The biggest problem regarding Indian genome diversity is actually the boxing into india proper by western-created monotheism. The Indic sphere used to extend up to the Caspian and Indians (Pakistanis) used to move freely within this sphere. Central Asia was actually the lebensraum of the Indians/Pakistanis/Iranians.
This Indic-Iranian zone abutted the steppe spread zone which was the conduit for dispersals to the periphery.
These dispersals were probably a type of genetic safety valve (?)
The Sindoi to the immediate west of the Black sea and the Maeotae to the immediate east actually took the reach right up to Europe itself. Any further in and they would have entered the refugial periphery and lost the connection.
Indic genetic diversity is actually a result of in situ diversification. While the low diversity to the west is a result of budding offs of a subset of the Indic diversity.
East Asia is similar to India and experienced a holocene expansion of NO projecting counterclockwise across Eurasia, very similar to the Indic P/R projecting northwards.
It is not entirely clear what factors allow for the continous generation of in situ diversity in tropical Asia, but the "hybridization" advocated by the herrenvolk is actually a euphemism for extreme loss of diversity - lamost always these are due to genocides. Any future Indic-E Asian expansion will create enough diversity that gotra issues will seem rather trivial. The entire western strategy is geared to stop such an eventuality.
There are two tricks which have surfaced to deny in situ diversification of Tropical Asia. One is that this diversity is actually due to admixture with other hominids (Hammers). Hammers is a compatriot of the imbecile Bamshad.
The other is Reich's approach regarding the northern Denisovan: indirect argumentation that Asiatoc diversity is due to multiple waves of populations intruding into Asia from the West.
So it is good to be on guard regarding these....
This Indic-Iranian zone abutted the steppe spread zone which was the conduit for dispersals to the periphery.
These dispersals were probably a type of genetic safety valve (?)
The Sindoi to the immediate west of the Black sea and the Maeotae to the immediate east actually took the reach right up to Europe itself. Any further in and they would have entered the refugial periphery and lost the connection.
Indic genetic diversity is actually a result of in situ diversification. While the low diversity to the west is a result of budding offs of a subset of the Indic diversity.
East Asia is similar to India and experienced a holocene expansion of NO projecting counterclockwise across Eurasia, very similar to the Indic P/R projecting northwards.
It is not entirely clear what factors allow for the continous generation of in situ diversity in tropical Asia, but the "hybridization" advocated by the herrenvolk is actually a euphemism for extreme loss of diversity - lamost always these are due to genocides. Any future Indic-E Asian expansion will create enough diversity that gotra issues will seem rather trivial. The entire western strategy is geared to stop such an eventuality.
There are two tricks which have surfaced to deny in situ diversification of Tropical Asia. One is that this diversity is actually due to admixture with other hominids (Hammers). Hammers is a compatriot of the imbecile Bamshad.
The other is Reich's approach regarding the northern Denisovan: indirect argumentation that Asiatoc diversity is due to multiple waves of populations intruding into Asia from the West.
So it is good to be on guard regarding these....