BJP Future - 7

[Husky]

(Ravish said I feel sorry for the Hindu hardliners, who made every effort to ensure division of votes on communal lines.

If Ravish (=an NRI) has any relatives in India, here's hoping christoislamania gets them rather than native Hindoos. Hey, I don't mind christoislamania's communal terrorism as long as it's against the likes of Ravish and his kindred. And he certainly wouldn't mind it (and can't complain about it). As seen in his idiotic comment.



Tonikaku.



www.heraldlive.co.za/indias-new-pm-modi-slams-rape-shame-communal-violence/

India’s new PM Modi slams rape shame, communal violence

August 15, 2014 | Filed under: World, | Posted by: Allan Williams



Prime Minister Narendra Modi condemned a spate of rapes as a source of shame for India and urged an end to communal violence on Friday (15/08/2014) as he vowed to improve the lives of the nation’s poor in his first Independence Day speech.

(Why does it sound like he's using the "communal violence" accusation as a lecture against not just the actual culprits but their victims - the usual suspects - as well?)



Modi, the son of a tea vendor who come to power in May, also delivered a withering assessment of the ruling establishment from the ramparts of New Delhi’s 17th century Red Fort as he addressed often taboo subjects such as sexual violence, foeticide, religious unrest and a lack of toilets.



And the right-wing Hindu nationalist restated his solidarity with the wider South Asian region but held back from mentioning India’s great rival Pakistan which is also celebrating its independence 68 years ago.



In one of the most eye-catching passages of a 45-minute speech, Modi said levels of rape had shamed India, and he urged parents to take responsibility for the behaviour of their sons rather than put the onus on their daughters.



“When we hear about these rapes our heads hang in shame,” Modi said.



(Modi conveniently forgot to mention that most of the gang-rapes - certainly the most brutal ones - are committed by christoislamaniac men against Hindoo women. But Modi must avoid the "communal" angle and can't afford to speak of this dimension to the most sadistic rape crimes in India. Perhaps he prefers that the Hindoos should continue to suffer in silence rather than that Modi and gang should get blamed for being "communal" in finger-pointing the most villainous of perpetrators.



I just saw some headline in the Rajeev2004 blog** that India/Modi and BJP gang are going to be dragged into some pre-planned international condemnation scheme - perhaps at some UN summit - on the grounds of not curtailing violence against women and "minorities". Seems to me that Modi is just pre-emptively blaming everyone else so that he and/or his government at least won't get blamed for such 'civil unrest' issues. Which would explain why he readily blames general Indian "parents" for not teaching their sons to "behave" - never mind that it's not the majority Hindu sons that are to blame, but exclusively the unHindus and anti-Hindus who are attacking Hindoo women.



** ADDED: the relevant links

- rajeev2004.blogspot.co.uk/2014/08/fwd-isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi.html

- sunday-guardian.com/news/isi-plans-to-use-us-un-to-tar-modi



A better method of pre-emption would be to do a statistical study of the religion of the victims and the religions of the perpetrators - the victims being always Hindoo women and the perpetrators either christoislamicommunists and otherwise other unHindus/seculars - and then declare capital punishment for any future rapists of Hindoo women, especially if these are of the "minority" religions. That should pro-actively shut the UN "women's rights" plans up before these are launched, by making it a movement for Hindoo women's rights including their right to freedom from christoislamicommunist aka anti-Hindu violence against them.



Likewise Modi appears to be bewailing "religious unrest" and condemning "communal violence", carefully overlooking the fact that Hindus have *always* been on the receiving end of christoislamaniac violence - from the christianised Northeast and islamised Kashmir to christoislamising Bengal down to Kerala and TN.)



“The law will take its own course but as a society every parent has a responsibility to teach their sons the difference between right and wrong.”



Anger over sexual violence has been rising in the last two years, fuelled by a series of high-profile assaults including the fatal gang-rape of a student on a bus in Delhi in December 2012.



The victim’s father, who cannot be named for legal reasons, welcomed Modi’s comments.



“No one says a thing to boys who commit atrocities against women but they are quick to say the mistake must be the girl’s. Modi has sent out a very good message,” he told the NDTV network.



There was also widespread outrage in May when two teenagers were found hanging from a mango tree after being gang-raped in Uttar Pradesh.



The girls, who were aged 14 and 15, were attacked while going to the toilet in fields after dark as – like hundreds of millions of Indians – they did not have a toilet in their own home.



“We are in the 21st century and yet there is still no dignity for women as they have to go out in the open to defecate and they have to wait for darkness to fall. Can you imagine the number of problems they have to face because of this?” Modi told the assembled VIPs.



Modi said India should strive to ensure that every household should have a toilet within the next four years and pledged to ensure that all schools had separate toilet facilities for girls and boys.



The prime minister also called for a change in mindset in a country where a baby boy is still sometimes seen as more of a blessing than a girl – particularly in rural areas.



