Victory #3
http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?P...091&SKIN=B
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Good Sense "Dawns" in "Burqa" Dutt & Co!!- <b>Kudos to HJS !</b>
25/01/2009 03:32:11Â
<b>NDTV changed the decision to give Award to Hussain</b>
http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/6095.html
Jalgaon (Maharashtra): N.D.T.V. had planned to give âMan of the yearâ award to anti-Hindu painter M.F. Hussain who had painted nude pictures of Hindu Deities and Bharatmata. Due to the agitation by Hindu Janjagruti Samiti (HJS) opposing the plan to give the award to Hussain and the ban initiated by all the cable operators on all the programmes by N.D.T.V. it had to give the âMan of the yearâ award to Shri. Lalkrushna Adwani instead by changing their plan.
HJS had started the agitation to oppose the plan in order to stop the publicity of anti-Hindu painter Hussain planned by N.D.T.V. As soon as HJS had gaven a call to all the cable operators in Jalgao to ban N.D.T.V. all of them initiated the ban instantly by registering their protest.
Thereafter HJS had brought to the notice of the publishing media about this news by organising a press conference. Due to strong stand taken by all the cable operators against N.D.T.V, N.D.T.V. had to bow before the feelings of the proud Hindus. During award giving ceremony that had taken place on 23rd January i.e. yesterday N.D.T.V. had to give the award to BJP leader Shri. Lalkrushna Adwani instead.
The owner of âSai Visionâ and the councilor of the Jalgao Municipal Corporation, Shri. Ashwin Sonavne, BJP and the owner of âEkata Visionâ Shri. Shrad Tayade banned the telecast from N.D.T.V. instantly. <b>The private cable operators from places like Yawal, Faizpur, Amalner, Dharangao also supported the cause by stopping their telecast from N.D.T.V.</b>
In spite of the instruction from Shri. Pathak from N.D.T.V. to the private cable operators from Jalgao to start the telecast on telephone they did not pay any hid to it and continued with their ban firmly.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:clapping--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/clap.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='clap.gif' /><!--endemo--> The Hindus involved took action according to what way was open to them. (Like the awesome private cable operators who stopped the show.)
Who said that MF Hussein's what-<i>IS</i>-that-anyway is appreciated universally? All Dharmics see is more islamic junk. Since christoislamics are so appreciative of it ("freedom of speeeeech"), it becomes immediately clear that the otherwise-unidentifiable scratch marks he makes are all renderings of ayesha, mary, jesus and of course a cross-dressing-without-any-dress mohammed (and sometimes mohammed as a non-human simian of some sort) all committing the usual lewd and bestial christoislamic acts.
Hindu sensibilities are naturally offended as we don't like distasteful displays masquerading as 'art', <i>even</i> where the object of Hussein's base ridicule and that of his defenders is their own christoislamic religion.
HJS, which reproduced Hussein's images to warn its readers of MFH's depravity, should have another page where they label all his images properly as follows:
1. 6-year old Ayesha attacked by 50+ year old paedophile Mohammed-as-some-sort-of-monkey
2 & 3. Nude mary in blue, and nude mary as some kind of non-human deformity
These two were by christo FN Souza, not MFH - my mistake. They 'paint' in the same style, how was I to know.
4. Nude mohammed with obvious implants (wannabe cross-dressing). If you thought he looked ugly as a man-monkey in 1, he looks worse as a woman. Eewwww doesn't begin to describe it.
5. Mary and mohammed committing some act forbidden by the church (separation of centuries does not apply to non-existent characters) in full view of jeebus. Apparently it's a very graphic depiction. Think Team America.
6. Jeebus committing some sexual crime a la mohammed in 1. The less said about it the better.
7. Jehovallah in the nude and ... the rest is unmentionable in polite and impolite company and even in private.
When I saw the images I too got quite shocked by MFH's disgusting imagination. "Poor jeebusjehovallah and ayesha and mary," thought I. "Even if non-existent, they deserve better from their own faithful."
But apparently that's how their religion works: they're not allowed to depict these characters except in such offensive ways.
