<!--QuoteBegin-Harshvardan+Dec 27 2007, 10:28 PM-->QUOTE(Harshvardan @ Dec 27 2007, 10:28 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->SHAHI IMAM ISSUES FATWA AGAINST AROOSA
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Terming her stay with an âunrelated manâ as an âunforgivable sin,â the Imam called for her social boycott. The fatwa, a copy of which is with reads: âIt is a mortal sin for any woman to stay with an unrelated man. If a Muslim woman cannot even go to haj without her husband, brother or son, how can she stay with an unrelated man?â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This person does not have any legal authority to dictate what a muslim woman should do or should not do. This self-styled 'shahi imam' wants to be the next Taliban chief Mullah Omar.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Islam does not permit man-woman friendship. If a Muslim woman has illicit relations with a man, she should be lynched. âHad she been in Saudi Arabia, she would have been stoned by now,â said the Imam.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->This lunatic Imam should be prosecuted by law for calling for a murder of a woman.
[right][snapback]76495[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Harshvardan - not meaning to scare you with the unpleasantness of reality - but in various Arabian islamic countries muslim women marrying out of their religion is indeed a hanging offense <i>in practise</i> (not just in islamic theory). Back in the 90s I saw a documentary that was in part about this.
(And death-by-stoning is the islamic punishment accorded to adultery, though sometimes the women are hung for the same instead. In islam, being raped is also considered adultery - but various Iranian girls and women were hung not stoned-to-death for what happened to them.)
But I didn't know that muslims of India had started following the same. Probably the calls for death must be boldly going out in India nowadays because islamis feel confident that the country is slowly being turned into mooghalistan.
So yes, the imam is indeed a lunatic - but only because he is in fact following loony islam properly. We may protest that calling for her death is inhumane, but we can't argue that it is unislamic.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->This person does not have any legal authority to dictate what a muslim woman should do or should not do.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It is definitely against secular law.
But it is not against islamic law but rather in accordance with the same. In islamic law, islamis think they have jurisdiction over what their female population may and may not do and they think they have the right to punish them for such 'unpardonable crimes' like associating with a kaffir male or committing suspected adultery with a fellow islamic male. According to islami-theology they have the right to punish members of the ummah in this way. And their best friends in realising this humanly insupportable 'right' are the pseculars who will want the real law to appease the minority by letting them have their islamic way. Rather like how they have implemented the double-standard treatment of Tasleema Nasreen.
Today Nasreen is openly sidelined in psecular India, tomorrow's more psecular-than-ever India will facilitate the public hanging of a muslim woman who has any alliance with any non-muslim. (In the hoped-for mooghalistan there will be no kaffirs remaining, so pseculars need no longer have any worries.)
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Terming her stay with an âunrelated manâ as an âunforgivable sin,â the Imam called for her social boycott. The fatwa, a copy of which is with reads: âIt is a mortal sin for any woman to stay with an unrelated man. If a Muslim woman cannot even go to haj without her husband, brother or son, how can she stay with an unrelated man?â<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
This person does not have any legal authority to dictate what a muslim woman should do or should not do. This self-styled 'shahi imam' wants to be the next Taliban chief Mullah Omar.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->The Islam does not permit man-woman friendship. If a Muslim woman has illicit relations with a man, she should be lynched. âHad she been in Saudi Arabia, she would have been stoned by now,â said the Imam.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->This lunatic Imam should be prosecuted by law for calling for a murder of a woman.
[right][snapback]76495[/snapback][/right]<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->Harshvardan - not meaning to scare you with the unpleasantness of reality - but in various Arabian islamic countries muslim women marrying out of their religion is indeed a hanging offense <i>in practise</i> (not just in islamic theory). Back in the 90s I saw a documentary that was in part about this.
(And death-by-stoning is the islamic punishment accorded to adultery, though sometimes the women are hung for the same instead. In islam, being raped is also considered adultery - but various Iranian girls and women were hung not stoned-to-death for what happened to them.)
But I didn't know that muslims of India had started following the same. Probably the calls for death must be boldly going out in India nowadays because islamis feel confident that the country is slowly being turned into mooghalistan.
So yes, the imam is indeed a lunatic - but only because he is in fact following loony islam properly. We may protest that calling for her death is inhumane, but we can't argue that it is unislamic.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->This person does not have any legal authority to dictate what a muslim woman should do or should not do.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->It is definitely against secular law.
But it is not against islamic law but rather in accordance with the same. In islamic law, islamis think they have jurisdiction over what their female population may and may not do and they think they have the right to punish them for such 'unpardonable crimes' like associating with a kaffir male or committing suspected adultery with a fellow islamic male. According to islami-theology they have the right to punish members of the ummah in this way. And their best friends in realising this humanly insupportable 'right' are the pseculars who will want the real law to appease the minority by letting them have their islamic way. Rather like how they have implemented the double-standard treatment of Tasleema Nasreen.
Today Nasreen is openly sidelined in psecular India, tomorrow's more psecular-than-ever India will facilitate the public hanging of a muslim woman who has any alliance with any non-muslim. (In the hoped-for mooghalistan there will be no kaffirs remaining, so pseculars need no longer have any worries.)