Overall, R1b shows unidirectional expansion into Europe. With some of the latter day Empires, there is some variation, but these are trivial..
Given the noncontroversial R1b case, it will be hard to argue for concentric expansion out of the "above the black sea" region for R1a1. All their plausibility arguments are being shorn. Concentric expansion is shown for the theological prop that it is.
Pattern that seems to be emerging is Europe as a battlefield between Mideasterners and S Asians. Indians do not even need any interests in psyops, these scenarios just seem to be gifted to them as a matter of course <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />..
Empires within India are not associated with population movements, probably a result of heathen dynamics (the king simply assumed a token suzerainty); that is, they are not colonial Empires.
Given the noncontroversial R1b case, it will be hard to argue for concentric expansion out of the "above the black sea" region for R1a1. All their plausibility arguments are being shorn. Concentric expansion is shown for the theological prop that it is.
Pattern that seems to be emerging is Europe as a battlefield between Mideasterners and S Asians. Indians do not even need any interests in psyops, these scenarios just seem to be gifted to them as a matter of course <img src='http://www.india-forum.com/forums/public/style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/wink.gif' class='bbc_emoticon' alt='
' />.. Empires within India are not associated with population movements, probably a result of heathen dynamics (the king simply assumed a token suzerainty); that is, they are not colonial Empires.