A suspicion I had, that was growing until yesterday, has solidified. It concerns the conversion of non-Europeans to christianity (or islam) and the direct correlation (might as well say, direct relation) this has to the stagnation and failure of the converted society.
What I mean is this - and these are just loose thoughts not really fitting together properly, so I don't think I am explaining myself well:
Once converted, the converts actually absorb the christian belief they are Hamites and they play the role of the inferior, accursed Hamites whether they realise it or not. Look at the Phillipines, Asia's christian country. Has it contributed as many useful things as its population should be capable of? Historically it had its own culture and uniqueness of being, and who knows where it could be today if it were not a christianised country. There is no life in them now, they've been petrified as it were: they still look to have a culture and unique existence on first glance, but it's stonedead.
If you look at Africa, from the second or third generation christian converts onwards, people play the part prescribed to them too: that of the incontrollable Hamitic people who need intervention from outside to keep them at peace, else they will be at constant war with each other otherwise. But in reality, if you read about the Congo during colonialism, it has been shown that it was actually the christo colonials who brought all the strife to the various subcommunities of the Congo Basin. ( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm#Congo ) The same has been shown to be true for all African warfare, because they have their roots in the dissensions sown by christoislamism.
With those christo movies in Nigeria that portray ancient African religion as some kind of devilish witchcraft/crazed possession, it shows how the converted Nigerians think: they have imbibed the christo belief that for these hundreds of millennia Africans have been fools who have contributed nothing, have developed nothing; and that it is only now with christianity that the people have some semblance of humanity, stability or are worthy of/can progress.
I mean, who would even think such a thing of one's own ancient people, <i>ever</i> - unless they had been brainwashed by an intolerant doctrine to set aside all of their identity and see as completely worthless their entire history and their very being as a historic community? Only a christoislamic could come to such a conclusion that denounces many millennia of the creation of an ethnic, civilisational and religious identity. (Islam also believes in the myth of Noah's three sons Japheth, Shem and Ham, as confirmed by Alberuni http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=64265 )
Ethiopia is said to be one of the oldest christian countries in the world, Eritrea used to be a part of Ethiopia until recently. Now look what they are praying to: A red-headed Japhetic looking jeebus!
<img src='http://home.planet.nl/~hans.mebrat/eritrea17.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
(From http://home.planet.nl/~hans.mebrat/eritr...igions.htm )
At least Ethiopians are not pretending Jesus and his Apostles were African, unlike some liberation theologians are teaching Indians. Until jeebus came, they were unsaved nobodies. Their history, their true/only worthwhile history, they are convinced, starts with jeebus. What dhimmitude!
And they're okay with it. They're okay playing Ham - like so many other African, American, Pacific, Australian and Asian populations.
Ethiopians had never protested when the Pope during Fascist Mussolini had supported Italy's invasion of Ethiopia to bring those hell-bound schismatics (Orthodox Christian Ethopians), who were labouring under 'The Curse Of Ham', back to the original faith. The Ethiopians might consider protesting that Orthodoxy <i>was</i> the original faith, but not wish to deny that as Africans they're stuck with the Curse of Ham (after all, it's the only role available for all non-European, non-Middle Eastern people who wish to be christoislamic).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Then, in 1873, Pope Pius IX prayed for the
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"wretched Ethopians in Central Africa"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->that
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Almighty God may at length remove the curse of Cham from their hearts."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->(Cham is the same as Ham)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm )
And<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In 1935 Fascist Italy attacked and invaded Abyssinia. Since the population of Italy lacked enthusiasm for this agression, the pope hastened to declare a new crusade. For example the Archbishop of Tarent, holding a Holy Mass on a submarine, declared: "The war against Abyssinia should be viewed as a Holy War, as a crusade," which also opened "Ethiopia, the land of infidels and schismatics, to the Catholic Faith."
Link<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A7c.htm )
'Dravidian' is like Indo-European/Aryan. Dravidian means 'Hamitic Indian' (just like Indo-European/Aryan actually means Japhetic). So why would anyone who is not christian even accept this nonsense? Look at those brainwashed Indians in S India who actually believe they are Dravidians. They are willing to play the part of the oppressed Hamitic people who were conquered by some imaginary alien japhetites that brought them the only Indian civilisation recognised by the west. S Indians are willing to relinquish their claims to Hindu civilisation, their contributions to it, by taking on the role of 'Dravidian' - the most underwritten and worthless part ever - an idea that has seeped in through the 'secular' disguise that christianity occasionally wears.
Africa will not ever amount to anything - though it amounted to a lot in the past - unless its people avoid christoislamism. Because once converted, they think both their past and future is as failed Hamites. With such a defeatist attitude, their future will be a failure (though their past never was - that's all in their distorted chriso understanding of it). Then the only way that converted Africans will think they are on equal footing with Japhetic people is when they learn, also from the west/Japhetic teaching, that they've in recent times been given equal status by the church which has slowly been drawing christoislamic racism to a close. Converted Africans have to be told from outside that 'you're not inferior because you're darker, we realise that now' for them to know it for themselves.
