08-30-2006, 08:59 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-digvijay+Aug 30 2006, 11:16 AM-->QUOTE(digvijay @ Aug 30 2006, 11:16 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->Ravi,
Nandibum cannot answer basic questions.
-Digvijay
[right][snapback]56469[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You must slow down
If you wish to participate and learn from a discussion , you must follow the thread scientifically and to its logical conclusion. Not throwup side threads contuniously
1. First we must deal with your misconception that Beveridge's original (1921)translation refers to Rana Sanga as a Rajput. It does not
Dilip Hiro's abridged version( 2006) is the only one that contains that, and we must logically conclude that he fabricated this information.
Why is another matter?
You have been misled by Hiro,. either that , or knowing that he has made a fabrication, you are wilfully misleading others.
Which is it?
Once we know where you stand on that question, I will be glad to discuss each and every matter that you bring up.
<b>
ON GROUPS.</b>[U]
Each group has their own viewpoint.
I cannot speak for other groups. Nandibum has explained that qute well.
I do not like closed groups, but they exist and have membership rules.
As Nandibum , has pointed out I am moderator for the Yahoo Jathistory group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/
All have been and are welcome to join.
I have extended that welcome to you before. You have not taken it up. Do take it up now if you wish. Indeed some your complaints are Jat specific , and that forum may be a better place for you to argue out your views, and clear up your ideas.
The group was formed in 2002 specifically to act as an archive for Jat History related material, and to clear up misconceptions both among the Jats and the NonJat community.
We have succeeded to some extent, and the material is increasingly being used by historians as reference material
The Yahoo jat history group should be treated just as a library.
The files section contain some online books, and as your interest in History grows, I hope you will find that of use.
As a result we have many members from across all communities. Many members of the Old Indian Civilization list are members, as are academics from all across the world.
The archives are public. The files section requires membership. That is a yahoo feature, for some reason. It is a drawback.
Membership requirement is only keep trolls and spammers out
Membership is only a click away, and approved for all. If trolls appear they are removed.
The only rules are, you must be courteous and professional, no four letter words.
Ravi Chaudhary
Nandibum cannot answer basic questions.
-Digvijay
[right][snapback]56469[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
You must slow down
If you wish to participate and learn from a discussion , you must follow the thread scientifically and to its logical conclusion. Not throwup side threads contuniously
1. First we must deal with your misconception that Beveridge's original (1921)translation refers to Rana Sanga as a Rajput. It does not
Dilip Hiro's abridged version( 2006) is the only one that contains that, and we must logically conclude that he fabricated this information.
Why is another matter?
You have been misled by Hiro,. either that , or knowing that he has made a fabrication, you are wilfully misleading others.
Which is it?
Once we know where you stand on that question, I will be glad to discuss each and every matter that you bring up.
<b>
ON GROUPS.</b>[U]
Each group has their own viewpoint.
I cannot speak for other groups. Nandibum has explained that qute well.
I do not like closed groups, but they exist and have membership rules.
As Nandibum , has pointed out I am moderator for the Yahoo Jathistory group
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/JatHistory/
All have been and are welcome to join.
I have extended that welcome to you before. You have not taken it up. Do take it up now if you wish. Indeed some your complaints are Jat specific , and that forum may be a better place for you to argue out your views, and clear up your ideas.
The group was formed in 2002 specifically to act as an archive for Jat History related material, and to clear up misconceptions both among the Jats and the NonJat community.
We have succeeded to some extent, and the material is increasingly being used by historians as reference material
The Yahoo jat history group should be treated just as a library.
The files section contain some online books, and as your interest in History grows, I hope you will find that of use.
As a result we have many members from across all communities. Many members of the Old Indian Civilization list are members, as are academics from all across the world.
The archives are public. The files section requires membership. That is a yahoo feature, for some reason. It is a drawback.
Membership requirement is only keep trolls and spammers out
Membership is only a click away, and approved for all. If trolls appear they are removed.
The only rules are, you must be courteous and professional, no four letter words.
Ravi Chaudhary