01-20-2009, 08:14 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Husky+Jan 20 2009, 02:54 PM-->QUOTE(Husky @ Jan 20 2009, 02:54 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin-Shambhu+Jan 19 2009, 09:43 PM--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Shambhu @ Jan 19 2009, 09:43 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->The thing that I see out of all this debate is this:
Some people like Brinda Karat, Mulayam Singh Yadav are Hindu, but patently muslim/christo in the way they treat Hindus. Thus we will have to list such people as "Hindu in name only".[right][snapback]93455[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->They are anti-Hindus definitely, whatever else they may be.
There's no such thing as "Hindus in name only", unless you meant people who still keep Hindu names though they are anti-Hindu. Mostly they tend to belong to a subcult of the christoislamicommuni persuasion.
[right][snapback]93477[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I know they are not Hindu, I said as much. But how are you going to say that in the list? You will end up saying each and every Hindu (who has not yet *formally* converted) on your list as anti-Hindu. Which, though true, will look odd to the new reader. So it is better to list their misdeeds (of all, christos and muslims included) rather than just list their religion next to them.
Confirmed christos with Hindu names can be listed as christos in brackets, Pronnoy Roy, for example; but all readers can make out religions by the name if names have been changed during conversion (Imam Bukhari, Samuel Reddy).
We should not look more rabid than we are, we will drive away people... <!--emo&:guitar--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/guitar.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='guitar.gif' /><!--endemo-->
Some people like Brinda Karat, Mulayam Singh Yadav are Hindu, but patently muslim/christo in the way they treat Hindus. Thus we will have to list such people as "Hindu in name only".[right][snapback]93455[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->They are anti-Hindus definitely, whatever else they may be.
There's no such thing as "Hindus in name only", unless you meant people who still keep Hindu names though they are anti-Hindu. Mostly they tend to belong to a subcult of the christoislamicommuni persuasion.
[right][snapback]93477[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I know they are not Hindu, I said as much. But how are you going to say that in the list? You will end up saying each and every Hindu (who has not yet *formally* converted) on your list as anti-Hindu. Which, though true, will look odd to the new reader. So it is better to list their misdeeds (of all, christos and muslims included) rather than just list their religion next to them.
Confirmed christos with Hindu names can be listed as christos in brackets, Pronnoy Roy, for example; but all readers can make out religions by the name if names have been changed during conversion (Imam Bukhari, Samuel Reddy).
We should not look more rabid than we are, we will drive away people... <!--emo&:guitar--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/guitar.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='guitar.gif' /><!--endemo-->