07-03-2004, 08:10 PM
Let us not try to find a fly in this ointment (dal mein kuch kala hain). This is the reason why employers prefer India (in addition to low wages). It all adds up to higher productivity on the part of the indian worker. IN case people think this is restricted to call centers, pl, be aware that HSBC has transferred all its back office operations to India (Visakhapatnam). So Indians are moving up the food chain and higher value add services.
HSBC praises Indians, angers UK unions
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->According to HSBC, one of the first banks to set up extensive back office operations in developing countries, those carrying out credit card, overdraft or other transactions make fewer mistakes than those who carry out the same functions in the UK. | Discuss: It's India's turn to dominate the world |
For every one million transactions processed overseas, eight mistakes are made, the bank said. In the UK, the ratio is 50 errors per one million transactions.
Rob O'Neill, a spokesperson for Unifi, said: "Our members will be furious that yet again, their skill, experience and dedication to customer service has been called into question by their employer."
HSBC stressed that mistakes were very rare in the UK and overseas, and pointed out that when looking at call centres, rather than transaction processing, the record was exactly the same, at one error in every 1,000 calls.
The bank said it had not released the data to show up its British workers but to demonstrate that the charge that overseas centres provided poor service was "empirically not true".
"It is utterly unfair to staff overseas to say that UK staff are correcting their mistakes," a spokesperson said.
The war of words is likely to escalate the hostility that already exists between HSBC and the unions. The bank has come in for heavy criticism over its policy to outsource jobs.
It announced the most far-reaching plans to date to transfer roles from the UK to Asia when it said last October that 4,000 jobs would go to India, China and Malaysia by the end of 2006.
HSBC, Britain's largest bank, which made almost seven-billion-pound profits last year, added two weeks ago that a further 3,500 jobs would be lost in Britain in back office functions, with 500 of those jobs being done overseas.
This will be partly counter-balanced by plans to add 1,000 employees in Britain in customer-facing positions in branches. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
HSBC praises Indians, angers UK unions
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->According to HSBC, one of the first banks to set up extensive back office operations in developing countries, those carrying out credit card, overdraft or other transactions make fewer mistakes than those who carry out the same functions in the UK. | Discuss: It's India's turn to dominate the world |
For every one million transactions processed overseas, eight mistakes are made, the bank said. In the UK, the ratio is 50 errors per one million transactions.
Rob O'Neill, a spokesperson for Unifi, said: "Our members will be furious that yet again, their skill, experience and dedication to customer service has been called into question by their employer."
HSBC stressed that mistakes were very rare in the UK and overseas, and pointed out that when looking at call centres, rather than transaction processing, the record was exactly the same, at one error in every 1,000 calls.
The bank said it had not released the data to show up its British workers but to demonstrate that the charge that overseas centres provided poor service was "empirically not true".
"It is utterly unfair to staff overseas to say that UK staff are correcting their mistakes," a spokesperson said.
The war of words is likely to escalate the hostility that already exists between HSBC and the unions. The bank has come in for heavy criticism over its policy to outsource jobs.
It announced the most far-reaching plans to date to transfer roles from the UK to Asia when it said last October that 4,000 jobs would go to India, China and Malaysia by the end of 2006.
HSBC, Britain's largest bank, which made almost seven-billion-pound profits last year, added two weeks ago that a further 3,500 jobs would be lost in Britain in back office functions, with 500 of those jobs being done overseas.
This will be partly counter-balanced by plans to add 1,000 employees in Britain in customer-facing positions in branches. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->