Gujarat, HP, MP- Election 2007 - 3

[Guest]

Here comes gems from VHP
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->VHP has knives out for Modi, still
statesman.com
Dipankar Chakraborty
NEW DELHI, Dec. 24: Maintaining a rigid stand against the Gujarat chief minister, Mr Narendra Modi, the senior VHP leader,<b> Acharya Giriraj Kishore, today asserted that the BJP victory in the Assembly elections was a victory of “Hindutva” rather than “Moditva”. </b>

Speaking to The Statesman, Acharya Kishore, however, justified the VHP leader, <b>Mr Ashok Singhal’s visit to Gujarat to appeal to cadres. He said the visit was to ensure the victory of “Hindutva” rather than Mr Narendra Modi whom he described as “haatdharmi (arrogant person)”. “He (Ashok Singhal) was restless because he was convinced that the BJP’s defeat in Gujarat would be the defeat of Hindutva. (Modi ki parajay nahin hogi, Hindutva ki (parajay) hogi.) That was the reason why Mr Singhal went to Gujarat,” Acharya said. </b>

The VHP leader admitted there were differences within the Sangh and VHP on whether to support Mr Modi during the elections. <b>“By nature Mr Modi is haatdharmi. He cares two hoots about others’ viewpoints. But others in the Sangh want Mr Modi to heed their viewpoints as well,” the acharya said, adding, “Lekin mat-bhed ho sakta hai, koi man-bhed nahin hain. Yeh bhi swabhavik hain ke rajniti mein is prakar ka mat-bhed ho” (it’s only natural in politics to have differences of opinion). </b>
Acharya Kishore said it was likely that the differences of opinion within the Sangh, VHP and between them and Mr Modi could create problems for the organisation after the Gujarat elections.<b> He said the Parishad and VHP were determined to take corrective steps to contain the damage through “talks”. He said even after the Assembly elections there had not been any change in Mr Modi’s attitude. “He (Mr Modi) had been asserting that even if he was defeated ‘Moditva’ would win in the elections. Yeh abhiman ke baat hain. Yeh aur kam ho jayee to saara kuch thik ho jaayee,” he said. </b>

The VHP leader indicated that the Sangh would not hesitate to take action against Mr Modi if he continued to maintain his careless attitude towards the VHP and RSS. Asked to elaborate on the nature of action Mr Kishore declined to comment.
When asked if the RSS could summon Mr Modi here, Mr Giriraj Kishore said, “Abhi Sangh ne thora chora hua hain. Har aadmi ke prakriti hoti hain. Koi na koi shan hota hain jab woh thik hota hain. (we have given him a little leeway, but we will handle the situation in our own time.”

<b>Acharya Kishore perhaps for the first time publicly admitted that the VHP and the RSS had buried the hatchet with senior BJP leader, Mr L K Advani. He said Mr Advani had given his word that this time a ‘majestic’ Ram temple would be built in Ayodhya if the BJP and its NDA partners come back to power at the Centre. </b>He said the Sangh had nothing against Mr Advani despite his controversial remarks on Jinnah. Quizzed on the VHP’s Ram temple campaign Acharya Giriraj Kishore said, <b>“The temple would definitely be built. The Ram Sethu issue would once again awake people from slumber and the Ram temple would be built.”</b> He, however, ruled out any political involvement in the Ram Sethu movement. He said had there been no political involvement in the Ram temple campaign, it would have been ready by now. The VHP leader came out in defence of the VHP cadres in Gujarat who were recently accused of manhandling Christian missionaries in Ahmedabad. He said the local VHP leaders could not be blamed for the incident. He said if the missionaries try to convert people they would not be allowed to do so. He was critical of the UPA government’s alleged failure to protect Hindus in Pakistan, Bangladesh and Malaysia and demanded a more proactive role by the Centre.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
They are repeating Uma Bharati quotes. These should stay away from politics and do voluantary service. They should work towards building temple.