http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2010/03/r...gnant.html
What was she thinking? (Was she thinking)
- Her choice of freak is already married and she knew it. Since when is that dandy? (And his wife doesn't seem to have been in the know for the whole of it, so interruptions like "open marriage" or "they're swingers" can first wait for more information.)
- Add to the list that he's part of the army of islam.
Again: what was she thinking. Just because he thinks it was Routine to find an extra-marital sexual partner while married (including, one notes, all through his wife's pregnancy and thereafter - what a catch; how he got not one but two women I'll never know), doesn't mean she - what's her name, Pallavi - has to join in. Even though he's the one breaking troth (she's not married, and no one but the married are accountable for their own extramarital choices) - that's assuming they have a concept of troth in islam (I doubt it) - she doesn't need to help him with breaking it.
So not only is her love-interest quite happy adultering and islamaniac - proving she's got NO taste in people (really, isn't it past time to declare it a crime to be tasteless?) - it can hardly come as a surprise that he should turn out a murderer too.
Besides, in the US, IIRC from channel-zapping into crime documentaries and talkshows and from articles, one of the most common causes of death among pregnant women is due to a boyfriend going berserk or pre-meditating her murder. (Usually because of alimony, or because she's going to make things messy with his wife/full-time girlfriend, sometimes because she won't get it aborted, sometimes because she is underage and is going to tell on him unless she gets her way). "Crime of passion" or something I think is what they called it, not sure - going by TV. Anyway, a not infrequent way for the love affair to reach its fatal conclusion is just like that of Pallavi's: murdered in some public restroom, after the farewell intercourse (well, of course - it's for the show's encore). Rather common knowledge, or so I thought. Again, how tranquilised was she to not have seen it coming... I thought I heard Oprah Winfrey etc have a very large viewership in India - all the seculars surely watch (though I can't imagine who else would)?
Am going to make a little table of comparison between the hero and heroine of this latest romance - probably because I can't do such complicated sums in my head:
1. He's quite easy of mind with adultering. She was very willing to be the third wheel. (It's not entirely clear from the text, but it doesn't seem like she was asking to be Islamaniac's Wife No. 2 Of 4, but rather wanting her islamic all to herself without his 1st wife+kid tagging along at their party. Of course, I could be wrong: the angry muslimah wife's fury might merely have been about the prospect of a still/former kaffiri as co-wife, as other muslimahs before her have similarly vented, so who knows...)
2. She's a blackmailer - yeah, that sounds like Real Love to me. He's a murderer - that's even Realer Love - now going to jail. Hmmm, wait... I'm psyching that his 9-month old daughter wants him behind bars till the end and thinks he's a cowardly Loser for murdering people as his Solution to being haunted by consequences of his actions that he doesn't want to face.
3. He's an islamaniac. She's ueber secular.
Tally: How perfectly matched.
And while I'm complaining: why casually abort when it's not threatening her life and when she wasn't raped? In fact, since she imagines herself infatuated with her boyfriend, you'd have thought she'd think it was special enough to keep.
How about these teens-trapped-in-adult-bodies take responsibility for their actions for a change. Most people, when they reach a certain youngish age, realise the world *doesn't* in fact revolve around them. Then they start slightly considering how their actions affect others' lives now and again, and so try to not destroy the entire world in one go. (Even I have occasionally contemplated considering others - only contemplated, mind you; it usually ends in boredom.) But of course not these people and their 'earth-shattering' romance that they just have to tell the world about: "Angry married islamic boyfriend murders blackmailing secular infidel girlfriend in public toilet, after One Last Affair For Old Times' Sake."
Kkkkk....
What a horrid way to die. And what a waste of all the lives involved.
Absolutely none of this needed to have happened. If people just exercised their common sense once in a while.
Like I've always said (maybe not here?): there should be a ban on stupidity. And at the very least a tax on tastelessness (there's so much money to be made in that, I'm surprised no one thought to implement it yet).
