08-27-2006, 12:46 AM
Thanks the for a healthy environment.
Gulleria ji this time we will clear all your concepts and doubts about antiquity of jats and rajputs.
I just repeat what ever is said in link provided by you .
JATS ARE THE MOST ANCIENT RACE OF SINDH.
As we all know that AIT is just a myth,than it can be easily concluded that they are among the authors of Indus valley Civilization.
And we see a series of jat kings of morya kushan parthian sahi rulers balahara the greatest king of world from India of his times Harshwardhana anangpal tomar and others.
Wether they were jats or not we can have seprate discusion but as per muslim chronicles we can safely conclude that they were here many centuries before birth of prophet.right.
Now rajputs are called as gujjar parthihars or parthiars the parthva of indian texts who called them jats or ajats .
Now safely it can be concluded that rajputs took titles from gujjar and parthiar jats right or wrong?
Also as it is confirmed beyond doubt that jats are one of most ancient race how can you explain the existence of Gullaria clan of jats.
Is it not possible that when so many groups adopted rajput titles from bhars =chandels gujjars =bad gujars huns ,ahirs, meenas,meds, khatris=ghakkars,brahmans of HP,nepali ,bhihari and others Gullarias jats might have adopted rajput title.
Is it not a real possiblity when northwest was havily populated by jats so much so that arabs just called every one coming from India a Zott 'that jat ruling clans too might have adopted this title , When every other group was joining rajput group.The live rajputisation of brahman tribes of HP was even witnessed and reported by HA Rose and Ibbetson.
Tell me honestly that is it not a real possibility.If not why?
ie Gullaria rajputs of today may be Gullaria JATS of yesterday.
Again why rajputs were not there in chronicles earlier than tenth century.
I feel shying away from your true ancesstory and inventing some artficial past is some thing one should not be proud of.
Gulleria ji this time we will clear all your concepts and doubts about antiquity of jats and rajputs.
I just repeat what ever is said in link provided by you .
JATS ARE THE MOST ANCIENT RACE OF SINDH.
As we all know that AIT is just a myth,than it can be easily concluded that they are among the authors of Indus valley Civilization.
And we see a series of jat kings of morya kushan parthian sahi rulers balahara the greatest king of world from India of his times Harshwardhana anangpal tomar and others.
Wether they were jats or not we can have seprate discusion but as per muslim chronicles we can safely conclude that they were here many centuries before birth of prophet.right.
Now rajputs are called as gujjar parthihars or parthiars the parthva of indian texts who called them jats or ajats .
Now safely it can be concluded that rajputs took titles from gujjar and parthiar jats right or wrong?
Also as it is confirmed beyond doubt that jats are one of most ancient race how can you explain the existence of Gullaria clan of jats.
Is it not possible that when so many groups adopted rajput titles from bhars =chandels gujjars =bad gujars huns ,ahirs, meenas,meds, khatris=ghakkars,brahmans of HP,nepali ,bhihari and others Gullarias jats might have adopted rajput title.
Is it not a real possiblity when northwest was havily populated by jats so much so that arabs just called every one coming from India a Zott 'that jat ruling clans too might have adopted this title , When every other group was joining rajput group.The live rajputisation of brahman tribes of HP was even witnessed and reported by HA Rose and Ibbetson.
Tell me honestly that is it not a real possibility.If not why?
ie Gullaria rajputs of today may be Gullaria JATS of yesterday.
Again why rajputs were not there in chronicles earlier than tenth century.
I feel shying away from your true ancesstory and inventing some artficial past is some thing one should not be proud of.