Three posts of pure spam. But am sure to feel better once it's posted.
Post 1/3
Having avoided much news and articles concerning India during the final days of the election, the relief on hearing that the nationalists had won instead of the anti-nationalists/anti-Hindus, was followed by concern on seeing a certain pattern when catching up on reading many of the articles of the election period written by nationalist supporters.
Some of the articles follow. They don't reflect the BJP's intentions - which I am not acquainted with, but I'm hoping it's more promising than this - but they do reflect what was at this point in time foremost in the minds of the many familiar vocalists who authored these. And that's the worrisome part. Except for Radha Rajan, I don't think anyone else remembered to envisage any kind of actual heathen Hindoo agenda under BJP's rule.
Note: it's not unreasonable for Hindoos to want Hindoo-dom to be a priority at last - moreover, every enemy has viciously pushed their ideology when in power - especially at this time when things have thus far been possibly the bleakest time Hindoo-dom has ever experienced, as Hinduism has not just been oppressed by the enemies but as irreversible de-heathenisation has set in like never before thanks to long-standing social-engineering and gangrene, and the heathenism and its heathens teeter on the brink. Hindus may never get a second chance, after all.
1. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3201
As an aside, this was a sane comment which caught my eye:
2. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3200
Augustine is exempted from my criticism since he's not a heathen. Only a deconvert from christianism. Still, I had anticipated - entirely unreasonably - that he would be more insistent on a restoration of heathenism. Since heathenism has been a fatal victim of the past years of anti-Hindu rule and subversion.
3. indiafacts.co.in/muslims-christians-vote-narendra-modi/
another one by George Augustine, from before the election outcome, appealing to christians and muslims to vote for Modi-led BJP and why this will mean secularism as king.
4. indiafacts.co.in/narendra-modis-challenge-islam/
Gautam Sen
Sen is not actually a heathen - this is obvious from all his articles - but he is a nationalist NRI, and concerned about christo-islamic and western decimation of Indians.
Still, his frequent mention of the plight of "Hindus" led one to believe that he would remember the pitiful state of Hindudom *after* nationalism's victory. But all the discourse seems to be about a secular future.
5. rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2014/05/fwd-how-modi-should-ensure-india-sees.html
A brief glance over the contents showed about nothing in the 6 point agenda about restoring Hindu heathenism after the brutal battering it has received at the hands of the previous, christian govt (Congress). And this despite Sanjeev Nayyar usually advertising for Indic religions under some umbrella.
6. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3199
Radha Rajan is the only one that actually remembered Hindudom, and nice to see she remembers some of the Hindus still being crushed by the christian inquisition too.
Again, the above views by their various authors don't necessarily reflect that of BJP's intended goals during their governance. The point is that the above shows how quickly almost all of them have switched gear from 1. feeling the urgency of the threat faced by Hindoo heathenism (the threat was and remains extinction, by the way), to 2. forgetting the crimes of the enemies who conspired against Hindu-dom and consequently the nation - and which enemies have *not* forsaken their stated and intended goal, it has merely been delayed - and to 3. the unreasonable and wholly undeserved magnanimity of the victors to the treacherous 5th columns infesting India. Almost all their talk has turned to development and other secular goals.
Let's say 10 is the number that represents Hindoo heathenism** at full strength (by which I mean **traditional i.e. HindOO heathenism alone, i.e. the native religion of "polytheistic idolatry" - with no apologies, as nothing else is under pointed attack).
At the birth of the modern post-colonial era of Indian history, the strength of Hindoo heathenism was at an index value of 6 and slid down towards 5.
After the recent decades of the crypto-christian rule by the congress govt, culminating in the period of accelerated conversion and oppression of the Hindoos post Papal mandate to convert Asia, the strength index has fallen to between 3 and 4.
Now, if the "Hindu nationalist" party of the BJP ends up being as neutral towards Hindoo objectives as many of the above writers impute, and end up not doing anything relevant for Hindoo-dom but bring in just plain, fair (secular) governance - no matter *how* honest and how excellent the policies - the strength index may not fall lower during BJP rule, but it will not be restored to 6 again let alone to 10. And *when* the enemies take over once more (as they undoubtedly will one day, if all that the BJP end up providing is a balanced, effective, secular rule), then the Hindoo strength index will continue to plummet from the pathetic value of 3 to below restorative numbers. When it hits 0 it is extinct, although when it hits 2 it already implies extinction.
