<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Feb 21 2009, 10:07 AM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Feb 21 2009, 10:07 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-dhu+Feb 21 2009, 10:00 AM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(dhu @ Feb 21 2009, 10:00 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>Church's History in India: Dividing Hindus as Aryans and Dravidians to Rule Them</b>Â ( RM - video )
[right][snapback]94795[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->In a secondary title, they should make it <i>even</i> clearer by saying "Aryans (originally known by their biblical title of Japethites) and Dravidians (bible's Hamites)."
[right][snapback]94796[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Japeth is destined to expand at the cost of Ham while Shem is the doting or bumbling mediator or sepoy. This is the model. Even in slumdog, the Muslim is the favored intermediary and is delibeartely provoked against the Hindu untermenschen, while the colonizer's presence is only obliquely alluded to.
[right][snapback]94795[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->In a secondary title, they should make it <i>even</i> clearer by saying "Aryans (originally known by their biblical title of Japethites) and Dravidians (bible's Hamites)."
[right][snapback]94796[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Japeth is destined to expand at the cost of Ham while Shem is the doting or bumbling mediator or sepoy. This is the model. Even in slumdog, the Muslim is the favored intermediary and is delibeartely provoked against the Hindu untermenschen, while the colonizer's presence is only obliquely alluded to.