False Histories-saka/kushana Debate

[Guest]

Again I had to respond. Guleriaji, you are mistaken. I spent some time in Jatland, they have pretty good account of history, no body enjoys to believe that they are from outside.... in academic debate you must consider all the evidences and analyse properly... its not wise to believe in what you like... if there are some evidences that these tribes came from outside, it shd be analysed properly rather than trashing the idea.... of course every clan should be proud of itself. RAjputs, Jats, Sikhs all have glorious history... About dalistan.com, its propaganda... totally rubbish... there are other website that claim Rajputs and Jats came from outside...
Everybody knows politics behind AIT and Indo-schythian theory...

-Som

<!--QuoteBegin-Rising+Oct 3 2005, 05:28 AM-->QUOTE(Rising @ Oct 3 2005, 05:28 AM)<!--QuoteEBegin-->"Rising,

Could you please share the arguments (possibly with links) and how you rip them apart?

Thanks "

Sure.  The following websites r some of the worst propagaters of this shaka/kushan rubbish. 
   www.jatland.com         www.jattworld.com               www.dalitstan.com
   www.jatt.com               yahoo jat history group   
The above are just a small example.  There are many more websites, running into their hundreds claiming jats/rajputs/gujars r descended from foreign tribes.

Now, u may ask why we should be bothered about such claims.  Ok.  First of all, most of these claims were first talked about by the british colonialists.  No one had ever before them even mentined shaka's or kushan's developing into todays jats or rajputs.  Secondly, the theory was developed to divide Indians. 
The above are just some of the common sense points that i use when debating with these fanatical colonial theory propagating jats such as ravi chaudry on jat land.
[right][snapback]38986[/snapback][/right]
<!--QuoteEnd--><!--QuoteEEnd-->