Post 31 (LSrini):
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->some muslim in the article asks why are the naxals and NE terrorists not called "Hindu terrorists" but the kashmir ones are called islamic.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Correct me if I'm wrong, aren't naxals communists? And NE terrorists are Christian. That would make both groups anti-Hindu. Muslims even in India must have a very low IQ if they feel the need to ask such questions.
Besides, the Kashmiri terrorists are Islamic. Their groups have Muslim names, they shout Muslim slogans, they train in Islamic brainwashing 'schools' (madrasas), their demands are made in the name of Islam and Allah, and finally, they're all made up of Muslims - not communists, not Christians (who've already got terrorism covered in the NE) and not Hindus.
<!--QuoteBegin-->QUOTE<!--QuoteEBegin-->some muslim in the article asks why are the naxals and NE terrorists not called "Hindu terrorists" but the kashmir ones are called islamic.<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->Correct me if I'm wrong, aren't naxals communists? And NE terrorists are Christian. That would make both groups anti-Hindu. Muslims even in India must have a very low IQ if they feel the need to ask such questions.
Besides, the Kashmiri terrorists are Islamic. Their groups have Muslim names, they shout Muslim slogans, they train in Islamic brainwashing 'schools' (madrasas), their demands are made in the name of Islam and Allah, and finally, they're all made up of Muslims - not communists, not Christians (who've already got terrorism covered in the NE) and not Hindus.