<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->i would love to see proof of how tamil comes from sanskrit. same with munda.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->South Indian languages and Munda are not shown to be derived from Samskrit. Hence not classified as Indo-Aryan. What do S Indian or Munda languages have to do with this discussion at all?
I get it, you're being pedantic about my statement <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If I understand it correctly, this new division puts the <b>Indian</b>, Iranian, Armenian and Greek languages together in one group<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> where I wrote 'Indian' as a shorthand for 'Indo-Aryan', thinking that the person I was writing to - that is dhu, not you - would understand that I meant the Indo-Aryan languages. These were the only Indian languages that were in question here; S Indian or Munda were not brought up at all in any of the recent posts I think.
But here, I'll correct it for you:<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If I understand it correctly, this new division puts the <b>Indo-Aryan</b> languages, Iranian languages, Armenian and Greek languages together in one group<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I get it, you're being pedantic about my statement <!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If I understand it correctly, this new division puts the <b>Indian</b>, Iranian, Armenian and Greek languages together in one group<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd--> where I wrote 'Indian' as a shorthand for 'Indo-Aryan', thinking that the person I was writing to - that is dhu, not you - would understand that I meant the Indo-Aryan languages. These were the only Indian languages that were in question here; S Indian or Munda were not brought up at all in any of the recent posts I think.
But here, I'll correct it for you:<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->If I understand it correctly, this new division puts the <b>Indo-Aryan</b> languages, Iranian languages, Armenian and Greek languages together in one group<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->