Despite laws banning parents from finding out the sex of their unborn child, Modi said only 940 girls were being born for every 1,000 boys.



“Who is responsible for this imbalance in our society? I urge the doctors and mothers not to sacrifice their daughters for sons,” he said.



(A post by Dhu on IF from some article very clearly indicated who is responsible: western nations 'graciously' introduced sex-determination into China and India for the express and stated purpose of reducing population growth in both countries since, they knew that both Indians and Chinese would more readily stop reproducing if they produced a male child. But that's another inconvenient fact.

Urging people against infanticide and foeticide is just so much words. But it does push off the blame from the government, since they've clearly made their position on this distasteful topic known.)



Uttar Pradesh, India’s largest state, has also been the scene of several recent flare-ups in communal violence between Hindus and minority Muslims.



Before becoming premier, Modi was chief minister of the western state of Gujarat where he was in charge in 2002 during one of the India’s deadliest chapters of communal violence since independence.



But in his speech, Modi said communal violence was “stalling the growth of the nation” and had gone on for “too long”.



(What was that line? Paraphrased: Even those who do not wield swords can still die by them. And that is the exact plight of Hindus vs christoislamaniacs: it doesn't take two sides aiming for mutual destruction to result in bloodshed. It just takes one missionary terrorist religion bent on convert-or-kill to create genocide. But Hindus will be equally censured - even by the nationalist government they elected - for daring to EVER retaliate even just a little when it becomes too much.

I wonder: if it was Modi's relatives who were massacred by the christian terrorist outfits like NLFT or by islamaniacs, would Modi be lecturing his remaning living relatives against "communal violence" too?)



While Modi has been accused of being too pro-business, he vowed to enable the poorest members of society to open bank accounts as he blamed a surge in suicides among farmers on their inability to pay back money-lenders.



“We will have a prime minister’s people wealth scheme so that even the poorest of the poor can have a bank account of their own,” he said.



The new premier also announced that the central planning commission, which under previous governments drew up Soviet-style five-year economic plans, would be replaced by a new undefined federal institution.



Modi, who has long stressed his “outsider” status, said that since becoming premier he had been taken aback by the departmental infighting and discord between ministries.



“Government should be an organic entity, moving in one direction with a common aim goal. I am trying to break down these walls,” he said.



Initial reaction to his speech was largely positive.



Abhishek Manu Singhvi, a senior figure in the former ruling Congress party, praised “an inclusive, harmonious” speech while Yogendra Yadav of the anti-corruption Aam Aadmi party lauded Modi for speaking “spontaneously and with some conviction”. – AFP

Modi's the one that some Bengali Hindus braved brutalisation by islamania to vote for. I wonder if they'll think he was worth it?



Anyway, good that Israelis do not roll over to Palestinian christoislamaniac terrorism, but when pushed to their limits are willing to answer christoislamania in the only language it understands.



Oh but I forgot, HaindavaKeralam had an interview with Tarun Vijay*** where he explained that India's idiotic condemnation of Israel's recent retaliation against islamaniac aggression should not dent Indian-Israeli relations. Then, IMO, Israel has Every Right to unfairly condemn Modi and BJP concerning Godhra too - and over whatever new manufactured crises concerning christoislamania will follow - and Israel should still expect good relations with India thereafter. Same difference, no?



** Isn't Tarun Vijay that 'nationalist journalist' guy who quickly distanced nationalism from Dara Singh by declaring Dara was "just a tribal"? [Never mind. Vanavasis being HindOO are an inseparable part of the larger collective comprised of all HindOOs. And they would never disown a loyal protector of cows and of Hindus like Dara, one whom the courts admitted was innocent in the Staines murder, even as they then sentenced Dara stating they they felt *someone* had to answer for the illegal missionary's death, even if innocent. <- Only happens in christo-terrorised 3rd world India: that innocent natives have to serve a life sentence for the death of some illegal missionary, in order to appease the international/christian community.]

And IIRC Tarun Vijay was the same guy who was further drooling all over that Syrian christian actress of missionary zeal - "Asin". Since Asin may not be prominent enough in Hindi language movies - some Khan flick introduced Tarun and other Hindi-speakers to Asin - this, I suspect, may finally explain why Tarun had suddenly avidly started learning Tamil: despite the missionary Asin inhabiting Kerala(?), Tarun may have learnt that she had pranced around in several Tamil movies and no doubt he wanted to catch all her film output. Hence his studying Tamil. <- I actually don't think this is an exagerration. Because he waxed insane about the actress in some article. (As in, he made a Total Infatuated Fool of himself.) Syria has many prettier specimens of Syrian females, so Tarun would surely do better to learn Arabic for his purposes.





Another interesting news headline seems to be the following. It's not related to this thread. But, can't be bothered finding the right one for this.



www.heraldlive.co.za/eu-shot-foot-russia-sanctions-hungary/

"EU ‘shot itself in foot’ with Russia sanctions – Hungary"