http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2009/02/dmk...hidambaram.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Sunday, February 08, 2009
<b>DMK on its way to destroy chidambaram temple</b>
feb 8th, 2009
this is one of the holiest temples in tamil nadu, and my personal favorite ever since i saw the brilliant aravindan film "chidambaram".
<b>my heart bleeds at the thought that the crypto-christists are about to destroy this.</b>
hindus are clearly second-class citizens, according to the constitution of india, which creates two classes: non-hindus (superior) and hindus (inferior). otherwise, the dmk should be taking over the velankanni temple (which incidentally is a hindu shrine to vel-ilang-kanni amman, swiped by christists). but the constitution supports the desecration of hindu shrines alone, not of semitic places.
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 2/08/2009 11:48:00 PM <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
About the comments: What a total loser the pretender calling itself "murali" is.
Give me your money and I will bet it is one of those cryptos famous for insinuating itself as a Hindu into Indian fora. I remember coming across a crypto christo in a Tamizh forum I used to read, which was calling itself PureAryan (or something) saying it was from 'North India' (who says that anyway) and then trying to insult Tamizh Hindus for their alleged Hamitism/Dravidoidism to the point where they got angry at N Indians in general. This was the entire intention of the crypto christo creep, of course.
The giveaway was that no Hindu would be saying "I'm Oryan, You Dravidoids. Watch My Superior Genes Invade And Take Your Wimmen. You Dravidiods Contributed Nuh-zing To Hindoo Kultur." Oh, then it repeated some particularly missionary statements about how Vedic religion is not Hindu religion and how Shiva is a Dravoodian God and Vishnu an Oryan God <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo--> Like any Hindu EVER says such inane things. Christos are such Losers, their loserness is only more testament to their religion and more embarrassment to mankind.
I wish Hindus would recognise such people for the infiltrating christoterrorists they obviously are.
Anyway, the pretender in this case - no doubt thinking to stoke trouble to deflect attention from Rajeev's blog having correctly identified crypto christians behind these latest anti-Hindu events - played the typical christoterrorist-donning-superficial-Hindu-exterior game again. This time, instead of playing some Oryan bat from the "Nor Nor of India" preying on Dravidian mice (as other christoinfiltrators have done), this twit plays a Vaishnava since the temple is Shaiva.
Like I said, give me your money IF. I am ready to place my bet on what this character is.
Ooooh, look more evidence of the christoism of the infiltrator, revealed by Nizhal:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>nizhal yoddha said...</b>
  i will not make any broad comments about tamil vaishnavites, because i have had good friends amongst them. but this fellow murali is either a troll or a creep. i have deleted several of his dumb/libelous comments here before.
  <b>and he totally endeared himself to me with his very first comment here wherein he decided what my caste was. what a jerk, i thought at the time.</b>
(Christos/DMK always ask such questions.)
  i don't know if there is a vaishnava problem per se, but this individual has a problem. we have a few like this who crop up from time to time. there was another fellow who made a few inane comments, and then threatened to never post here again if i said rude things about him! he was confusing me with somebody who cared a damn about his opinion. i am reaching the same point with this murali blighter. we have enough problems with the semites, don't need fratricidal warfare.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The problem with Hindus is that they are too trusting and not suspicious: they take people at their word. But if someone says they're Hindu and then abuses Hindu Dharma/Hindus/Hindu Gods, chances are *pretty* big they are not a Hindu. If someone says they're Hindu and stokes up trouble between Hindus, then again: not a Hindu.
This doesn't take brains to conclude. It just takes a little bit of experience and recognising the pattern. Christopattern of behaviour is always the same, even when the context and arguments they make is different.
A sentence in another's comment shows the conclusion is partly reached, but they didn't follow through with the implication:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I hate it when Hindus find new reasons to fight over each other..We have a great,very liberal religion that is accepting and welcoming.. <b>why bring in semitic thoughts into it and destroy it..</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Exactly, christoislami footprint is more proof of christoislamism.
