03-20-2005, 05:54 AM
Future of Kashmir !!!!
My dear Sir,
does the thought ever occur to your goodself that what
would have happened if like pakistan India would have
become a hindu state.
SOME SAY THAT INDIA WOULD NOT HAVE HAD THE COMMUNAL CLASHES AND THE
MURDERS OF THE MINORITIES THAT WE HAVE IN INDIA TODAY DUE TO THE BETTER
BALANCE IN POPULATION. MUSLIMS WOULD HAVE KEPT THE HINDU ZEALOTS IN
CHECK AND LIFE WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER.
A democracy is any day far far better than a religious
state or autocarcy or dictatorship.
REALLY!!! WHAT NA EPOCH SHATTERING REVELATION. NOBODY ON THIS FORUM KNEW
THAT. WOULD YOU MIND TELLING THAT TO THE RSS, VHP, SHIV SENA, BAJRANG
DAL, PANUN KASHMIR.
Well your statement about muslims staying back because
hindu's wanted them to stay back....... is nothing but
sheer nonsense. You seem to have developed a tunnel
vision about the world around you.
OK, PERHAPS YOU COULD ENLIGHTEN US ALL AS TO WHY SO MANY MUSLIMS LEFT
AND SO MANY STAYED BACK. ALL HAD THE SAME RELIGION, ALL KNEW THE BASIS
OF THE CREATION OF THE NEW COUNTRY, ALL KNEW THE REASONS FOR THE
PARTITION?
I don't get my facts from Movies like you. I don't
need to talk numbers Sir, the very fact the number of
muslims in India today outnumber their Pakistani
counterparts states it all.
STATES WHAT??? THAT BEING IN BIG NUMBERS IN INDIA HAS GUARANTEED
SECURITY OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FOR MUSLIMS, OR GUARANTEED THEIR ECONOMIC
FUTURE, OR THEIR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, OR THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, OR ENSURED
JUSTICE TO THEM (LIKE IN GODHRA AND BHIWNADI). AND THAT IT IS NOT SO IN
PAKISTAN, INDONESIA, BANGLADESH??? PLEASE DO ELABORATE.
And why in God's name have Bihar, Assam and other
states come in this ongoing debate regarding the
chances of Kashmir being the IT hub of India. You
statements do not make any sense Gauhar.
EVIDENTLY IT TAKES YOU LONG TO UNDERSTAND, AMIT. BUT DO NOT LOSE HEART I
AM HERE. I WILL HELP YOU. LOOK, YOU SEEM TO THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE A
STATE IS IN INDIA IT HAS THE AUTOMATIC POTENTIAL OF BECOMING NA I.T HUB.
WHAT I TRIED TO SHOW YOU WAS THE REALITY OF BEING A STATE IN INDIA IF
YOU DID NOT HAPPEN TO BE PART OF THE CERTAIN RULING CLASS OR THE BRAHMIN
SOCIETY. EVEN A PLACE LIKE KERALA, WHERE THERE IS 99% LITERACY IS NOT NA
IT HUB!!
KASHMIR COULD BECOME NA IT HUB JUST AS WELL ON ITS OWN, OR BY MERGING
WITH ANY OF ITS NEIGHBORS. PAKISTAN IS ALSO A SMALL HUB AND GROWING AT A
FAST PACE. IF THEY CAN DO IT ANYONE CAN. BEING INSIDE INDIA IS NO
GUARANTEE, ASK ANY OF THE STATES THAT I MENTIONED. THE UNDERLYING
FACTORS FOR KASHMIR NOT BECOMING NA IT HUB GET EVEN MORE COMPLICATED
BECAUSE WE ARE MUSLIMS WITH NA INDEPENDENT OPINION. THE SAME DYNAMIC
WORKS AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF THE CHRISTIANS OF THE NORTH EASTERN
STATES AS WELL. AS I SAID, HINDUTA JUST DOES NOT HAVE ANY SPACE FOR
ISLAM. GOT IT?
JUDGING BY YOUR COMMENT BELOW, EVIDENTLY NOT.
SO, LETS SEE, HINDUTA IS TRYING HARD TO TOLERATE ISLAM??? WHY? WHAT
WOULD HAVE BEEN THE MORE DESIRABLE THING FOR HINDUVTA TO DO? WHAT IT
TRIED TO DO THROUGH THE PUNDITS AND JAGMOHAN IN KASHMIR? OR WHAT IT
TRIED TO DO IN AYODHYA, GODHRA ETC??
Hindutava has so much space for Islam that it is
tolerating you on its very heart when you are
badmouthing it and wounding it.
Had ever KP's wanted land, they would have laid claim
to the entire Kashmir.
HMMMM...KEEP DREAMING....
GAUHAR
My dear Sir,
does the thought ever occur to your goodself that what
would have happened if like pakistan India would have
become a hindu state.
