Media In India/elsewhere -3

Husky · (This post was last modified: 10-30-2008, 03:09 PM by Husky.)

Unless otherwise linked, all the quoteblocks in this post are copied and pasted from
Hindu Wisdom's European Imperialism page, section Famines in British India: An enduring disaster of the Raj

Forgot to add to the colossal genocide-by-christoism figures already seen:
QUOTEAuthor John Newsinger is Senior Lecturer: History. School of Historical and Cultural Studies at the Bath Spa University, UK. He has written in his book, The Blood Never Dried: A People's History of the British Empire:
[...]
"the Bengal Famine of 1943-44.
[...]
The result was a terrible death toll from starvation and disease in 1943-44 that totaled more than 3.5 million men and women."Another 3.5 million just between 1943-1944. How many more did the vampiric christos of britain kill in the unreckoned christo-oppressed years? I know I keep asking this, but I think it's one of those things we ought to know.

Statement by Jabez Sunderland:
QUOTE"When the British first appeared on the scene, India was one of the richest countries of the world; indeed, it was her great riches that attracted the British to her shores. For 2,500 years before the British came on the scene and robbed her of her freedom, India was self-ruling and one of the most influential and illustrious nations of the world."

(The following Sunderland quote is found in Durant's Case for India, p.8)
âThis wealth,â says Sunderland was created by the Hindusâ vast and varied industries. Nearly every kind of manufacture or product known to the civilized world â nearly every kind of creation of Manâs brain and hand, existing anywhere, and prized either for its utility or beauty â had long, long been produced in India. India was a far greater industrial and manufacturing nation than any in Europe or than any other in Asia. Her textile goods â the fine products of her loom, in cotton, wool, linen, and silk â were famous over the civilized world; so were her exquisite jewelry and her precious stones, cut in every lovely form; so were her pottery, porcelains, ceramics of every kind, quality, color and beautiful shape; so were her fine works in metal â iron, steel, silver and gold. She had great architecture â equal in beauty to any in the world. She had great engineering works. She had great merchants, great business men, great bankers and financiers. Not only was she the greatest ship-building nation, but she had great commerce and trade by land and sea which extended to all known civilized countries. Such was the India which the British found when they came.Meanwhile lying christoterrorist Dinesh de Souza with his "Two hollers for christocolonialism" is praying to jeebus and probably his other idol, winston churchill, nightly.

QUOTEIn India a large number perished by British brutality and deliberate creation of famines, violation of persons bodies and dignity; in Palnad in Andhra, half of the population was said to be have perished every ten years, during several decades after the subjugation of the areas by Britain. It seems as if the intellectuals and leaders of Britain hated India, and felt outraged that in spite of all their brutalities, smashing of Indian institutions, high extortions, and tortures, men made famines and expropriation of Indian resources to the British state, and thus the all round breakdown of Indian society, the Indians on the whole, could not be wiped out that easily. "

(source: Despoliation and Defaming of India â By Dharampal published by Bharat Peetham, Wardha Other India Press, GoaÂ p. 1 - 17). Dharampal need not be so kind as to give them any benefit of the doubt by saying it "seemed as if" the christoterrorists of Britain hated India. Because they did.
About the famous Whine-stoned Churchboy:
QUOTEAmery was bemused by Churchill's âcurious hatred of India â and concluded that he was âreally not quite normal on the subjectâ. Indeed Amery was not sure âwhether on this subject of India he is really quite sane.â Provoked beyond endurance by Churchillâs bigotry, Amery, on one occasion, said: âI didnât see much difference between his outlook and Hitlerâsâ. Amery was not a liberal or progressive, but a hardnosed right wing imperialist. And it was not just to Amery that Churchill made his feelings clear.History lecturer John Newsinger still writing about the opinions of Hitler's Twin Churchill and the above mentioned "less hitlerian?" Amery on the Bengal famine:
QUOTEChurchill, âwho seemed to regard famine relief as âappeasementâ of the Congressâ. On one occasion when presented with details of the crisis in Bengal , Churchill commented, âon Indians breeding like rabbitsâ. As far as he was concerned âthe starvation of anyhow underfed Bengalis is less serious than sturdy Greeksâ, a sentiment with which Amery concurred.QUOTEIn February 1945 Churchill told his private secretary, Sir John Colville (1915-1987) that:
âthe Hindus were a foul raceâ¦and he wished Bert Harris (Air Marshall Bert "Bomber" Harris (1892 - 1984) could send some of his surplus bombers to destroy them.â Did Whinestone 'Hitler' Churchboy really imply he wanted us to retaliate and return the favour of his christoterrorism's genocides of:
- 25 million by famine 1800-1900
- ~8 million by famine in 1930
- 3.5 million in Bengal famine of 1943-1944
- 15,072,000 by christo-caused (Durant quote above) "plague introduced from abroad" and low immunity to influenza due to christo-caused malnutrition = 272,000 (1901) + 500,000 (1902) + 800,000 (1903) + 1,000,000 (1904) + ???? + 12,500,000 recorded deaths in 1918
(Again: What are the numbers before, between and after these years/periods?)

So, when we total that, limiting ourselves to counting JUST the christofamine-and-disease-related data provided by Durant and Gautier (which gives no clue as to what happened in the years not related by them), we come to:
at least 51,572,000 millions in India genocided by christobrits and their christoterrorism

In future, Hindus have to give that figure - making it completely clear that it is the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM established value - when whacking the crypto moles in our midst with the facts. (Be these MMS, Kandakaran Thapper or any other psecularly, 'progressively neutral' biblical twats.)

ADDED: And that's not even counting the outright massacres the genocidal christos from Britain perpetrated on Hindus, such as:
QUOTE(acharya @ Aug 30 2007, 03:37 AM)1857 mutiny revisited
India's secret history: 'A holocaust, one where millions disappeared...'
Author says British reprisals involved the killing of 10m, spread over 10 years

Friday August 24, 2007
The Guardian[right][snapback]72649[/snapback][/right]And then these figures on the reprisals to the Indian mutiny (an estimated 10 million) do not include other cases of butchery which the christoBrits in India perpetrated on Hindus at various other times of christocolonial rule (some examples of those can be found at http://hinduwisdom.info/European_Imperialism.htm)

Whenever anyone says anything remotely positive or even neutral about Whiney-Stoned-ChurchBoy, repeat how the Hitler of Britain (aka Winston Churchill) wanted to bomb Hindus to oblivion even after he and the faithful christoterrorists of his nation genocided 51.5 + 10 million Indians.
Make him more famous than he is. Go on, he - like the rest of his kind - deserves to be remembered forever for his "charitable, neighbourly, loving" christianism.

Flashback to 19th century again to commemorate more of that same "charitable, neighbourly, loving" christianism:
QUOTEWilliam Samuel Lilly, in his India and Its Problems writes as follows:
"During the first eighty years of the nineteenth century, 18,000,000 of people perished of famine. In one year alone -- the year when her late Majesty assumed the title of Empress -- 5,000,000 of the people in Southern India were starved to death. In the District of Bellary, with which I am personally acquainted, -- a region twice the size of Wales, -- one-fourth of the population perished in the famine of 1816-77.

Login




Remember me Lost Password?