04-23-2007, 03:09 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-k.ram+Apr 23 2007, 05:39 AM-->QUOTE(k.ram @ Apr 23 2007, 05:39 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->sedition; waging war against the government; attempting or conspiring to wage war; collecting arms with the intention of waging war; abetting mutiny; <b>promoting enmity between different religious</b>, racial, or linguistic groups; and causing criminal intimidation.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Reading yet another report on Human Rights in India, and it is about Anti-terrorism laws in india, and it has the above as in India's sedition act. The report is dated 2006.
[right][snapback]67692[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks for digging up this info. I will make a note of it.
It opens up the possibility for nailing at least one evangelist in a court of law for sedition, if he can be recorded as saying that Hindu beliefs and practices are wrong.
Even one single court case, won or lost, should set a precedent that gets some publicity against what is undoubtedly sedition against an Indian tradition of religious tolerance.
Reading yet another report on Human Rights in India, and it is about Anti-terrorism laws in india, and it has the above as in India's sedition act. The report is dated 2006.
[right][snapback]67692[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Thanks for digging up this info. I will make a note of it.
It opens up the possibility for nailing at least one evangelist in a court of law for sedition, if he can be recorded as saying that Hindu beliefs and practices are wrong.
Even one single court case, won or lost, should set a precedent that gets some publicity against what is undoubtedly sedition against an Indian tradition of religious tolerance.