08-12-2006, 09:27 AM
It would be better to deport them to Africa or the middle east. Africa will have a lot of room with the population decline from AIDS.
<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Aug 12 2006, 08:28 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Aug 12 2006, 08:28 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I was under the impression that most Kashmiris were of Indian ancestry, the usual enforced conversion to Islam. I read somewhere that Indian, Pak and Bd Muslims have 90% or more Indian ancestry. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes majority are of Indian ancestry, not foreign, the foreign influence is more in evidence in POK, NWFP etc but all that doesn't matter, all of them need to be reconverted or else Hindus will have to face some unpleasent consequences.
[right][snapback]55524[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->
<!--QuoteBegin-Bharatvarsh+Aug 12 2006, 08:28 AM-->QUOTE(Bharatvarsh @ Aug 12 2006, 08:28 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin--><!--QuoteBegin--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->I was under the impression that most Kashmiris were of Indian ancestry, the usual enforced conversion to Islam. I read somewhere that Indian, Pak and Bd Muslims have 90% or more Indian ancestry. <!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
Yes majority are of Indian ancestry, not foreign, the foreign influence is more in evidence in POK, NWFP etc but all that doesn't matter, all of them need to be reconverted or else Hindus will have to face some unpleasent consequences.
[right][snapback]55524[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--></div><!--QuoteEEnd-->