Christian subversion and missionary activities -2

[acharya]

For Jesus to come back, it is necessary that he lived first, then secondly that he died, and lastly that he could or did come back to ‘life’. That is a lot of ‘ifs’ and absolutes that should generate more than just words of faith and on which we could exchange chapters of debate.

Josephus wrote one sentence mentioning the brother of Jesus some 60 years after the death of Christ. On the Roman side not a scribble. Nor is there anything said by the Hebrews. Where if you please is the evidence, notably concerning resurrection? Don’t you think that an event of such proportions would have left tons of written material by the historians of the times? Or is this Resurrection something of a metaphore?