The best way to respond to these twats is to never play into their hands by referring to them as Vaishnavas/Shaivas/N Indians/S Indians/Hindus. They *want* Hindus to make such an assumption. Christos have nothing to lose by getting Vaishnavas/Shaivas/N Indian Hindus/S Indian Hindus into trouble and then turning other Hindus aggressively against them. In fact, that is their whole game plan.
Instead, the correct response would be to tell the twat: "Get lost christo creep. Try your infiltrate-and-sow-dissent routine elsewhere." They can deny it all they want, but liars always put their foot in their mouth eventually. In fact, the easiest way to tell if it's a cretin writing something under a Hindu handle is if its comment left a bad taste in your mouth: whether it made you angry at what it said about Hindus/Hindu Dharma/Hindu Gods and whether the writing style/paras themselves were set up to make you angry. Retaliators will naturally be angry (they're trying to overcompensate for the christo's offence), but the <i>initiator</i> of the argument actually has no cause to instigate trouble unless it has an ulterior agenda.
Some christos try to be more 'clever': in order to retain their place longer/not be found out, they pretend to play along <i>mostly</i> and occasionally here and there make the strategic nasty remark and then immediately try to brush it off with some mild compliment/compromise. It's what one could describe as the Nip and Lick method: it first bites you and then licks the wound to confuse you and make you think it's a friend after all. No it's not. It's a terrorist. Kick it. Oh wait. Hindus aren't allowed to kick living things. Never mind. Kick it.
Hindus are dealing with christoism that's been on the aggressive subvert mode for some years now. The simple rule is to not automatically trust - autotrust is something Hindus are always inclined to do. But don't believe what people say they are. Instead, let their actions and words tell you what they are. They always slip, always make fatal errors and give themselves away. Sometimes they do it immediately. Sometimes it takes a little bit longer.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Sunday, February 08, 2009
<b>DMK on its way to destroy chidambaram temple</b>
feb 8th, 2009
this is one of the holiest temples in tamil nadu, and my personal favorite ever since i saw the brilliant aravindan film "chidambaram".
<b>my heart bleeds at the thought that the crypto-christists are about to destroy this.</b>
hindus are clearly second-class citizens, according to the constitution of india, which creates two classes: non-hindus (superior) and hindus (inferior). otherwise, the dmk should be taking over the velankanni temple (which incidentally is a hindu shrine to vel-ilang-kanni amman, swiped by christists). but the constitution supports the desecration of hindu shrines alone, not of semitic places.
Posted by nizhal yoddha at 2/08/2009 11:48:00 PM <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
About the comments: What a total loser the pretender calling itself "murali" is.
Give me your money and I will bet it is one of those cryptos famous for insinuating itself as a Hindu into Indian fora. I remember coming across a crypto christo in a Tamizh forum I used to read, which was calling itself PureAryan (or something) saying it was from 'North India' (who says that anyway) and then trying to insult Tamizh Hindus for their alleged Hamitism/Dravidoidism to the point where they got angry at N Indians in general. This was the entire intention of the crypto christo creep, of course.
The giveaway was that no Hindu would be saying "I'm Oryan, You Dravidoids. Watch My Superior Genes Invade And Take Your Wimmen. You Dravidiods Contributed Nuh-zing To Hindoo Kultur." Oh, then it repeated some particularly missionary statements about how Vedic religion is not Hindu religion and how Shiva is a Dravoodian God and Vishnu an Oryan God <!--emo&:blink:--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/blink.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='blink.gif' /><!--endemo--> Like any Hindu EVER says such inane things. Christos are such Losers, their loserness is only more testament to their religion and more embarrassment to mankind.
I wish Hindus would recognise such people for the infiltrating christoterrorists they obviously are.
