Christoislamics (of the islamic subvariety) set off 2 christoislamaniac bomb blasts in what western news openly describes as a Hindu district of Hyderabad.
Current fatality count as per latest western news is at 20 dead (probably all Hindus, and yes, the religious identity of the victims, as of the perpetrators MATTERS).
Older news still cites as "at least 13 dead":
www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/world/asia/deadly-bombings-hit-southern-india-city.html?_r=0
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Hyderabad-struggles-to-shake-off-terror-tag/articleshow/18621292.cms
The crypto-islamic home minister Shinde (who apparently prays at islamic dargahs in Kashmir*, all while screeching at Hindus and Hinduism), along with fellow-islamic Asaduddin Owaisi is busy declaring that people should not jump to conclusions.
[* Although dargahs - as we know from Mali - are idolatrous and halal as per true islamics, and islamics are welcome to demolish them. Including in christoislamic-occupied Hindu India.
After all, dargahs are an internal affair of christoislamania. So if islamaniacs were to blow them up, I don't really need to care.]
www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1739666/20-killed-as-bomb-blasts-hit-India
Meanwhile, assorted loser "nationalists" allergic to all things called Hindu, will be reiterating that there's no such thing as "Hindus" and hence that no one (identifiable or of any consequence) had died in these terrorist attacks. No?
And oh, can Shinde's daughters (does he have daughters?) be delivered into the hands of love jihadis? (Hey, naturally I disapprove. But desperate times... And rather them than my relatives, nah? Islamania *must* have blood and *will* devour women, after all. And unless sacrifices are offered, it will *take* sacrifices of its own choosing. So better that Hindus give islam the expendables. Since my relatives are Hindu and don't have anti-Hindu dads that are protectionists of islamic terror, whereas Shinde's daughters are the daughters of Shinde, so no doubt he'll be pleased when they are uh wed to islam.) If not, maybe then Shindig will act against islamania, unless by that time he's drooling all over his islamic numerous sons-in-law, in which case, no harm done, right?
(Sort of like how after islamaniac terror blew up the cousin or something of Mira Kamdar, she's not been yelling - as much? - anti-Hindu pro-islamic-terror rants? These people never learn until it hits home. Until then they preach peace to Hindu victims. Then their own loser relatives get the raw end of the deal and it's all not so hot and happening anymore.)
Actually, this is a great idea! Albeit very unethical (but then, the enemy is unethical, and being ignorant of ethics myself :husky:, I am forced to learn it from them.) Hindus should facilitate matchmaking between anti-Hindu (crypto) politicians' female relatives and the love jihadis. Start with that female West Bengali judge or politician or something whom Gautam Sen brought up, the one who overruled Hindu parents protesting abouth their severely under-age Hindu daughter (12 yrs old?) kidnapped by islamaniacs and thus "wed" to islamania, by declaring this was all perfectly legal as this was an 'islamic right': it was in line with sharia for islamaniacs to kidnap, rape and islamise Hindu kaffirs, and unlawful for Hindu parents to protest this. So Hindu activists can start by matchmaking said WB official's daughters into islamaniac love jihadis' hands and let's see how complacent said official is afterwards.
Sure, it's unfair to the daughters. On the other hand, their mother 'raised' them, so there's >90% that they're like her. And the other 10% just underlines that as life is unfair anyway, rather them than anyone I care about. That's the law of life isn't it? Isn't it? I mean, if unfairness is not the unwritten rule of life, why are the innocent terrorised and the terrorists promoted? Hindus owe nothing to do these people. So redirect the love jihad towards the people who Deserve It. At worst, the traitors will be pleased at the matches thus made. At best, their anti-Hindu political relatives will finally start taking action against christoislamania, since the matter would have hit home. Or they will shut up at last (which also counts as a positive development.)
Hindus being incapable of terrorism - having always preferred direct face-to-face warfare (the very opposite of the backstabbing that christoislamania prefers and indulges in), they naturally can't enter into terrorism. Therefore, they need to personally - i.e. actively - ensure that the inevitable love jihads are redirected onto families deserving of this, rather than onto innocent Hindu families. Life may be unfair, but Hindus can even the odds this way, nah? Surely since islamics' love jihad is not even recognised as a crime according to India's christogovt, this means that any Hindus who 'facilitate' love jihad by directing/delivering the offspring of the treacherous into the claws of islam is an even lesser crime? No? (<- Hey, I AM good at ethics after all. See? Who said you can't learn ethics/morality and the other 'humane' stuff from observing the behaviour of christoislamania? I've learnt it so perfectly now.)
"Do unto others before they do unto you." Very biblical (as the babble preaches hypocrisy in practise. Refer to all of history for examples and evidence.)
In other words: Betray the traitors (and their kin) before they betray you (and yours).
I would.
