08-21-2006, 12:02 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Mudy+Aug 21 2006, 07:28 AM-->QUOTE(Mudy @ Aug 21 2006, 07:28 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->brahman whit red hair are in fact germaic aryans .
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
rkumar/romani,
Have you seen or met any Brahman?
[right][snapback]55947[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Brahman have no form ,how can be seen?
If you refer to function call Brahman ,yes ,i have even a friend ,Brahman, from Himachal.
Are mentions in documents about Brahmans whit red hair.
I talk about white and some understend black.
I talk about sugar and some understend salt.
Seem you stil belive that im talking about AIT.
10000 bc -blonde gene existing in over 30-50% of population of Iran,India,Middle East,Central Asia,Spain,Ukraine etc.North of Europe the so call birth place of blonde gene was under the ice cap <!--emo&:eager--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/lmaosmiley.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='lmaosmiley.gif' /><!--endemo--> ;
4000Bc- blonde gene restricted at Central Asia,Europe,and sporadic(small groups)
in Middle east,India,Iran
1900 AD-blonde gene in north of Europe ,and sporadic in south Europe.
2300 AD -blonde gene sporadic in Finnland ,while totaly disapierd in all world.
The pro-AIT guys peak the situation existent in 1900AD and use it in their favour(because some groups fom Asia like sarmatians or tocharians have indeed yellow or red hair),while totaly ignoring the situation from 10000 BC and 4000BC.Also they made up the concept that dravidians are in fact africans(and north indian non-africans) base also on some superficial similarites like skin color and of course base on a huge ignorance.
Their succes was so big that even indians cant belive that India and Central Asia can be the place of birth for the yellow hair gene .
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
rkumar/romani,
Have you seen or met any Brahman?
[right][snapback]55947[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Brahman have no form ,how can be seen?
If you refer to function call Brahman ,yes ,i have even a friend ,Brahman, from Himachal.
Are mentions in documents about Brahmans whit red hair.
I talk about white and some understend black.
I talk about sugar and some understend salt.
Seem you stil belive that im talking about AIT.
10000 bc -blonde gene existing in over 30-50% of population of Iran,India,Middle East,Central Asia,Spain,Ukraine etc.North of Europe the so call birth place of blonde gene was under the ice cap <!--emo&:eager--><img src='style_emoticons/<#EMO_DIR#>/lmaosmiley.gif' border='0' style='vertical-align:middle' alt='lmaosmiley.gif' /><!--endemo--> ;
4000Bc- blonde gene restricted at Central Asia,Europe,and sporadic(small groups)
in Middle east,India,Iran
1900 AD-blonde gene in north of Europe ,and sporadic in south Europe.
2300 AD -blonde gene sporadic in Finnland ,while totaly disapierd in all world.
The pro-AIT guys peak the situation existent in 1900AD and use it in their favour(because some groups fom Asia like sarmatians or tocharians have indeed yellow or red hair),while totaly ignoring the situation from 10000 BC and 4000BC.Also they made up the concept that dravidians are in fact africans(and north indian non-africans) base also on some superficial similarites like skin color and of course base on a huge ignorance.
Their succes was so big that even indians cant belive that India and Central Asia can be the place of birth for the yellow hair gene .