Related to post 116 of the Crypto-christianism targets Hindu Temples thread and posts 81 and 82 further above in this thread. (That first post has examples showing how islamaniacs retaining echoes of their heathen ancestors' kine traditions did not invite christians to invade under the garb of "animal rights activism" despite the participants biting the tail of bulls during "mud cow racing". Instead, islamaniacs carrying out such pre-islamic traditions are showcased by the media as "culture" and in very positive terms.)
* vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3457
Jallikattu: Suffocation by Law
by Balakumar Somu on 12 Jan 2015
* vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3456
Jallikattu ban could lead to mass slaughter of bulls
by Senthil on 11 Jan 2015
* realitycheck.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/the-jallikattu-ban-is-a-tragedy-and-must-be-reviewed/
Can appreciate how Hindoos have found meaningful reasons to maintain and preserve even the more aggressive bulls that can't be made to do any of the work that domesticated bulls do. This is far better than what aliens would do: destroy such bulls and eat them, or use them for meaningless AmriKKKan rodeos etc (<- where are the animal rights activists on that, btw).
It is important to keep in mind that the domestication of certain animal species has made them reliant on humans: they will not last long in the extreme wild. And in this context, Hindoos have allowed a place for aggressive bulls, where it can yet survive in human society despite not behaving like other domesticated bulls.
But as Senthil's article shows, with the banning of Jallikattu, they are likely to end up on christoislamaniac's dining plates, since Hindoo society can no longer maintain these animals, as Hindoos won't be able to justify the costs of keeping these bulls in their kingly life all year-round any more, as there are no returns in *any* sense.
Ultimately, what the so-called "animals activists" would have gained was a (not quick but painful) halaal death for these fellow creatures, whereas with Jallikattu, these aggressive bulls survived, and moreover had it good by far most of the time. (Plus the Hindoos concerned seem to have friendly feeling toward their Jallikattu bulls.)
Not to mention that it is a Hindu temple tradition of which Krishna took part too, see Senthil et al's writings on the subject which cite both local oral traditions and pan-Hindu Pauranic scriptures for supporting evidence.
Plus, I like the whole thing about how the tradition keeps Tamizh Hindoos valorous: Hindoos can use all the practice they can get at testing their mettle and honing their valour. (Note that, like in The Running Of The Bulls in Pamplona - which of course is not banned, since Basque regions have long been christian - it is the humans and not bulls that tend to get hurt, as explained at the realitycheck blog link above).
The very christian ban on Jallikattu should be seen in light of the equally-christian ban on the piercings that Tamizh Hindoos would undergo for Thaipusam. And - as per a comment at Indiafacts - the Kartigai deepam is now also banned apparently.**
The Thaipusam piercing and Kartigai (Kartikeya) deepam have clearly been silently outlawed: Hindoos weren't even told about it to know to protest against the bans. Whereas Jallikattu required a whole show of native and alien crypto christians playacting at being animal rights activists to get Hindoos to stop this Hindoo tradition.
But make no mistake, in all three cases - piercing for Thaipusam, Kartigai lighting and Jallikattu - the hand behind the ban is christianism, and the reason is solely because these practices are Hindu. Just like christianism tries to obstruct Sabari Malai pilgrimage every year in whichever possible way it can (and even deliberately caused a stampede one year that got many Hindus killed, and this time prevented Hindus from visiting Hindu temple stopovers by forced them into a detour where they'd have to pass through christian church sites instead), and just like christianism tried to discredit the Makara Jyoti associated with the Sabarimalai celebration etc, it is all a christian attempt to end Hindoos observing Hindoo religion.
** That indiafacts comment also mentioned that there has been deliberate interference in Hindoos' attempts to practice the rituals at Kukke Subramanya, a sacred site to Murugan/Subrahmanya in Karnataka.
All of this is christianism.
* vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3457
Jallikattu: Suffocation by Law
by Balakumar Somu on 12 Jan 2015
* vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3456
Jallikattu ban could lead to mass slaughter of bulls
by Senthil on 11 Jan 2015
* realitycheck.wordpress.com/2014/05/22/the-jallikattu-ban-is-a-tragedy-and-must-be-reviewed/
Can appreciate how Hindoos have found meaningful reasons to maintain and preserve even the more aggressive bulls that can't be made to do any of the work that domesticated bulls do. This is far better than what aliens would do: destroy such bulls and eat them, or use them for meaningless AmriKKKan rodeos etc (<- where are the animal rights activists on that, btw).
It is important to keep in mind that the domestication of certain animal species has made them reliant on humans: they will not last long in the extreme wild. And in this context, Hindoos have allowed a place for aggressive bulls, where it can yet survive in human society despite not behaving like other domesticated bulls.
But as Senthil's article shows, with the banning of Jallikattu, they are likely to end up on christoislamaniac's dining plates, since Hindoo society can no longer maintain these animals, as Hindoos won't be able to justify the costs of keeping these bulls in their kingly life all year-round any more, as there are no returns in *any* sense.
Ultimately, what the so-called "animals activists" would have gained was a (not quick but painful) halaal death for these fellow creatures, whereas with Jallikattu, these aggressive bulls survived, and moreover had it good by far most of the time. (Plus the Hindoos concerned seem to have friendly feeling toward their Jallikattu bulls.)
Not to mention that it is a Hindu temple tradition of which Krishna took part too, see Senthil et al's writings on the subject which cite both local oral traditions and pan-Hindu Pauranic scriptures for supporting evidence.
Plus, I like the whole thing about how the tradition keeps Tamizh Hindoos valorous: Hindoos can use all the practice they can get at testing their mettle and honing their valour. (Note that, like in The Running Of The Bulls in Pamplona - which of course is not banned, since Basque regions have long been christian - it is the humans and not bulls that tend to get hurt, as explained at the realitycheck blog link above).
The very christian ban on Jallikattu should be seen in light of the equally-christian ban on the piercings that Tamizh Hindoos would undergo for Thaipusam. And - as per a comment at Indiafacts - the Kartigai deepam is now also banned apparently.**
The Thaipusam piercing and Kartigai (Kartikeya) deepam have clearly been silently outlawed: Hindoos weren't even told about it to know to protest against the bans. Whereas Jallikattu required a whole show of native and alien crypto christians playacting at being animal rights activists to get Hindoos to stop this Hindoo tradition.
But make no mistake, in all three cases - piercing for Thaipusam, Kartigai lighting and Jallikattu - the hand behind the ban is christianism, and the reason is solely because these practices are Hindu. Just like christianism tries to obstruct Sabari Malai pilgrimage every year in whichever possible way it can (and even deliberately caused a stampede one year that got many Hindus killed, and this time prevented Hindus from visiting Hindu temple stopovers by forced them into a detour where they'd have to pass through christian church sites instead), and just like christianism tried to discredit the Makara Jyoti associated with the Sabarimalai celebration etc, it is all a christian attempt to end Hindoos observing Hindoo religion.
** That indiafacts comment also mentioned that there has been deliberate interference in Hindoos' attempts to practice the rituals at Kukke Subramanya, a sacred site to Murugan/Subrahmanya in Karnataka.
All of this is christianism.