Vishwas, your statements in #2 were sensible and correct (and restrained in spite of provocation).
But what was the point? Idiot questions deserve idiot responses. That's the problem with you energy-squandering heathens: you try to reason with everyone.
Bad. Habit.
There is no reasoning with deliberate (self-instilled) stupidity. No correcting people who will refuse to understand your corrections because they have dumbed *themselves* down (or allowed that to happen; same thing). Always respond to people at their level. E.g. if they behave like children, treat them like it. If they behave debile, make sure to debilitate them some more with your response.* They started it.
(* The opposite is true too, of course, but it's more fun to deliberate on avenging willful stupidity.)
Anyway, what is wrong with the tried and tested technique of responding with maniacal laughter to a buffoon's maniacal suggestions (such as in this case)? Personally, was inclined to leave it at my mad muppet laugh of HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. It is so much more called for (and the caps lock is quite disorienting, I think, which I throw in as an extra at no charge). And at only 2 letters in repeat, it is of little effort once added to the copy and paste buffer. Or so I thought.
But uh, did no-one notice the following disturbing mindset giveaway - I mean to draw attention to the first letter of the highlighted words in these bits taken from the opening post:
It's a pity that the opening poll doesn't have a Roman "Thumbs Down" option... I'd vote for that. (I suspect the rest of the general mob would too. To test that hypothesis and to provide a channel for general amusement, [color="#0000FF"]if I were IF admin[/color], I would sneakily add that as a voting option in the opening post, just to see how many readers want the uninvited essayist itself eliminated as the only response to their poll+post :evil grin
But what was the point? Idiot questions deserve idiot responses. That's the problem with you energy-squandering heathens: you try to reason with everyone.
Bad. Habit.
There is no reasoning with deliberate (self-instilled) stupidity. No correcting people who will refuse to understand your corrections because they have dumbed *themselves* down (or allowed that to happen; same thing). Always respond to people at their level. E.g. if they behave like children, treat them like it. If they behave debile, make sure to debilitate them some more with your response.* They started it.
(* The opposite is true too, of course, but it's more fun to deliberate on avenging willful stupidity.)
Anyway, what is wrong with the tried and tested technique of responding with maniacal laughter to a buffoon's maniacal suggestions (such as in this case)? Personally, was inclined to leave it at my mad muppet laugh of HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA. It is so much more called for (and the caps lock is quite disorienting, I think, which I throw in as an extra at no charge). And at only 2 letters in repeat, it is of little effort once added to the copy and paste buffer. Or so I thought.
But uh, did no-one notice the following disturbing mindset giveaway - I mean to draw attention to the first letter of the highlighted words in these bits taken from the opening post:
Quote:Existence of special marital laws for hindus or sikhs may continueYa think the christoconditioning in Indian mis-education could be a little bit less pronounced???? Everyone is becoming so transparently programmed, it's becoming a matter of hysteria. Even without their argumentation to give the game away of who whispered their lame ideas in their ears, even the syntax itself reveals how they're perfect little puppets running around in headless automation long after the puppet-masters left the country and forgot all about them. Such Losers with a capital L.
[...]
Although the couple would be free to marry (within six months) either from a pandit, a sikh priest, a [color="#FF0000"]Christian[/color] priest or a maulvi [...]
It's a pity that the opening poll doesn't have a Roman "Thumbs Down" option... I'd vote for that. (I suspect the rest of the general mob would too. To test that hypothesis and to provide a channel for general amusement, [color="#0000FF"]if I were IF admin[/color], I would sneakily add that as a voting option in the opening post, just to see how many readers want the uninvited essayist itself eliminated as the only response to their poll+post :evil grin
Death to traitors.