Still, I think Hindus ought to bring MFH to the attention of the Saudi Arabian wahabis: inform them of how MFH is making profane images of allah, mohammed and ayesha (and their other prophet jeebus). Their fatwas on MFH may prove lethal to him, but it is our bounden duty to convince the wahabis of how their gawd and propped-up-puppet - I mean prophet - are being insulted.
http://haindavakeralam.com/HKPage.aspx?P...091&SKIN=B
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Good Sense "Dawns" in "Burqa" Dutt & Co!!- <b>Kudos to HJS !</b>
25/01/2009 03:32:11Â
<b>NDTV changed the decision to give Award to Hussain</b>
http://www.hindujagruti.org/news/6095.html
Jalgaon (Maharashtra): N.D.T.V. had planned to give âMan of the yearâ award to anti-Hindu painter M.F. Hussain who had painted nude pictures of Hindu Deities and Bharatmata. Due to the agitation by Hindu Janjagruti Samiti (HJS) opposing the plan to give the award to Hussain and the ban initiated by all the cable operators on all the programmes by N.D.T.V. it had to give the âMan of the yearâ award to Shri. Lalkrushna Adwani instead by changing their plan.
HJS had started the agitation to oppose the plan in order to stop the publicity of anti-Hindu painter Hussain planned by N.D.T.V. As soon as HJS had gaven a call to all the cable operators in Jalgao to ban N.D.T.V. all of them initiated the ban instantly by registering their protest.
Thereafter HJS had brought to the notice of the publishing media about this news by organising a press conference. Due to strong stand taken by all the cable operators against N.D.T.V, N.D.T.V. had to bow before the feelings of the proud Hindus. During award giving ceremony that had taken place on 23rd January i.e. yesterday N.D.T.V. had to give the award to BJP leader Shri. Lalkrushna Adwani instead.
The owner of âSai Visionâ and the councilor of the Jalgao Municipal Corporation, Shri. Ashwin Sonavne, BJP and the owner of âEkata Visionâ Shri. Shrad Tayade banned the telecast from N.D.T.V. instantly. <b>The private cable operators from places like Yawal, Faizpur, Amalner, Dharangao also supported the cause by stopping their telecast from N.D.T.V.</b>
In spite of the instruction from Shri. Pathak from N.D.T.V. to the private cable operators from Jalgao to start the telecast on telephone they did not pay any hid to it and continued with their ban firmly.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> <!--emo&:clapping--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/clap.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='clap.gif' /><!--endemo--> The Hindus involved took action according to what way was open to them. (Like the awesome private cable operators who stopped the show.)
Who said that MF Hussein's what-<i>IS</i>-that-anyway is appreciated universally? All Dharmics see is more islamic junk. Since christoislamics are so appreciative of it ("freedom of speeeeech"), it becomes immediately clear that the otherwise-unidentifiable scratch marks he makes are all renderings of ayesha, mary, jesus and of course a cross-dressing-without-any-dress mohammed (and sometimes mohammed as a non-human simian of some sort) all committing the usual lewd and bestial christoislamic acts.
Hindu sensibilities are naturally offended as we don't like distasteful displays masquerading as 'art', <i>even</i> where the object of Hussein's base ridicule and that of his defenders is their own christoislamic religion.
HJS, which reproduced Hussein's images to warn its readers of MFH's depravity, should have another page where they label all his images properly as follows:
1. 6-year old Ayesha attacked by 50+ year old paedophile Mohammed-as-some-sort-of-monkey
2 & 3. Nude mary in blue, and nude mary as some kind of non-human deformity
These two were by christo FN Souza, not MFH - my mistake. They 'paint' in the same style, how was I to know.
4. Nude mohammed with obvious implants (wannabe cross-dressing). If you thought he looked ugly as a man-monkey in 1, he looks worse as a woman. Eewwww doesn't begin to describe it.
5. Mary and mohammed committing some act forbidden by the church (separation of centuries does not apply to non-existent characters) in full view of jeebus. Apparently it's a very graphic depiction. Think Team America.
6. Jeebus committing some sexual crime a la mohammed in 1. The less said about it the better.
7. Jehovallah in the nude and ... the rest is unmentionable in polite and impolite company and even in private.
When I saw the images I too got quite shocked by MFH's disgusting imagination. "Poor jeebusjehovallah and ayesha and mary," thought I. "Even if non-existent, they deserve better from their own faithful."
But apparently that's how their religion works: they're not allowed to depict these characters except in such offensive ways.
Still, I think Hindus ought to bring MFH to the attention of the Saudi Arabian wahabis: inform them of how MFH is making profane images of allah, mohammed and ayesha (and their other prophet jeebus). Their fatwas on MFH may prove lethal to him, but it is our bounden duty to convince the wahabis of how their gawd and propped-up-puppet - I mean prophet - are being insulted.
Death to traitors.