04-27-2007, 01:41 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->but they are most likely not marrying them because they are Hindus, they are marrying them because they want to continue having sex with them.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
That was a cheap shot even by your standards my friend and also a direct personal attack on another forum member.
3 assumptions in your statement: when you use the word 'continue' in your post you are assuming they are already having sex so would continue having sex after marriage. May I suggest you do not measure everyone by your standards i.e. simply because you did or are doing something doesn't mean everyone else is also doing or would exactly the same thing (a person having jaundice sees everyone with yellow eyes). No.2 Are you suggesting that you view marriage purely from the point of just having sex & nothing else? I thought marriage also meant amongst other things, mutual respect, caring & love for each other etc. And from what I know marriage also in Hindu tradition means coming together of two families i.e. boys and the girls family. Ok, even going for a minute by your convoluted logic, i.e. if according to you a person just marries for sex, why can't he have sex with someone from his own community? So most of us do not see marriage as simply a means to have sex as you do. And do I take it this is the typical reflection of the views of a person who claims to be a 'pure' Hindu about Hinduism?
Majority of members here on this forum I am sure would agree with me when I say that inter-caste marriages is a good sign as it indicates majority of Hindus have started seeing themselves first and foremost as Hindus and do not see themselves still as a member of so and so caste or belonging to this or that region of India.
Now instead of just being a arm chair critic how about contributing something positive on this thread for a change by letting us know what does 'Hindu narrative' mean to you? Sometime back I think you declared everything is available on the net these days so how about sharing all your knowledge about Hinduism with other forum members by looking it up on the net & posting it here?
Either you are attacking the posts of other members or now & then like a Mullah (who cries 'Islam khatray main hain') raising the similar cry about Hinduism & imploring the admins. to lock the thread. If I didn't know you better, I would have thought you are a non-Hindu pretending to be a Hindu trying your best to get this thread locked so the Hindu narrative does not come out at all.
Attacking posts of just one particular member now and again is a sign of insecurity and it gives an impression to others that you feel so much threatened by a particular member on this forum & his posts that you just target & are being critical about his views just for the sake of being criticalâ¦. No.2 there is a saying in the army âdonât create problems, give solutionsâ. So how about making some positive contributions to this thread for a change?
That was a cheap shot even by your standards my friend and also a direct personal attack on another forum member.
3 assumptions in your statement: when you use the word 'continue' in your post you are assuming they are already having sex so would continue having sex after marriage. May I suggest you do not measure everyone by your standards i.e. simply because you did or are doing something doesn't mean everyone else is also doing or would exactly the same thing (a person having jaundice sees everyone with yellow eyes). No.2 Are you suggesting that you view marriage purely from the point of just having sex & nothing else? I thought marriage also meant amongst other things, mutual respect, caring & love for each other etc. And from what I know marriage also in Hindu tradition means coming together of two families i.e. boys and the girls family. Ok, even going for a minute by your convoluted logic, i.e. if according to you a person just marries for sex, why can't he have sex with someone from his own community? So most of us do not see marriage as simply a means to have sex as you do. And do I take it this is the typical reflection of the views of a person who claims to be a 'pure' Hindu about Hinduism?
Majority of members here on this forum I am sure would agree with me when I say that inter-caste marriages is a good sign as it indicates majority of Hindus have started seeing themselves first and foremost as Hindus and do not see themselves still as a member of so and so caste or belonging to this or that region of India.
Now instead of just being a arm chair critic how about contributing something positive on this thread for a change by letting us know what does 'Hindu narrative' mean to you? Sometime back I think you declared everything is available on the net these days so how about sharing all your knowledge about Hinduism with other forum members by looking it up on the net & posting it here?
Either you are attacking the posts of other members or now & then like a Mullah (who cries 'Islam khatray main hain') raising the similar cry about Hinduism & imploring the admins. to lock the thread. If I didn't know you better, I would have thought you are a non-Hindu pretending to be a Hindu trying your best to get this thread locked so the Hindu narrative does not come out at all.
Attacking posts of just one particular member now and again is a sign of insecurity and it gives an impression to others that you feel so much threatened by a particular member on this forum & his posts that you just target & are being critical about his views just for the sake of being criticalâ¦. No.2 there is a saying in the army âdonât create problems, give solutionsâ. So how about making some positive contributions to this thread for a change?