Anyway, the pretender in this case - no doubt thinking to stoke trouble to deflect attention from Rajeev's blog having correctly identified crypto christians behind these latest anti-Hindu events - played the typical christoterrorist-donning-superficial-Hindu-exterior game again. This time, instead of playing some Oryan bat from the "Nor Nor of India" preying on Dravidian mice (as other christoinfiltrators have done), this twit plays a Vaishnava since the temple is Shaiva.
Like I said, give me your money IF. I am ready to place my bet on what this character is.
Ooooh, look more evidence of the christoism of the infiltrator, revealed by Nizhal:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>nizhal yoddha said...</b>
  i will not make any broad comments about tamil vaishnavites, because i have had good friends amongst them. but this fellow murali is either a troll or a creep. i have deleted several of his dumb/libelous comments here before.
  <b>and he totally endeared himself to me with his very first comment here wherein he decided what my caste was. what a jerk, i thought at the time.</b>
(Christos/DMK always ask such questions.)
  i don't know if there is a vaishnava problem per se, but this individual has a problem. we have a few like this who crop up from time to time. there was another fellow who made a few inane comments, and then threatened to never post here again if i said rude things about him! he was confusing me with somebody who cared a damn about his opinion. i am reaching the same point with this murali blighter. we have enough problems with the semites, don't need fratricidal warfare.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->The problem with Hindus is that they are too trusting and not suspicious: they take people at their word. But if someone says they're Hindu and then abuses Hindu Dharma/Hindus/Hindu Gods, chances are *pretty* big they are not a Hindu. If someone says they're Hindu and stokes up trouble between Hindus, then again: not a Hindu.
This doesn't take brains to conclude. It just takes a little bit of experience and recognising the pattern. Christopattern of behaviour is always the same, even when the context and arguments they make is different.
A sentence in another's comment shows the conclusion is partly reached, but they didn't follow through with the implication:
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I hate it when Hindus find new reasons to fight over each other..We have a great,very liberal religion that is accepting and welcoming.. <b>why bring in semitic thoughts into it and destroy it..</b><!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Exactly, christoislami footprint is more proof of christoislamism.
The best way to respond to these twats is to never play into their hands by referring to them as Vaishnavas/Shaivas/N Indians/S Indians/Hindus. They *want* Hindus to make such an assumption. Christos have nothing to lose by getting Vaishnavas/Shaivas/N Indian Hindus/S Indian Hindus into trouble and then turning other Hindus aggressively against them. In fact, that is their whole game plan.
Instead, the correct response would be to tell the twat: "Get lost christo creep. Try your infiltrate-and-sow-dissent routine elsewhere." They can deny it all they want, but liars always put their foot in their mouth eventually. In fact, the easiest way to tell if it's a cretin writing something under a Hindu handle is if its comment left a bad taste in your mouth: whether it made you angry at what it said about Hindus/Hindu Dharma/Hindu Gods and whether the writing style/paras themselves were set up to make you angry. Retaliators will naturally be angry (they're trying to overcompensate for the christo's offence), but the <i>initiator</i> of the argument actually has no cause to instigate trouble unless it has an ulterior agenda.
Some christos try to be more 'clever': in order to retain their place longer/not be found out, they pretend to play along <i>mostly</i> and occasionally here and there make the strategic nasty remark and then immediately try to brush it off with some mild compliment/compromise. It's what one could describe as the Nip and Lick method: it first bites you and then licks the wound to confuse you and make you think it's a friend after all. No it's not. It's a terrorist. Kick it. Oh wait. Hindus aren't allowed to kick living things. Never mind. Kick it.
Hindus are dealing with christoism that's been on the aggressive subvert mode for some years now. The simple rule is to not automatically trust - autotrust is something Hindus are always inclined to do. But don't believe what people say they are. Instead, let their actions and words tell you what they are. They always slip, always make fatal errors and give themselves away. Sometimes they do it immediately. Sometimes it takes a little bit longer.