Isn't anyone else tired of these childish and horrific Starcrossed Love Stories. Always some bad soap turning into a 2nd rate crime drama, with characters you can't remotely understand, that are so unreal and so people can't really care for. Why can't all the main actors commit quick-and-easy suicide in the first act itself, so we can be spared the predictable gory "denouement" already? Where's the remote control. I've watched this flick before, or all the ones it ripped off from (and they were all B-movies). There's only so much medeleven - what's that, compassion and sympathy? whatever - to go around: mine's very very very limited. I'd rather save the little I have for those innocent Congolese children who're getting stabbed and burned (or, if "lucky", abandoned) by the brutal christomaniacs like their jeebus-possessed parents, because of christianism=terrorism's false charges of witchery again. They didn't court danger. Life just dealt them a bad hand. Oh, and at least they're cute.
Quote:Sunday, March 07, 2010I don't get why people blame the loony woman's parents. It is entirely possible that she's capable of being a fool all by her own efforts - she seems old enough by now to stand solo: and this is *not* the Sexual Jihad targetting her unwitting side. ([color="#0000FF"]ADDED:[/color] If it had been the jihad, her pregnancies would not have ended in termination - but would have gone towards swelling the ummah - and she'd have been the islamic's wife #2 by now.)
Re: (India) Muslim strangles pregnant Hindu girlfriend to death in public toilet
mar 7th, 2010
what a perfect metaphor for:
1. india
2. women's day
3. mf hussain's exploits
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ravi
(India) Muslim murders pregnant Hindu girlfriend in public toilet
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/...656034.cms
Lover murders pregnant girlfriend in public loo
Soumittra S Bose, TNN, Mar 8, 2010
NAGPUR:
Tragedy struck Sakhre family of Bhankheda the second time in just over a month. It had lost eldest son Prateek, 28, to illness just five weeks ago. On Sunday when the family was preparing for the ritual after completion of one-and-quarter month of Prateek's death, the body of their second daughter, 20-year-old Pallavi, was found in community latrine for the women's, strangled to death by her lover. Initial investigations revealed that Pallavi was four months pregnant.
She was allegedly coaxed into physical intimacy before being strangled inside the congested latrine. Sources from Tehsil police station said that Pallavi was smothered before she was throttled with her own kameez and her partially naked body left. Police have arrested Pallavi's paramour Mohammed Shamim, alias Shammi, 25, a married man, for the murder. Police have applied the charge of murder (302 of the Indian Penal Code) but are yet to decide on adding rape charge. Pallavi was first year student of arts' stream in PWS college.
[color="#0000FF"]Shamim, a carpenter, was apparently having an amorous relationship with Pallavi for last two years. She had also undergone abortion once in the past. Sources claimed that Pallavi was demanding some money from Shamim to terminate her pregnancy and also wanted him to marry her. She had threatened Shamim, who is married to Rizwana Parveen and has a nine-month-old daughter, that she would go to his house on Sunday. Police said that this led to an altercation between them resulting in violent end. Sources said that Shamim's wife Rizwana already knew about the affair and was livid about it. Police said that Shammi had called up on Pallavi's younger sister Rinku's cellphone at 10 pm on Saturday. He wanted to speak to Pallavi who was sitting outside the home. [/color]
"My sister left home after the call," said Rinku adding that the family was busy preparing for Sunday's ritual when Pallavi sneaked out of home without speaking to anyone. Family members were worried when she did not return in the night. "We were not sure what to do. This had never happened before. But we did not approach the police," said Pallavi's distraught father Yogeshwar. Pallavi's mother Shardabai, who was sobbing uncontrollably, works with the Nagpur Municipal Corporation. The family wanted to resume searching in the morning as relatives and others were expected at the residence for the rituals. In the morning, it was left shocked when a few women from the neighbourhood raised an alarm seeing body of Pallavi inside the latrine.
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 3/07/2010 10:10:00 PM 4 comments Links to this post
Reactions:
What was she thinking? (Was she thinking)
- Her choice of freak is already married and she knew it. Since when is that dandy? (And his wife doesn't seem to have been in the know for the whole of it, so interruptions like "open marriage" or "they're swingers" can first wait for more information.)
- Add to the list that he's part of the army of islam.
