01-27-2005, 01:29 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-Sunder+Jan 26 2005, 06:12 AM-->QUOTE(Sunder @ Jan 26 2005, 06:12 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> <!--QuoteBegin-gangajal+Jan 26 2005, 05:09 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(gangajal @ Jan 26 2005, 05:09 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--> P.S. All I would like to say is that Brahman is both Saguna and Nirguna. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
to whom?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Brahman appears as saguna to a person who retains his ego while is experienced as Nriguna to a person who has lost his ego.
Sundar ji,
I did not bring in Sri Ramakrishna's position with the intention of arguing with you. I just wanted to state my position that Brahman being infinite must be both Saguna and Nirguna. Otherwise Brahman's infinitude will suffer.
to whom?
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Brahman appears as saguna to a person who retains his ego while is experienced as Nriguna to a person who has lost his ego.
Sundar ji,
I did not bring in Sri Ramakrishna's position with the intention of arguing with you. I just wanted to state my position that Brahman being infinite must be both Saguna and Nirguna. Otherwise Brahman's infinitude will suffer.