SOME SAY THAT INDIA WOULD NOT HAVE HAD THE COMMUNAL CLASHES AND THE
MURDERS OF THE MINORITIES THAT WE HAVE IN INDIA TODAY DUE TO THE BETTER
BALANCE IN POPULATION. MUSLIMS WOULD HAVE KEPT THE HINDU ZEALOTS IN
CHECK AND LIFE WOULD HAVE BEEN BETTER.
A democracy is any day far far better than a religious
state or autocarcy or dictatorship.
REALLY!!! WHAT NA EPOCH SHATTERING REVELATION. NOBODY ON THIS FORUM KNEW
THAT. WOULD YOU MIND TELLING THAT TO THE RSS, VHP, SHIV SENA, BAJRANG
DAL, PANUN KASHMIR.
Well your statement about muslims staying back because
hindu's wanted them to stay back....... is nothing but
sheer nonsense. You seem to have developed a tunnel
vision about the world around you.
OK, PERHAPS YOU COULD ENLIGHTEN US ALL AS TO WHY SO MANY MUSLIMS LEFT
AND SO MANY STAYED BACK. ALL HAD THE SAME RELIGION, ALL KNEW THE BASIS
OF THE CREATION OF THE NEW COUNTRY, ALL KNEW THE REASONS FOR THE
PARTITION?
I don't get my facts from Movies like you. I don't
need to talk numbers Sir, the very fact the number of
muslims in India today outnumber their Pakistani
counterparts states it all.
STATES WHAT??? THAT BEING IN BIG NUMBERS IN INDIA HAS GUARANTEED
SECURITY OF LIFE AND PROPERTY FOR MUSLIMS, OR GUARANTEED THEIR ECONOMIC
FUTURE, OR THEIR RELIGIOUS FREEDOM, OR THEIR HUMAN RIGHTS, OR ENSURED
JUSTICE TO THEM (LIKE IN GODHRA AND BHIWNADI). AND THAT IT IS NOT SO IN
PAKISTAN, INDONESIA, BANGLADESH??? PLEASE DO ELABORATE.
And why in God's name have Bihar, Assam and other
states come in this ongoing debate regarding the
chances of Kashmir being the IT hub of India. You
statements do not make any sense Gauhar.
EVIDENTLY IT TAKES YOU LONG TO UNDERSTAND, AMIT. BUT DO NOT LOSE HEART I
AM HERE. I WILL HELP YOU. LOOK, YOU SEEM TO THINK THAT JUST BECAUSE A
STATE IS IN INDIA IT HAS THE AUTOMATIC POTENTIAL OF BECOMING NA I.T HUB.
WHAT I TRIED TO SHOW YOU WAS THE REALITY OF BEING A STATE IN INDIA IF
YOU DID NOT HAPPEN TO BE PART OF THE CERTAIN RULING CLASS OR THE BRAHMIN
SOCIETY. EVEN A PLACE LIKE KERALA, WHERE THERE IS 99% LITERACY IS NOT NA
IT HUB!!
KASHMIR COULD BECOME NA IT HUB JUST AS WELL ON ITS OWN, OR BY MERGING
WITH ANY OF ITS NEIGHBORS. PAKISTAN IS ALSO A SMALL HUB AND GROWING AT A
FAST PACE. IF THEY CAN DO IT ANYONE CAN. BEING INSIDE INDIA IS NO
GUARANTEE, ASK ANY OF THE STATES THAT I MENTIONED. THE UNDERLYING
FACTORS FOR KASHMIR NOT BECOMING NA IT HUB GET EVEN MORE COMPLICATED
BECAUSE WE ARE MUSLIMS WITH NA INDEPENDENT OPINION. THE SAME DYNAMIC
WORKS AGAINST THE INTERESTS OF THE CHRISTIANS OF THE NORTH EASTERN
STATES AS WELL. AS I SAID, HINDUTA JUST DOES NOT HAVE ANY SPACE FOR
ISLAM. GOT IT?
JUDGING BY YOUR COMMENT BELOW, EVIDENTLY NOT.
SO, LETS SEE, HINDUTA IS TRYING HARD TO TOLERATE ISLAM??? WHY? WHAT
WOULD HAVE BEEN THE MORE DESIRABLE THING FOR HINDUVTA TO DO? WHAT IT
TRIED TO DO THROUGH THE PUNDITS AND JAGMOHAN IN KASHMIR? OR WHAT IT
TRIED TO DO IN AYODHYA, GODHRA ETC??
Hindutava has so much space for Islam that it is
tolerating you on its very heart when you are
badmouthing it and wounding it.
Had ever KP's wanted land, they would have laid claim
to the entire Kashmir.
HMMMM...KEEP DREAMING....
GAUHAR