Again: what was she thinking. Just because he thinks it was Routine to find an extra-marital sexual partner while married (including, one notes, all through his wife's pregnancy and thereafter - what a catch; how he got not one but two women I'll never know), doesn't mean she - what's her name, Pallavi - has to join in. Even though he's the one breaking troth (she's not married, and no one but the married are accountable for their own extramarital choices) - that's assuming they have a concept of troth in islam (I doubt it) - she doesn't need to help him with breaking it.
So not only is her love-interest quite happy adultering and islamaniac - proving she's got NO taste in people (really, isn't it past time to declare it a crime to be tasteless?) - it can hardly come as a surprise that he should turn out a murderer too.
Besides, in the US, IIRC from channel-zapping into crime documentaries and talkshows and from articles, one of the most common causes of death among pregnant women is due to a boyfriend going berserk or pre-meditating her murder. (Usually because of alimony, or because she's going to make things messy with his wife/full-time girlfriend, sometimes because she won't get it aborted, sometimes because she is underage and is going to tell on him unless she gets her way). "Crime of passion" or something I think is what they called it, not sure - going by TV. Anyway, a not infrequent way for the love affair to reach its fatal conclusion is just like that of Pallavi's: murdered in some public restroom, after the farewell intercourse (well, of course - it's for the show's encore). Rather common knowledge, or so I thought. Again, how tranquilised was she to not have seen it coming... I thought I heard Oprah Winfrey etc have a very large viewership in India - all the seculars surely watch (though I can't imagine who else would)?
Am going to make a little table of comparison between the hero and heroine of this latest romance - probably because I can't do such complicated sums in my head:
1. He's quite easy of mind with adultering. She was very willing to be the third wheel. (It's not entirely clear from the text, but it doesn't seem like she was asking to be Islamaniac's Wife No. 2 Of 4, but rather wanting her islamic all to herself without his 1st wife+kid tagging along at their party. Of course, I could be wrong: the angry muslimah wife's fury might merely have been about the prospect of a still/former kaffiri as co-wife, as other muslimahs before her have similarly vented, so who knows...)
2. She's a blackmailer - yeah, that sounds like Real Love to me. He's a murderer - that's even Realer Love - now going to jail. Hmmm, wait... I'm psyching that his 9-month old daughter wants him behind bars till the end and thinks he's a cowardly Loser for murdering people as his Solution to being haunted by consequences of his actions that he doesn't want to face.
3. He's an islamaniac. She's ueber secular.
Tally: How perfectly matched.
And while I'm complaining: why casually abort when it's not threatening her life and when she wasn't raped? In fact, since she imagines herself infatuated with her boyfriend, you'd have thought she'd think it was special enough to keep.
How about these teens-trapped-in-adult-bodies take responsibility for their actions for a change. Most people, when they reach a certain youngish age, realise the world *doesn't* in fact revolve around them. Then they start slightly considering how their actions affect others' lives now and again, and so try to not destroy the entire world in one go. (Even I have occasionally contemplated considering others - only contemplated, mind you; it usually ends in boredom.) But of course not these people and their 'earth-shattering' romance that they just have to tell the world about: "Angry married islamic boyfriend murders blackmailing secular infidel girlfriend in public toilet, after One Last Affair For Old Times' Sake."
Kkkkk....
What a horrid way to die. And what a waste of all the lives involved.
Absolutely none of this needed to have happened. If people just exercised their common sense once in a while.
Like I've always said (maybe not here?): there should be a ban on stupidity. And at the very least a tax on tastelessness (there's so much money to be made in that, I'm surprised no one thought to implement it yet).
Isn't anyone else tired of these childish and horrific Starcrossed Love Stories. Always some bad soap turning into a 2nd rate crime drama, with characters you can't remotely understand, that are so unreal and so people can't really care for. Why can't all the main actors commit quick-and-easy suicide in the first act itself, so we can be spared the predictable gory "denouement" already? Where's the remote control. I've watched this flick before, or all the ones it ripped off from (and they were all B-movies). There's only so much medeleven - what's that, compassion and sympathy? whatever - to go around: mine's very very very limited. I'd rather save the little I have for those innocent Congolese children who're getting stabbed and burned (or, if "lucky", abandoned) by the brutal christomaniacs like their jeebus-possessed parents, because of christianism=terrorism's false charges of witchery again. They didn't court danger. Life just dealt them a bad hand. Oh, and at least they're cute.