06-20-2009, 11:06 AM
[<span style='font-size:14pt;line-height:100%'><b>Bodhiji</b></span>,
The figures given by you may not be taken on there face value by the blind supporters of BJP in the forum, who can bring out another theory to defend the performance of the BJP at the polls.
However , from the figures quoted by you it is observed that the national average has been 58%. Therefore, it can be safely said that a voting figure of 50% and above should be considered as normal.If we agree to this figure than it appears that the voters turn out in MP, Uttera Khand, Delhi, Himachal should not be termed as poor. So it is not that in these States the former BJP supporters remained indoors. It may be that many of them have changed sides and ensured the victory of the Congress and the UPA.If they had stayed back en mass and not participated in the voting then the figures should have been much lower.
The figures given by you may not be taken on there face value by the blind supporters of BJP in the forum, who can bring out another theory to defend the performance of the BJP at the polls.
However , from the figures quoted by you it is observed that the national average has been 58%. Therefore, it can be safely said that a voting figure of 50% and above should be considered as normal.If we agree to this figure than it appears that the voters turn out in MP, Uttera Khand, Delhi, Himachal should not be termed as poor. So it is not that in these States the former BJP supporters remained indoors. It may be that many of them have changed sides and ensured the victory of the Congress and the UPA.If they had stayed back en mass and not participated in the voting then the figures should have been much lower.