What I am trying to say is that the BJP - if indeed it is Hindu nationalist - must do whatever it can to restore Hindu heathenism's strength to > 5, preferrably 6. And that's assuming that all other things are equal: i.e. assuming that the rate of subversion and de-heathenisation remains constant (yet it is not constant and was actually accelerating by generation and even decade by now), and assuming that any anti-Hindu governments that may loom on India's horizon in future don't try yet more desperate methods than the Congress/communist parties have so far, and increase the rate of de-Hinduisation and conversion of the nation. Otherwise another period of anti-Hindu rule won't leave Hindoo-dom at 3 when/if a nationalist party takes over thereafter, but they may find a native religion past the point of recovery. (Personally I think it past the point of recovery already, based on what passes for "Hinduism" these days among vocalists/self-professed 'defenders' - itself a subversion - and also the rate of the spread of gangrene/self de-heathenisation.)
BJP cannot merely focuss on good governance and developing India. Hindoos don't have the luxury anymore. Mere good governance was what was required immediately after independence, though that would merely have delayed the severe blow christo-islamism has dealt Hindoo heathenism in its subcontinental homeland. It is too late for Hindoo heathenism if good governance is all that Hindoos may expect from the nationalist government. BJP owes Hindoos - it is the *Hindoo* majority that put them in charge, not any minorities. And any Hindu nationalists in the BJP owe it to their religion to restore it to strength, else their attempts at governance can only be regarded a failure from the POV of Hindoo religio-civilisation.
There is no other chance in future, at some later date. There is only now. As with all things in life, people live and die by their choices. There is no chance at redoing missed chances hereafter: once it's dead, it's gone, never to be resurrected (look at most of the west).
If they ever want Hindoo religion to survive, BJP needs to make restoration and restitution of Hindoo-heathenism a priority. I'm not looking at Buddhism-peddler Arun Shourie here, but any old HindOOs in the party. (I know some older BJP members in Tamizh Nadu are Hindoo heathens.) I think Modi is also a heathen: he seems to be one in his personal life - not merely his private life - but appears to make no larger public aims with this, or else his aims are not transparent, which is not a bad thing but cannot provide immediate reassurance either.
Even if BJP has no aims of reverting the nation - i.e. aiming at reversing the christo-islamisation of India - they have to reverse the christo-conditioning of the nation and restore Hindoo temples and institutions like Mathas and Veda paathashaalas. Hindoo temple lands and wealth must be fully restored, and as this has been stolen from Hindoo temples and donated by christian governments to christoislam, it must be from *their* purses that these things are returned, and *not* from public taxes/the exchequer.
Post 1/3
Having avoided much news and articles concerning India during the final days of the election, the relief on hearing that the nationalists had won instead of the anti-nationalists/anti-Hindus, was followed by concern on seeing a certain pattern when catching up on reading many of the articles of the election period written by nationalist supporters.
Some of the articles follow. They don't reflect the BJP's intentions - which I am not acquainted with, but I'm hoping it's more promising than this - but they do reflect what was at this point in time foremost in the minds of the many familiar vocalists who authored these. And that's the worrisome part. Except for Radha Rajan, I don't think anyone else remembered to envisage any kind of actual heathen Hindoo agenda under BJP's rule.
Note: it's not unreasonable for Hindoos to want Hindoo-dom to be a priority at last - moreover, every enemy has viciously pushed their ideology when in power - especially at this time when things have thus far been possibly the bleakest time Hindoo-dom has ever experienced, as Hinduism has not just been oppressed by the enemies but as irreversible de-heathenisation has set in like never before thanks to long-standing social-engineering and gangrene, and the heathenism and its heathens teeter on the brink. Hindus may never get a second chance, after all.
1. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3201
Quote:Verdict 2014: Awakening of Bharatââ¬â¢s Kundalini
by Virendra Parekh on 17 May 2014 6 Comments
[...]
We can expect not just transfer of power, but transformation of the State. The election verdict marks the first decisive step towards dismantling of the Nehruvian political order that has dominated our public life since Independence. Its consequences will keep unfolding for months, years and decades. While its immediate effects will be felt in the economy and politics, the more lasting changes will be felt in the social realm. The perceptions, relations and power equations among castes - forward, backward and SCs - and between Hindus and non-Hindus will change materially and we shall see a more cohesive and integrated society.
