11-05-2008, 03:29 PM
http://rajeev2004.blogspot.com/2008/11/oba...in-kashmir.html
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>obama wants to interfere in kashmir</b>
nov 3rd, 2008
but naturally. it would help pakistan. why i am not in the least bit surprised.
need i spell it out for you? m-a-n-c-h-u... or a-t-l-a-n-t...
cold warriors ki jai! the blighters will be coming out of the woodwork in droves.
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Ba...-thesis/380615/
Barack Obama's Kashmir thesis!
C Raja Mohan
Posted: Nov 03, 2008 at 1431 hrs IST
Singapore, November 3: As Obamamania grips much of the world,
including India, the man who might become the next President of the
United States has ideas on Jammu and Kashmir that should cause some
concern to New Delhi.
Given its vastly improved relations with the United States and
Pakistan, India has no reason to press the panic button. Yet it should
be quickly flagging its concerns with the foreign policy team of
Senator Barack Obama, should he be declared the Forty-fourth President
of the United States on Tuesday night.
In an interview broadcast on MSNBC, Obama suggested that his
administration would encourage India to solve the Kashmir dispute with
Pakistan, so that Islamabad can better cooperate with the United
States on Afghanistan. Obama's definitive thesis comes in three parts.
... deleted<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2008/11/...nerve-in-india/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Monday, November 03, 2008
<b>Obama's Kashmir Comments</b>
Obama seems to have made some comments which indicate he might make India the scapegoat for the Taliban/AlQaeda problem. His comments imply that India has to be made more flexible on Kashmir, in order for the War on Terror to succeed. This is why I don't trust having Brzezinski lurking around in the background, whispering in Obama's ear. So now Pakistan's cooperation on terrorism -- or lack of it -- will be claimed to be a result of India's stance on Kashmir. I find this very worrying.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin--><b>obama wants to interfere in kashmir</b>
nov 3rd, 2008
but naturally. it would help pakistan. why i am not in the least bit surprised.
need i spell it out for you? m-a-n-c-h-u... or a-t-l-a-n-t...
cold warriors ki jai! the blighters will be coming out of the woodwork in droves.
http://www.expressindia.com/latest-news/Ba...-thesis/380615/
Barack Obama's Kashmir thesis!
C Raja Mohan
Posted: Nov 03, 2008 at 1431 hrs IST
Singapore, November 3: As Obamamania grips much of the world,
including India, the man who might become the next President of the
United States has ideas on Jammu and Kashmir that should cause some
concern to New Delhi.
Given its vastly improved relations with the United States and
Pakistan, India has no reason to press the panic button. Yet it should
be quickly flagging its concerns with the foreign policy team of
Senator Barack Obama, should he be declared the Forty-fourth President
of the United States on Tuesday night.
In an interview broadcast on MSNBC, Obama suggested that his
administration would encourage India to solve the Kashmir dispute with
Pakistan, so that Islamabad can better cooperate with the United
States on Afghanistan. Obama's definitive thesis comes in three parts.
... deleted<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
http://blogs.reuters.com/pakistan/2008/11/...nerve-in-india/
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Monday, November 03, 2008
<b>Obama's Kashmir Comments</b>
Obama seems to have made some comments which indicate he might make India the scapegoat for the Taliban/AlQaeda problem. His comments imply that India has to be made more flexible on Kashmir, in order for the War on Terror to succeed. This is why I don't trust having Brzezinski lurking around in the background, whispering in Obama's ear. So now Pakistan's cooperation on terrorism -- or lack of it -- will be claimed to be a result of India's stance on Kashmir. I find this very worrying.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->