right first ?
4
Reply
Share
kartashok 18 minutes ago
Muslim animals think they can go along killing us Hindus whenever they feel like it, but they cry foul when we fight back! Then India's treacherous liberal, pseudo-secular (in reality anti-Hindu) media only reports the sufferings of "innocent" Muslims and the Whites back the Muslims because their own liberal media endorsed by Al Barak Hussein Obama loves the Muslims!
Reply
Share
Tom > kartashok 14 minutes ago
Sure, the media is biased towards muslims. LOL
Reply
Share
Scottie M. 8 hours ago
Expect more of this to continue under the regime of far-right Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi.
Reply
Share
Sanjeev > Scottie M. 8 hours ago
Nope. This incident happened in a state ruled by the opposition and not BJP(Modi's party).
13
Reply
(Oh well, too bad for "Scottie". But nice try. Scottie's a christian without a doubt. Because no western atheist cares about whether Modi is allegedly "far right", let alone Hindu or christo or islamic. Or nationalist. At worst, atheists respond like Tom further above - i.e. "all religions are equally bad" - and at best respond with how "islam has bloody borders" like Dawkins etc did, or will parrot the death-count from jihad "see thereligionofpeace.com".
That is, either atheists are ignorant about all other religions, or they know all about islam. And often about christoislam's dealings in Africa and India too.
But casually commenting western atheists - not working for the US govt's psyops orgs and chairs - would *never*, *never* be referring to India as having a Hindu nationalist party - or use the tell-tale christo lingo of equating this to "far-right" - let alone pronounce that this is to blame for the latest riot. That's a peculiarly western christian trait or an Indian christo(communist) trait. Most Americans atheists wouldn't even care to *know* that the party is called BJP, that it is Hindu nationalist and led by Modi. (Like they care.) And those that do bother to know, would then certainly also have acquainted themselves with how christianism and islam are terrorising India too. See internet infidels's "Their Other Dirty Linen" article where American atheists write about how christianism has been terrorising Hindus in India.)
Share
Avatar
IAF101 > Scottie M. 4 hours ago
Why is it that Western audiences like to believe India to be this "mono-state" of one government, one ruler and one center of power ?
And how come the shooting of black teenagers in Fuergeson or New York or Florida is not reflective on Barack Obama's "Regime" yet India's PM who run an LARGER democracy, with far more diversity, political participants and ethnic diversity is responsible ??
7
Reply
Share
kartashok > Scottie M. 23 minutes ago
You don't know anything about India, you dumb white idiot! Stay out of our affairs!
1
Reply
Share
Anyway, Obama will no doubt bring this up and lecture Hindus.
Modi should tell Obama - and make sure the statement comes out in ALL media - about the 3 that died in Gujarat because islamaniacs rioted *again* to curtail a Hindu festival.
Then Modi should request Obama on record, on camera - get it in all print - to please stop funding christian terror in North East India, and give Obama the figures of the Hindoo Vanavasi refugees like Bru and Rheang who are living in fear out of their homegrounds all because christians tried to convert-or-kill them. Modi should ask Obama in a live interview to please please Please Stop the "faith incentives" and USAID and World Vision which keep funding christian terrorism, killing swamis regularly. And Modi must publicly tell Obama that it is Not Okay to do this to Hindus. And that, compared to 3 or possibly 4 muslims that died in Bihar - but in retaliation for the 1 Hindu that members of their islamic community had killed: police admit that much - the numbers of Hindoos who have been genocided and ethnically cleansed from their ancestral homeland in India's NE in just the last few decades (just so that the christians of the North-Eastern states can suddenly declare these pure "christian states" and "kingdom of christ in Nagaland") is much much higher and runs in a great many tens of thousands. Modi MUST request that Obama dedicate some words, or a whole interview, on the subject to give his opinion on this matter and where religious freedom of alien christianism ends and the religious rights of the native polytheistic idolatrous heathens of the subcontinent begins.
Modi should also ask Obama to tell Google to tell its Indian branch to stop funding ActionAid which monies go both to "the church" - here, Modi must say "AKA funding armed terrorism in the christianising NE" - AND to ANHAD which has ties to groups involved in jihadi activities.
Actually, grilling Obama on this subject -though necessary- is less meaningful than dragging the Clintons and Bush-es over the coals for it. Obama's obviously a closet agnostic/atheist (he's pro-gay marriage, and IIRC pro-abortion, both of which makes him totally un christoislamic). Don't know why ignoramuses keep accusing him of being a christoislamic.
Corrected: Firstpost does have Mishra identifying the "community" of the 3 dead. Wonder why they're not spinning tales of spontaneous combustion for islamics too as they do for Hindus who die from islamic fires?