01-07-2006, 01:10 PM
<!--QuoteBegin-Shaurya+Jan 7 2006, 02:04 AM-->QUOTE(Shaurya @ Jan 7 2006, 02:04 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->I completely disagree with the proposed representation solution, purely by majority only. The concept of federalism would be completely lost. Not to mention this will not be progress but regress in democracy as that small party in Manipur will not have a say and will lead to dis illussionment very quickly. My view is the number of parties in parliamnet is not the key issue, in fact it is a benefit. The problem is becuase in our system the executive is derived from the legislature there is a link between parties and governance. If we can get the executive to be formed from outside the legislature (like the Presidential system) then the number of parties in Parliament ceases to be an issue.
<b>
Presidential system of govt and reforms thread merged into one. - Admin</b>
[right][snapback]44404[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree with this opinion completely. We have the executive that comes out of legislaure and controls legislature, judiciary with appointments, favoritism. Basically we have a vested group (coterie) or a person who weild enormous power who distribute tickets and who have no concept of seperation of powers between legislature and executive or even judiciary. The presidential form pits legislature against the executive and it is good.
<b>
Presidential system of govt and reforms thread merged into one. - Admin</b>
[right][snapback]44404[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->
I agree with this opinion completely. We have the executive that comes out of legislaure and controls legislature, judiciary with appointments, favoritism. Basically we have a vested group (coterie) or a person who weild enormous power who distribute tickets and who have no concept of seperation of powers between legislature and executive or even judiciary. The presidential form pits legislature against the executive and it is good.