Yet they don't realise they never had an inferiority complex before, that they always knew they were equals with any others and that this new Hamitic thinking is a recent development since when christoislamism made an appearance amongst them.
So it is in their capacity as Hamites that converted brown people all over the world become angry to have been discriminated against, to have been side-lined, to have been colonised (see Meera Nair's Vanity Fair where she makes the British characters do bollywood stuff; in an interview she gloated that this was somehow a payback to the british colonisers! Huh?), to have been neglected and victimised. Even in this, they can only ever think as the wronged Hamite who ought to have been treated as brothers. Because they are christoislamic they don't think from the POV of the wronged Ancient African or Indian or Phillipino or Australian Aborigine or Korean who insists theirs is an ancient and valid civilisational ethos which had been undermined by Europeans brainwashed by racist christo doctrines.
By thinking as a christo (hamite), subjugation will never end. Untermensch status will ever be their lot, because just by the process of conversion, the darker human makes a little covenant to forever think of himself as a descendant of Ham whose place in the bible's human hierarchy is well-known.
The only future that christoislamism ever promises African, Asian, and other unconverted 'hamitic' people is a prison from which they will never emerge as anything more than the Hamitic slaves. The part of Canaan's offspring is written right until doomsday and it will not change. If people want to be christian, they'll have to okay with playing the slave and untermensch forever. No sane person would choose that, but then, on conversion one loses all rational and critical thought. Rather than being impossible, it becomes natural to think that all of one's ancient history and identity (being completely interwined with one's Natural Religion as they are) was meaningless and worthless until christoislamism finally made you <i>someone</i>. To those thus stuck with Hamitic thinking, untermensch is better than being an unsaved nobody.
People talk of colonial subjugation and the after-effects that produce negative thinking in the colonised peoples. But they never think that christoislamism is a form of more violent and more complete colonisation: the Hamitic syndrome that does not even allow the victims to cling to their cherished (religio-cultural) identity and past. Having surgically separated the man from his being through the process of conversion, it merely plays into the christoislamic colonial/imperialist idea that others were and are savages and have always been incapable of anything on their own. And from the converted mindset (with its symptomatic Hamitic syndrome) the christianised/islamised people can never recover themselves, precisely because they have nothing to recover <i>into</i> (they already lost their original identity, sometimes they themselves trampled on it with a wish to kill it).
What I mean is this - and these are just loose thoughts not really fitting together properly, so I don't think I am explaining myself well:
Once converted, the converts actually absorb the christian belief they are Hamites and they play the role of the inferior, accursed Hamites whether they realise it or not. Look at the Phillipines, Asia's christian country. Has it contributed as many useful things as its population should be capable of? Historically it had its own culture and uniqueness of being, and who knows where it could be today if it were not a christianised country. There is no life in them now, they've been petrified as it were: they still look to have a culture and unique existence on first glance, but it's stonedead.
If you look at Africa, from the second or third generation christian converts onwards, people play the part prescribed to them too: that of the incontrollable Hamitic people who need intervention from outside to keep them at peace, else they will be at constant war with each other otherwise. But in reality, if you read about the Congo during colonialism, it has been shown that it was actually the christo colonials who brought all the strife to the various subcommunities of the Congo Basin. ( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm#Congo ) The same has been shown to be true for all African warfare, because they have their roots in the dissensions sown by christoislamism.
With those christo movies in Nigeria that portray ancient African religion as some kind of devilish witchcraft/crazed possession, it shows how the converted Nigerians think: they have imbibed the christo belief that for these hundreds of millennia Africans have been fools who have contributed nothing, have developed nothing; and that it is only now with christianity that the people have some semblance of humanity, stability or are worthy of/can progress.
I mean, who would even think such a thing of one's own ancient people, <i>ever</i> - unless they had been brainwashed by an intolerant doctrine to set aside all of their identity and see as completely worthless their entire history and their very being as a historic community? Only a christoislamic could come to such a conclusion that denounces many millennia of the creation of an ethnic, civilisational and religious identity. (Islam also believes in the myth of Noah's three sons Japheth, Shem and Ham, as confirmed by Alberuni http://www.india-forum.com/forums/index.ph...indpost&p=64265 )
Ethiopia is said to be one of the oldest christian countries in the world, Eritrea used to be a part of Ethiopia until recently. Now look what they are praying to: A red-headed Japhetic looking jeebus!
<img src='http://home.planet.nl/~hans.mebrat/eritrea17.jpg' border='0' alt='user posted image' />
(From http://home.planet.nl/~hans.mebrat/eritr...igions.htm )
At least Ethiopians are not pretending Jesus and his Apostles were African, unlike some liberation theologians are teaching Indians. Until jeebus came, they were unsaved nobodies. Their history, their true/only worthwhile history, they are convinced, starts with jeebus. What dhimmitude!
