False Histories-saka/kushana Debate

[Guest]

Guleria, you should learn something about art of agruing. There are two aspect, rhetoric(subjetive persuation) and dialectic(objective proofs). Your account of cruelity of poor farmers doesn't prove what we are discussing. It shows your mentality and hatred. If you talk of such things, you want me to list all things that were perpetuated on RAjputs, sikhs and Jats by musilm. You want me to give gory details about how Sikhs were treated by muslims in times of Teg bahadur. By giving a particular incident I can't conclude that Sikhs were not powerful enuf to charge back, they did and uprooted Afgans from Panjab. We had common enemy but its saddening to see people like you haven't learned anything about unity.

Som

<!--QuoteBegin-PC Guleria+Nov 3 2005, 01:59 PM-->QUOTE(PC Guleria @ Nov 3 2005, 01:59 PM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->In the reign of Ala-ud-din Khalji the historian Barani writes: "The people were brought to such a state of obedience that one revenue officer would string together twelve khuts, muqaddams, and <b>chaudharies</b> together by the neck and enforce payment by blows." These Jat village headmen were so impoverished that they could not afford to buy horses or weapons; and their wives had to serve as maid-servants in the houses of Muslims to make a living.

This is your wonderful Jat resistance? A few dandas from the Turks and you grovel before them and pay revenue while your women have to become maid-servants?
[right][snapback]40564[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->