(Even as christians and muslims will return to what they do during such periods: biding their time until their next coup of Indian polity. They work by "Try, try again" after all. Nothing has changed, certainly not their mandate for converting the country to monotheism. As long as missionary religions are around - and especially the christo-class virus - the threat remains to the ancestral heathen religion of any space and its adherents.)
[...]
Modi succeeded because Hindus who are (genuinely) secular by nature trusted him and decided to give him a chance. Modiââ¬â¢s strategy offers a refreshing contrast to Vajpayee and Advani. Both went out of their way to woo Muslims to win acceptability in the secular establishment. Modi made secularistsââ¬â¢ certificates irrelevant.
As an aside, this was a sane comment which caught my eye:
Quote:The most important derivative from this election is the slowing down of Vatican's plan to Christianise India.Already,rogues like John Dayal and his team were in the US to spread canard against Modi.In my own humble submission,one of the most important decision to be taken by Modi government should be to drastically cut down on the number of schools run by the Catholic church,which is producing torrent of anti-Hindu,Hindus.All those who speak against BJP and Modi are products of Catholic institutions.Infact,Christianisation of Hindus is far more dangerous than Jihadi voilence.
S.S.Nagaraj
May 20, 2014
2. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3200
Quote:What we can expect after May 16
by George Augustine on 16 May 2014 0 Comment
Augustine is exempted from my criticism since he's not a heathen. Only a deconvert from christianism. Still, I had anticipated - entirely unreasonably - that he would be more insistent on a restoration of heathenism. Since heathenism has been a fatal victim of the past years of anti-Hindu rule and subversion.
3. indiafacts.co.in/muslims-christians-vote-narendra-modi/
another one by George Augustine, from before the election outcome, appealing to christians and muslims to vote for Modi-led BJP and why this will mean secularism as king.
4. indiafacts.co.in/narendra-modis-challenge-islam/
Gautam Sen
Sen is not actually a heathen - this is obvious from all his articles - but he is a nationalist NRI, and concerned about christo-islamic and western decimation of Indians.
Still, his frequent mention of the plight of "Hindus" led one to believe that he would remember the pitiful state of Hindudom *after* nationalism's victory. But all the discourse seems to be about a secular future.
5. rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2014/05/fwd-how-modi-should-ensure-india-sees.html
Quote:Fwd: How Modi should ensure India sees 'acche din' by sanjeev nayyar in Rediff.com
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: sanjeev nayyar
How Modi should ensure India sees 'acche din' by sanjeev nayyar in Rediff. [color="#0000FF"]6 points Economy, Defence, Foreign Affairs, Reintegrate North-East with rest of India, Out of box ideas, Talk less work more.[/color]
rediff.com/news/slide-show/slide-show-1-ls-election-how-modi-should-ensure-india-sees-acche-din/20140521.htm 21/5/14
Sanjeev Nayyar chalks out a detailed six-point agenda for the new National Democratic Alliance government led by Narendra Modi.
A brief glance over the contents showed about nothing in the 6 point agenda about restoring Hindu heathenism after the brutal battering it has received at the hands of the previous, christian govt (Congress). And this despite Sanjeev Nayyar usually advertising for Indic religions under some umbrella.
6. vijayvaani.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?aid=3199
Quote:Narendra Modi: Subramania Bharatiââ¬â¢s vision of rising India
by Radha Rajan on 15 May 2014 14 Comments
[...]
Sonia Gandhi embroiled even sensitive agencies like Military Intelligence to invent saffron terror and incarcerated Pujya Swami Aseemanand and Sadhvi Pragya. It may be noted that they have not been charge-sheeted yet. This Sonia Gandhi managed to do because she successfully sold the Hindu terror lemon to leaders of Hindu organisations who believed they were the intended targets of Swami Aseemanand and Sadhvi Pragya, and therefore failed to speak up for them and work for their release.
[...]
Radha Rajan is the only one that actually remembered Hindudom, and nice to see she remembers some of the Hindus still being crushed by the christian inquisition too.