And they're okay with it. They're okay playing Ham - like so many other African, American, Pacific, Australian and Asian populations.
Ethiopians had never protested when the Pope during Fascist Mussolini had supported Italy's invasion of Ethiopia to bring those hell-bound schismatics (Orthodox Christian Ethopians), who were labouring under 'The Curse Of Ham', back to the original faith. The Ethiopians might consider protesting that Orthodoxy <i>was</i> the original faith, but not wish to deny that as Africans they're stuck with the Curse of Ham (after all, it's the only role available for all non-European, non-Middle Eastern people who wish to be christoislamic).
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->Then, in 1873, Pope Pius IX prayed for the
<!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"wretched Ethopians in Central Africa"<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->that
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Almighty God may at length remove the curse of Cham from their hearts."<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->(Cham is the same as Ham)<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A4b.htm )
And<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->In 1935 Fascist Italy attacked and invaded Abyssinia. Since the population of Italy lacked enthusiasm for this agression, the pope hastened to declare a new crusade. For example the Archbishop of Tarent, holding a Holy Mass on a submarine, declared: "The war against Abyssinia should be viewed as a Holy War, as a crusade," which also opened "Ethiopia, the land of infidels and schismatics, to the Catholic Faith."
Link<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->( http://freetruth.50webs.org/A7c.htm )
'Dravidian' is like Indo-European/Aryan. Dravidian means 'Hamitic Indian' (just like Indo-European/Aryan actually means Japhetic). So why would anyone who is not christian even accept this nonsense? Look at those brainwashed Indians in S India who actually believe they are Dravidians. They are willing to play the part of the oppressed Hamitic people who were conquered by some imaginary alien japhetites that brought them the only Indian civilisation recognised by the west. S Indians are willing to relinquish their claims to Hindu civilisation, their contributions to it, by taking on the role of 'Dravidian' - the most underwritten and worthless part ever - an idea that has seeped in through the 'secular' disguise that christianity occasionally wears.
Africa will not ever amount to anything - though it amounted to a lot in the past - unless its people avoid christoislamism. Because once converted, they think both their past and future is as failed Hamites. With such a defeatist attitude, their future will be a failure (though their past never was - that's all in their distorted chriso understanding of it). Then the only way that converted Africans will think they are on equal footing with Japhetic people is when they learn, also from the west/Japhetic teaching, that they've in recent times been given equal status by the church which has slowly been drawing christoislamic racism to a close. Converted Africans have to be told from outside that 'you're not inferior because you're darker, we realise that now' for them to know it for themselves.
Yet they don't realise they never had an inferiority complex before, that they always knew they were equals with any others and that this new Hamitic thinking is a recent development since when christoislamism made an appearance amongst them.
So it is in their capacity as Hamites that converted brown people all over the world become angry to have been discriminated against, to have been side-lined, to have been colonised (see Meera Nair's Vanity Fair where she makes the British characters do bollywood stuff; in an interview she gloated that this was somehow a payback to the british colonisers! Huh?), to have been neglected and victimised. Even in this, they can only ever think as the wronged Hamite who ought to have been treated as brothers. Because they are christoislamic they don't think from the POV of the wronged Ancient African or Indian or Phillipino or Australian Aborigine or Korean who insists theirs is an ancient and valid civilisational ethos which had been undermined by Europeans brainwashed by racist christo doctrines.
By thinking as a christo (hamite), subjugation will never end. Untermensch status will ever be their lot, because just by the process of conversion, the darker human makes a little covenant to forever think of himself as a descendant of Ham whose place in the bible's human hierarchy is well-known.
The only future that christoislamism ever promises African, Asian, and other unconverted 'hamitic' people is a prison from which they will never emerge as anything more than the Hamitic slaves. The part of Canaan's offspring is written right until doomsday and it will not change. If people want to be christian, they'll have to okay with playing the slave and untermensch forever. No sane person would choose that, but then, on conversion one loses all rational and critical thought. Rather than being impossible, it becomes natural to think that all of one's ancient history and identity (being completely interwined with one's Natural Religion as they are) was meaningless and worthless until christoislamism finally made you <i>someone</i>. To those thus stuck with Hamitic thinking, untermensch is better than being an unsaved nobody.
People talk of colonial subjugation and the after-effects that produce negative thinking in the colonised peoples. But they never think that christoislamism is a form of more violent and more complete colonisation: the Hamitic syndrome that does not even allow the victims to cling to their cherished (religio-cultural) identity and past. Having surgically separated the man from his being through the process of conversion, it merely plays into the christoislamic colonial/imperialist idea that others were and are savages and have always been incapable of anything on their own. And from the converted mindset (with its symptomatic Hamitic syndrome) the christianised/islamised people can never recover themselves, precisely because they have nothing to recover <i>into</i> (they already lost their original identity, sometimes they themselves trampled on it with a wish to kill it).