Hindu Seer and related discussion only

[Sunder]

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->He is guilty in the eyes of GOD.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You now drag GOD into this case. and you are making an assertation that he indeed IS guilty in the eyes of GOD. All this talk without actually supporting your case with any reliable source.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->But, <b>I know</b> he did authorize it.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Please do provide us with your source. Were you present in the room when he allegedly said "avanai poi patthuttu vaa" ? Or were you the one he was talking to ? Are you closely involved with this case, or are eligible to be a witness? If so, then place your claims, and how you came to be convinced of his guilt. Else, you are naive, and are just buying in to propoganda.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Lifestyle of a Shankaracharya is exothermally difficult.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
To whom? Difficult in what way ? Samsara is difficult, but not sanyasa.. Thus, please refrain from commenting on how an Acharya should be, or what he should eat.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->This Bharathi teertha is GOD realized,you see an attendant around him always.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Now you bring in data that is totally useless to the point in discussion. We are talking about Kanchi Acharya, and how your conviction of his guilt. Realization or lifestyle is immaterial here. I seek to hear your foundation to the conviction.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Yo dont go about resolving Ayodhya dispute, Lord Rama cares less for Ayodhya Temple.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Please do not speak of what Rama cares for, and what he does not. Nor preach about what Rama's thoughts should be about Ayodhya.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->A Shankarachrya is a Treekala Gnani, he should have foreseen all these events and taken preventive actions.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Do not make up stuff as you like. Even without understanding the meaning of Trikaala Gnani, do not go about harping on the qualifications of an Acharya. All I asked you is to provide convincing proof (with source) that the Acharya is guilty.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Tamil Police are on a witch hunt, and seriously mishandled the investigation but that does not mean this man is not guilty.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This sentense is self contradictory, it makes no sense at all, and definitely leaves me thinking if I will ever get a straight reply from you.

thanks for your time Vajramunir.