Again, the above views by their various authors don't necessarily reflect that of BJP's intended goals during their governance. The point is that the above shows how quickly almost all of them have switched gear from 1. feeling the urgency of the threat faced by Hindoo heathenism (the threat was and remains extinction, by the way), to 2. forgetting the crimes of the enemies who conspired against Hindu-dom and consequently the nation - and which enemies have *not* forsaken their stated and intended goal, it has merely been delayed - and to 3. the unreasonable and wholly undeserved magnanimity of the victors to the treacherous 5th columns infesting India. Almost all their talk has turned to development and other secular goals.
Let's say 10 is the number that represents Hindoo heathenism** at full strength (by which I mean **traditional i.e. HindOO heathenism alone, i.e. the native religion of "polytheistic idolatry" - with no apologies, as nothing else is under pointed attack).
At the birth of the modern post-colonial era of Indian history, the strength of Hindoo heathenism was at an index value of 6 and slid down towards 5.
After the recent decades of the crypto-christian rule by the congress govt, culminating in the period of accelerated conversion and oppression of the Hindoos post Papal mandate to convert Asia, the strength index has fallen to between 3 and 4.
Now, if the "Hindu nationalist" party of the BJP ends up being as neutral towards Hindoo objectives as many of the above writers impute, and end up not doing anything relevant for Hindoo-dom but bring in just plain, fair (secular) governance - no matter *how* honest and how excellent the policies - the strength index may not fall lower during BJP rule, but it will not be restored to 6 again let alone to 10. And *when* the enemies take over once more (as they undoubtedly will one day, if all that the BJP end up providing is a balanced, effective, secular rule), then the Hindoo strength index will continue to plummet from the pathetic value of 3 to below restorative numbers. When it hits 0 it is extinct, although when it hits 2 it already implies extinction.
What I am trying to say is that the BJP - if indeed it is Hindu nationalist - must do whatever it can to restore Hindu heathenism's strength to > 5, preferrably 6. And that's assuming that all other things are equal: i.e. assuming that the rate of subversion and de-heathenisation remains constant (yet it is not constant and was actually accelerating by generation and even decade by now), and assuming that any anti-Hindu governments that may loom on India's horizon in future don't try yet more desperate methods than the Congress/communist parties have so far, and increase the rate of de-Hinduisation and conversion of the nation. Otherwise another period of anti-Hindu rule won't leave Hindoo-dom at 3 when/if a nationalist party takes over thereafter, but they may find a native religion past the point of recovery. (Personally I think it past the point of recovery already, based on what passes for "Hinduism" these days among vocalists/self-professed 'defenders' - itself a subversion - and also the rate of the spread of gangrene/self de-heathenisation.)
BJP cannot merely focuss on good governance and developing India. Hindoos don't have the luxury anymore. Mere good governance was what was required immediately after independence, though that would merely have delayed the severe blow christo-islamism has dealt Hindoo heathenism in its subcontinental homeland. It is too late for Hindoo heathenism if good governance is all that Hindoos may expect from the nationalist government. BJP owes Hindoos - it is the *Hindoo* majority that put them in charge, not any minorities. And any Hindu nationalists in the BJP owe it to their religion to restore it to strength, else their attempts at governance can only be regarded a failure from the POV of Hindoo religio-civilisation.
There is no other chance in future, at some later date. There is only now. As with all things in life, people live and die by their choices. There is no chance at redoing missed chances hereafter: once it's dead, it's gone, never to be resurrected (look at most of the west).
If they ever want Hindoo religion to survive, BJP needs to make restoration and restitution of Hindoo-heathenism a priority. I'm not looking at Buddhism-peddler Arun Shourie here, but any old HindOOs in the party. (I know some older BJP members in Tamizh Nadu are Hindoo heathens.) I think Modi is also a heathen: he seems to be one in his personal life - not merely his private life - but appears to make no larger public aims with this, or else his aims are not transparent, which is not a bad thing but cannot provide immediate reassurance either.
Even if BJP has no aims of reverting the nation - i.e. aiming at reversing the christo-islamisation of India - they have to reverse the christo-conditioning of the nation and restore Hindoo temples and institutions like Mathas and Veda paathashaalas. Hindoo temple lands and wealth must be fully restored, and as this has been stolen from Hindoo temples and donated by christian governments to christoislam, it must be from *their* purses that these things are returned, and *not* from public taxes/the exchequer.