11-03-2005, 09:25 PM
That being said I don't agree with Guleriaji's denigration of Jats, most communities collaborated to some degree with Muslims and there were many from the same community who resisted the invaders till their last breath, Gokul Jat was hacked to death piece by piece for refusing to become a Muslim but where I object is the garbage about historians being biased only against Jats, till now the control of history writing has been in the hands of anti hindu communists who as Guleriaji said did not have anything good to say about any predominantly Hindu community, for example why would Irfan Habib write about Gokul Jat when he tries to cover up Muslim intolerance and even tries to make out Aurangzeb as secular, writing about Gokul Jat would only prove something that he wants to cover up so he doesn't write about him (so its not because Gokul is a Jat that he is not very well known), its because those who control history writing in India want to cover up any resistance put by any Hindu community against the invaders and if Jats are part of this resistance they will also cover up Jat resistance along with the resistance of other Hindus.