Dera Sucha Sauda -Sikh conflict in India

[Guest]

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->100 years from now, let's say if most Sikh youth give up wearing a turban and don’t strictly following Sikhism (at least the sort of strict Sikhism practiced by some elder Sikhs today), what are the chances of Sikhism still being around in 100 years from now? Won't Sikhism just slowly die out and disappear all together with the passage of time?
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

Allright!! sir ji!! let's watch and watch!!!! People have been saying this from the day one of Guru Nanak Dev and then when Khalsa was created.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Let's face it, one of the reasons Sikhism also flourished in the past was becoz Punjabi Brahmins made their first born son a Sikh and moreover, there were a lot of inter-caste marriages between Hindus and Sikhs.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

The Khatris, Rajputs and Brahmin Hindus and Sikhs married among themselves!!! and these communities raised their first born as Sikh.

majority of Sikhs who are Jats, Ramgarhias and Lubanas did not marry with Hindus or Muslims. Majority of Jats in Punjab are Sikhs. The Khatri Hindus and Sikhs were business class in punjab and exclusively in cities. Punjabi Brahmins (bhardwaj, agnihotri) are not even 1% of Sikhs and are mostly located in Hoshiarpur, Jalandhar (doab) area.

Badal, Amrinder, Vedanti, Tohra, Bhindrenwala, all Khalistani terrorists!! are all Punjabi Jutts. Bibi Jagir Kaur is from Lubana community.

<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Possibility of that happening in future are also very low now. You(Sikhs) are just shooting yourself in the foot if you 'bite the hand that feeds you'. So don't expect much largesse from Hindus in the future the same way you did in the past.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->

OK! sir if you say so!!! I agree that you should not feed the Sikhs!!!! Sikhs have become too lazy by getting used to the support from "Hindu" community. but It is my personal opinion that you are mistaken.