05-16-2006, 07:13 PM
Come on guys ....
Jats are no foreginers they are Indians and don't hate them when they try to present their point of view when jatt history is being discussed on Indian discussion forum.
I don't need to remind you the jat regiment the sikh regiment and a part of rajput regiment is filled with those jatt soldiers who are shedding their blood for their motherland.
Try to prove your version of jatt history if you think their version is wrong.
We must concentrate on substance not on invectives.
We can't deny the facts that these muslim historians seems to mention more of jats in their early enconter with Indian people.
I request Delete not to indulge in indidual cases but concentrate on jat history as the thread suggests.
Jats are no foreginers they are Indians and don't hate them when they try to present their point of view when jatt history is being discussed on Indian discussion forum.
I don't need to remind you the jat regiment the sikh regiment and a part of rajput regiment is filled with those jatt soldiers who are shedding their blood for their motherland.
Try to prove your version of jatt history if you think their version is wrong.
We must concentrate on substance not on invectives.
We can't deny the facts that these muslim historians seems to mention more of jats in their early enconter with Indian people.
I request Delete not to indulge in indidual cases but concentrate on jat history as the thread suggests.