11-24-2003, 01:34 AM
Regarding Sangh Parivar
---------------------
If you consider that hindu society is besieged and facing total war
sangh parivar performs a role which I term civil defense
a very critical and important role, but much different from an army
The psecs paint sangh parivar as a militant organisation mainly to fool hindus
to think they have a protector and they can rest at ease
At no point does sangh parivar claim to have a paramilitary force
Per Guru Golwalker and many other hindu scholars, hindu society faces attacks
from 3 fronts
Islam, missionary minded xtians ( as opposed to normal xtians ), and commies
All 3 of them aim to detach the weakest link in hindu society, namely Dalits and tribals
The composition of India is as follows
Muslims 13%
Xtians 3%
Dalits 16%
Tribals 8%
Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists 3%
OBC 43%
Upper Caste 14%
The main thrust of sangh parivar is to integrate the weaker sections into hindu society. They have several anti-casteist fronts and incidents of casteism have come down drastically, while of course there is still much ground to cover
Tribals are also being integrated into a honorable place in hindu society
Sangh parivar has many senior Dalit and tribal leaders
Sewa activities are critical since this prevents inroads of petro-dollars, church dollars and naxalism
If you look at the naxalite movement, they have a tactical alliance with islamists and missionaries. The Nepal maoists have banned sanskrit and enforced beef eating in their areas
The VHP for instance is not a pure sangh parivar front, it has some members from sangh parivar and some from religious leaders
Thanks to inputs from sangh parivar, many of the independent religious leaders have started anti-casteism and sewa work
This is foundation level work, in raising awareness and creating a will to resist
and creating cohesion in hindu society
Resistance to muslim rioters actually comes from pre-existing caste associations
95% of so called communal riots are local riots between muslims and local caste groups
In Agra, it is between Jatavs ( Dalits ) and muslims
In Hubli it is between Pattigars ( OBC ) and muslims
In Marad it is between fishermen ( Dalits ) and muslims
The sangh parivar has a very peripheral role in these events except that some local sangh units may at times, help these local caste groups resist islamists
Sangh parivar also acts as awareness raising in showing these episodes in mini-pakistans to other hindus
At this point sangh parivar is simply a reactive movement
My suggestion for more activist hindus is to follow the advice of Savarkar and enlist in the army
The Indian army offers a 5 year short service commission
Militarise hindu society and the muslims prefer non-jihadism
It is also found from field experience that muslims prefer to attack hindu localities that are non-cohesive, hence by field experience it is found that muslim propensity to riot comes down in many instances where thanks to sangh ground work in the field, the local hindus got organised
The function of the sangh parivar is to deter muslim rioting and not indulge in rioting
The sangh parivar also suffers from lack of clear thinking
They lament over Akhand Bharat and at the same time complain quite rightly about BD illegals ( a small sample of Akhand Bharat or shall I say Akhand Islamistan )
Sardar Patel was much clearer on the implication of partition
he called it amputation of a gangrenous limb
Partition got rid of as many muslims as possible without losing too much land
The sangh parivar laments over islamic demographics instead of launching a
counter-demographic warfare program
In conclusion, the sangh parivar offers a very useful but incomplete solution to the problems of hindu society
---------------------
If you consider that hindu society is besieged and facing total war
sangh parivar performs a role which I term civil defense
a very critical and important role, but much different from an army
The psecs paint sangh parivar as a militant organisation mainly to fool hindus
to think they have a protector and they can rest at ease
At no point does sangh parivar claim to have a paramilitary force
Per Guru Golwalker and many other hindu scholars, hindu society faces attacks
from 3 fronts
Islam, missionary minded xtians ( as opposed to normal xtians ), and commies
All 3 of them aim to detach the weakest link in hindu society, namely Dalits and tribals
The composition of India is as follows
Muslims 13%
Xtians 3%
Dalits 16%
Tribals 8%
Sikhs, Jains, Buddhists 3%
OBC 43%
Upper Caste 14%
The main thrust of sangh parivar is to integrate the weaker sections into hindu society. They have several anti-casteist fronts and incidents of casteism have come down drastically, while of course there is still much ground to cover
Tribals are also being integrated into a honorable place in hindu society
Sangh parivar has many senior Dalit and tribal leaders
Sewa activities are critical since this prevents inroads of petro-dollars, church dollars and naxalism
If you look at the naxalite movement, they have a tactical alliance with islamists and missionaries. The Nepal maoists have banned sanskrit and enforced beef eating in their areas
The VHP for instance is not a pure sangh parivar front, it has some members from sangh parivar and some from religious leaders
Thanks to inputs from sangh parivar, many of the independent religious leaders have started anti-casteism and sewa work
This is foundation level work, in raising awareness and creating a will to resist
and creating cohesion in hindu society
Resistance to muslim rioters actually comes from pre-existing caste associations
95% of so called communal riots are local riots between muslims and local caste groups
In Agra, it is between Jatavs ( Dalits ) and muslims
In Hubli it is between Pattigars ( OBC ) and muslims
In Marad it is between fishermen ( Dalits ) and muslims
The sangh parivar has a very peripheral role in these events except that some local sangh units may at times, help these local caste groups resist islamists
Sangh parivar also acts as awareness raising in showing these episodes in mini-pakistans to other hindus
At this point sangh parivar is simply a reactive movement
My suggestion for more activist hindus is to follow the advice of Savarkar and enlist in the army
The Indian army offers a 5 year short service commission
Militarise hindu society and the muslims prefer non-jihadism
It is also found from field experience that muslims prefer to attack hindu localities that are non-cohesive, hence by field experience it is found that muslim propensity to riot comes down in many instances where thanks to sangh ground work in the field, the local hindus got organised
The function of the sangh parivar is to deter muslim rioting and not indulge in rioting
The sangh parivar also suffers from lack of clear thinking
They lament over Akhand Bharat and at the same time complain quite rightly about BD illegals ( a small sample of Akhand Bharat or shall I say Akhand Islamistan )
Sardar Patel was much clearer on the implication of partition
he called it amputation of a gangrenous limb
Partition got rid of as many muslims as possible without losing too much land
The sangh parivar laments over islamic demographics instead of launching a
counter-demographic warfare program
In conclusion, the sangh parivar offers a very useful but incomplete solution to the problems of hindu society