Current fatality count as per latest western news is at 20 dead (probably all Hindus, and yes, the religious identity of the victims, as of the perpetrators MATTERS).
Older news still cites as "at least 13 dead":
www.nytimes.com/2013/02/22/world/asia/deadly-bombings-hit-southern-india-city.html?_r=0
timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/hyderabad/Hyderabad-struggles-to-shake-off-terror-tag/articleshow/18621292.cms
The crypto-islamic home minister Shinde (who apparently prays at islamic dargahs in Kashmir*, all while screeching at Hindus and Hinduism), along with fellow-islamic Asaduddin Owaisi is busy declaring that people should not jump to conclusions.
[* Although dargahs - as we know from Mali - are idolatrous and halal as per true islamics, and islamics are welcome to demolish them. Including in christoislamic-occupied Hindu India.
After all, dargahs are an internal affair of christoislamania. So if islamaniacs were to blow them up, I don't really need to care.]
www.sbs.com.au/news/article/1739666/20-killed-as-bomb-blasts-hit-India
Quote:20 killed as bomb blasts hit India
22 Feb 2013 - Source: AAP
[color="#800080"][img caption:][/color] At least 20 people have been killed after bombs exploded in the southern Indian city of Hyderabad. (AAP)
Cricket Australia say they're monitoring the situation after two deadly bomb blasts in Hyderabad, the venue for the second Test.
Twin bombings killed at least 20 people on Thursday outside a popular cinema and bus stand in the Indian city of Hyderabad, provoking safety fears among Australia's touring cricket team.
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh said the perpetrators of the "dastardly act" would be punished. It came with the nation on alert after the recent hanging of a separatist unleashed protests in the Muslim-majority region of Kashmir.
The evening bombings targeted a mainly Hindu district in Hyderabad, a hub of India's computing industry in the southern state of Andhra Pradesh which hosts local offices of Google and Microsoft among other Western IT companies.
Witnesses said one of the crude devices went off around 15 yards from the entrance to the Venkatadri Cinema in the popular retail district of Dilsukh Nagar and the second exploded next to a nearby bus stop.
The first explosion went off just as movie-goers were making their way out of the cinema at the end of a show. Some had stopped at food stalls when the deafening blast went off.
A government minister said the bombs, which went off in quick succession, were planted on bicycles. The charred wreckage of parked scooters lay on the ground, mingled with the blood and footwear of victims who included two women.
Doctors struggled to treat a stream of wounded victims as bloodied patients lay on stretchers at city hospitals and anguished relatives clamoured for news of their loved ones, an AFP photographer saw.
Hyderabad is due to host a Test cricket match between Australia and India from March 2 but a statement from the Australian side said it was now in talks with Indian authorities and stressed that the safety of its players was "paramount".
Hyderabad deputy inspector of police Shiv Kumar said there was no doubt that "this is a terror attack" while adding there had been no claim of responsibility.
Twenty people died in the attack, said Kumar, while an officer in the police control room said 82 people had been wounded.
Sreekanth Rao, a doctor at the city's Yashoda hospital, said several of those injured were in a life-threatening condition.
"Five people are being operated on. We had to amputate a 22-year-old woman's leg because that was the only way we could save her," he told AFP.
"This is a dastardly act and the guilty will not go unpunished," Prime Minister Singh said of the attacks, the most serious to hit India since 13 people died in a 2011 bombing outside the High Court in the capital New Delhi.
But Singh also appealed for "calm" in the aftermath of the Hyderabad blasts, as police struggled to keep order with large crowds massing at the scene.
[color="#0000FF"]N. Kiran Reddy, the chief minister of Andhra Pradesh, told reporters in Hyderabad that the blasts were intended to incite communal violence in the city, which has a large Muslim population.
"This attack is only to disturb all communities living in the city. I request people to maintain calm and they should not visit the blast site."[/color]
[color="#800080"](What??? So now the christoislamaniacs didn't do it to blow up the Hindus, but 'only' to incite anger against the christoislamania that blew Hindus up?
Essentially the crypto Kiran Reddy is saying that the Hindus having been murdered - by christoislamania - does not matter. That the christoislamic terrorism should not be punished, but rather that any *communalised* response to the christoislamic terrorism must be suppressed.
But there is one thing that the obvious crypto Kiran Reddy has admitted to: if the bomb blasts and the massacre of Hindus was indeed to incite communal violence between islamics and Hindus in Hyderabad, it must be calculated christian terrorism. Since Hindoos don't blow up Hindus - they even refuse to blow up anyone else, but they certainly wouldn't blow up Hindus.
