Why Was There No Tranfer Of Population?

[G.Subramaniam]

The seeds of Partition were laid in 1906
when hindus started the bengal reunification agitation
The british responded by raising muslims in army from 20% in 1900 to 36%
by 1930
The british also gave special weightages to muslims


The foolish gandhi's support of khilafat radicalised Indian muslims and set off a wave of rioting
Gandhi's Ahimsa also crippled hindus
Jinnah who stayed away from the khilafat campaign, saw that hindu society
could not handle muslim rioting
and used rioting to get pakistan

The pakistan Jinnah wanted was much larger than what he got
He called it mutlitated and moth eaten

Thanks to Savarkar, Master Tara Singh and Syama Prasad Mukerji for cutting
down pakistan size

In 1924, Lala lajpat Rai wanted partition on Radcliff line
In 1940, Dr.Ambedkar wanted partition on Radcliff line
In 1942, Rajaji wanted partition on Radcliff line
In 1946, Sardar Patel wanted partition on Radcliff line

If hindus had been more savvy, they could have grabbed a few more districts and
did the population exchange on the eastern frontier

Thats all

India escaped the fate of Yugoslavia and Lebanon and USSR where islamic reproduction led to disintegration and mass genocides

In hindsight, Dr.Ambedkar is correct
When the 13% muslims are causing so many problems, living with 30-36% muslims will be intolerable

Can you imagine living with an army 36% muslim ?

Even in residual India, muslim rioting post partition is much reduced
exactly as Dr.Ambedkar predicted

Islam forbids peaceful co-existence and Dr.Ambedkar saw the need to get rid of as many muslims as possible

The only way to keep muslims tame is a dictatorship
British, Sikh, Chinese or Russian or Singapore
Democracies cant handle islam


Any time an RSS nutcase laments over Akhand Bharat, I retort with
Akhand Islamistan