03-03-2006, 12:45 PM
RADHE KRISHNA SRI CARL. ALTHOUGH THE STYLE OF UR CONVEYING THINGS HAS SOFTENED, THE SELF STYLED JARGONS U R USING ARE STILL OFFENSIVE.
I AGREE TO THE FACT THAT THOSE WHO FOLLOW ISCKON ARE SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY THEIR GURU. BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT UR GURU IS BONAFIDE AND A GURU EVEN IF HE IS ADVOCATING SOMETHING DIFFERENT IS MALAFIDE.
I APPRECIATE THAT U DONT DISRESPECT SHANKARACHARYA. BUT ENTER ANY SITE OF ISCKON. I AM SO SORRY TO SAY THAT THESE ARE LITTERED WITH ABUSES OF THIS GREAT SAINT OF INDIA. PEOPLE WHO ARE NON ENTITIES ARE HEAPING ABUSES ON SHANKARACHARYA IN UR SITES.
U DONT AGREE WITH ADVAITA IS ONE THING. SAY THAT U DONT AGREE WITH ADVAITA. BE SINCERE. DONT GIVE A CONCOCTED NAME TO A GREAT PHILOSOPHY LIKE "MAYAVADA" AND GO ON DISPROVING IT. FOR U R DISPROVING MAYAVADA AND NOT ADVAITA.
FOR UR KIND INFORMATION, WHENEVER PEOPLE SAY A PERSON HAS DEFEATED ANOTHER IDEOLOGY, PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY, THAT WHAT IS DEFEATED IS THE CAPACITY OF ARGUMENT OF ANOTHER PERSON AND NOT THE IDEOLOGY OF ALTOGETHER.
IN THE PAST SO MANY ACHARYAS BELONGING TO SO MANY IDEOLOGIES HAVE DEFEATED OPPONENT IDEOLOGISTS. BUT NOT THE OPPONENT IDEOLOGY.
TO SAY ADVAITA AS "MAYAVADA" IS AS DEROGATORY AS REFERRING "SHRI KRISHNA BALARAMA MANDIR" IN BRINDAVAN AS "ANGREZI MANDIR".
LET US BE HONEST IN OUR APPROACH .
THAT IS WHAT IS TAUGHT BY CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU.
I AGREE TO THE FACT THAT THOSE WHO FOLLOW ISCKON ARE SUPPOSED TO FOLLOW THE DIRECTIONS GIVEN BY THEIR GURU. BUT IT DOES NOT MEAN THAT UR GURU IS BONAFIDE AND A GURU EVEN IF HE IS ADVOCATING SOMETHING DIFFERENT IS MALAFIDE.
I APPRECIATE THAT U DONT DISRESPECT SHANKARACHARYA. BUT ENTER ANY SITE OF ISCKON. I AM SO SORRY TO SAY THAT THESE ARE LITTERED WITH ABUSES OF THIS GREAT SAINT OF INDIA. PEOPLE WHO ARE NON ENTITIES ARE HEAPING ABUSES ON SHANKARACHARYA IN UR SITES.
U DONT AGREE WITH ADVAITA IS ONE THING. SAY THAT U DONT AGREE WITH ADVAITA. BE SINCERE. DONT GIVE A CONCOCTED NAME TO A GREAT PHILOSOPHY LIKE "MAYAVADA" AND GO ON DISPROVING IT. FOR U R DISPROVING MAYAVADA AND NOT ADVAITA.
FOR UR KIND INFORMATION, WHENEVER PEOPLE SAY A PERSON HAS DEFEATED ANOTHER IDEOLOGY, PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY, THAT WHAT IS DEFEATED IS THE CAPACITY OF ARGUMENT OF ANOTHER PERSON AND NOT THE IDEOLOGY OF ALTOGETHER.
IN THE PAST SO MANY ACHARYAS BELONGING TO SO MANY IDEOLOGIES HAVE DEFEATED OPPONENT IDEOLOGISTS. BUT NOT THE OPPONENT IDEOLOGY.
TO SAY ADVAITA AS "MAYAVADA" IS AS DEROGATORY AS REFERRING "SHRI KRISHNA BALARAMA MANDIR" IN BRINDAVAN AS "ANGREZI MANDIR".
LET US BE HONEST IN OUR APPROACH .
THAT IS WHAT IS TAUGHT BY CHAITANYA MAHAPRABHU.