And as Kiran as implied that it cannot be the islamaniacs, therefore he has indirectly admitted that it must be christians. No? It's either one or the other Kiran, can't have it both ways. It's either a conspiracy to "incite communal violence" btw islamaniacs and Hindus - caused by 3rd party christianism - or it is not a conspiracy and it a straightforward massacre of Hindus by islamaniacs yet again.)[/color]
Foreign Secretary Ranjan Mathai, the top civil servant in India's external affairs ministry, did not rule out foreign involvement.
"I am not sure there is any evidence it could be homegrown terrorism. We have had a number of attacks which have been traced to inspiration or leadership outside the country," he said at a Washington think-tank.
(O for goodness sake. Isn't it a bit premature to start declaring what the evidence - still being gathered - does or does not say about the locus of origin of the terrorist group? All that can be said without a doubt is that the terrorism is christoislamic - that's just a given that is beyond doubt, though the christoislamic brains are no doubt brainstorming on how they can spin this into an inversion as well.
Since the crypto-islamic Shinde - who recently brought up that christist concoction of "Hindu terror" again - will be unable to pin this one on Hindus, and in order to protect the culprit of islamania in this, he will end by desperately and lamely declaring that the Hindus spontaneously combusted here also, just as christoism had declared Hindus had spontaneously combusted when islamaniac terrorists had attacked and set fire to that train in Gujarat.)
Meanwhile, assorted loser "nationalists" allergic to all things called Hindu, will be reiterating that there's no such thing as "Hindus" and hence that no one (identifiable or of any consequence) had died in these terrorist attacks. No?
And oh, can Shinde's daughters (does he have daughters?) be delivered into the hands of love jihadis? (Hey, naturally I disapprove. But desperate times... And rather them than my relatives, nah? Islamania *must* have blood and *will* devour women, after all. And unless sacrifices are offered, it will *take* sacrifices of its own choosing. So better that Hindus give islam the expendables. Since my relatives are Hindu and don't have anti-Hindu dads that are protectionists of islamic terror, whereas Shinde's daughters are the daughters of Shinde, so no doubt he'll be pleased when they are uh wed to islam.) If not, maybe then Shindig will act against islamania, unless by that time he's drooling all over his islamic numerous sons-in-law, in which case, no harm done, right?
(Sort of like how after islamaniac terror blew up the cousin or something of Mira Kamdar, she's not been yelling - as much? - anti-Hindu pro-islamic-terror rants? These people never learn until it hits home. Until then they preach peace to Hindu victims. Then their own loser relatives get the raw end of the deal and it's all not so hot and happening anymore.)
Actually, this is a great idea! Albeit very unethical (but then, the enemy is unethical, and being ignorant of ethics myself :husky:, I am forced to learn it from them.) Hindus should facilitate matchmaking between anti-Hindu (crypto) politicians' female relatives and the love jihadis. Start with that female West Bengali judge or politician or something whom Gautam Sen brought up, the one who overruled Hindu parents protesting abouth their severely under-age Hindu daughter (12 yrs old?) kidnapped by islamaniacs and thus "wed" to islamania, by declaring this was all perfectly legal as this was an 'islamic right': it was in line with sharia for islamaniacs to kidnap, rape and islamise Hindu kaffirs, and unlawful for Hindu parents to protest this. So Hindu activists can start by matchmaking said WB official's daughters into islamaniac love jihadis' hands and let's see how complacent said official is afterwards.
Sure, it's unfair to the daughters. On the other hand, their mother 'raised' them, so there's >90% that they're like her. And the other 10% just underlines that as life is unfair anyway, rather them than anyone I care about. That's the law of life isn't it? Isn't it? I mean, if unfairness is not the unwritten rule of life, why are the innocent terrorised and the terrorists promoted? Hindus owe nothing to do these people. So redirect the love jihad towards the people who Deserve It. At worst, the traitors will be pleased at the matches thus made. At best, their anti-Hindu political relatives will finally start taking action against christoislamania, since the matter would have hit home. Or they will shut up at last (which also counts as a positive development.)
Hindus being incapable of terrorism - having always preferred direct face-to-face warfare (the very opposite of the backstabbing that christoislamania prefers and indulges in), they naturally can't enter into terrorism. Therefore, they need to personally - i.e. actively - ensure that the inevitable love jihads are redirected onto families deserving of this, rather than onto innocent Hindu families. Life may be unfair, but Hindus can even the odds this way, nah? Surely since islamics' love jihad is not even recognised as a crime according to India's christogovt, this means that any Hindus who 'facilitate' love jihad by directing/delivering the offspring of the treacherous into the claws of islam is an even lesser crime? No? (<- Hey, I AM good at ethics after all. See? Who said you can't learn ethics/morality and the other 'humane' stuff from observing the behaviour of christoislamania? I've learnt it so perfectly now.)
"Do unto others before they do unto you." Very biblical (as the babble preaches hypocrisy in practise. Refer to all of history for examples and evidence.)
In other words: Betray the traitors (and their kin) before they betray you (and yours).
I would.