10-20-2006, 05:27 AM
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->When Buddhism was implanted in Central Asia, and Buddhist temples were built for worship of Buddha-statues, the Mazdeans described the enthusiasts of this Indian religion as but-parast, âBuddha-worshippersâ, as opposed to the Mazdean âtish-parast or âfire-worshippersâ. The term but-parast came to mean more generally âidol-worshipperâ, for by the time of the Muslim invasions, but had become the generic term for âidolâ, hence but-khana, âidol-templeâ, and but-shikan, âidol-breakerâ. They made no distinction between the different sects based in India, and by the time the persianized Arabs and Turks invaded India, the word but-parast was randomly applied to all Indian unbelievers. Seeing that the Brahmins had fire-ceremonies just like the Mazdeans, the Muslims occasionally included the Indian Pagans in the category âtish-parast as well, again without bothering about distinctions between different sects.
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Who is a Hindu?</b> - Koenraad Elst
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<b>Who is a Hindu?</b> - Koenraad Elst